
Originally Posted by
jovipeorliohacokijo
hahahaha OT dayon. hehehe. i think it is not OT. ky nag conflict man, naay verse nga tinood naa pud bakak. and speaking ug bakak, ang Catholic Church could be making bakak about Judas, and they thought nga ma erase na but naa man diay evidence nga how faithful si Judas ni Jesus as a disciple tungod aning Gospel niya. i think naa pa daghan ang uban naa mismo gitagu-an sa vatican, huwat na lng sa right pope nga mupagawas sa baho ky si pope john paul uwahi naman kaayo, tiguwang naman siya nakabalo.
nganong waman gi mention sa matthew nga naputol ang pisi nga gihikogan ni judas, unya naugbok. wa pud giseguro ni judas kung lig-on ba ang pisi para wala nay daghan storya

hehehe.
ho jovs, the gospel of Judas is not even written by Judas. as per carbon dating, it was written almost 300 years ago after his death..it was also the time as per history nga grabe kaau ka boom ang Christianity..so it is also possible nga kanang gospel of judas was to discredit the gospels or new testament accounts written by first hand witnesses themselves and those
written 50-100 years AD.
of course why would the gospel and new testament writers wrote such details about Judas when the gospel is not even about Judas..jovs, branding the Catholic Church as a false church would discredit the great minds in both past and present who believed in its doctrines esp with the Judas gospel.now by the term "great minds" i mean scientists, bible scholars,researchers
who devoted their lives in studying about the church's doctrines...one of the many is Saint Augustine.
with his past jovs, you know that he could have been one of the first people who would backed out from the catholic church if your accusations were true..but instead, he became the bishop of hippo...
i'm not saying that abuse and politics is not preset in the church but calling the church doctrines a lie
is extreme esp coming from a "happy person"like you...Lol

and besides it is also OT
so si Hudas lang usa atong tukion run...

bow