Over 160 Professors Refuse to Debate Creationist!

**kebotDiNaMute** · 09-23-2009, 08:35 AM

1 vs 160?

YouTube - Over 160 Professors Refuse to Debate Creationist!

check out the videos... ARE YOU BETTER THAN THE PROFESSOR Berkeley University?

Mods, please don't close yet, we will see how things goes. please! This are information they need to know.

**Malic** · 09-23-2009, 08:51 AM

let me quote some comments from the people who heard and watch this video...

Very dissapointing that there was no one qualified to debate this man ( I see how religion might have come to be).

There were a few good attempts by some people. I will try to put them here so viewers can skip to those good parts.

1:03:52 Guy proves to Hovind new information emerge into genome as a natural process. yet Hovind refuses to accept that as evidence of Evolution.
1:55:44 Guy has some interesting points about Kents demonstrate Kent's bad logic (there is no opposite of evolution).

2:20:00 Lady Demonstrates how Hovind has double standards for Science and religion. (Religion is justifiable, yet Science is a fairy Tale if it doesn't fit Hovind's standards)

2:26:40 The last guy asks Hovind why the hell he calls his Ministry Science when it is no better (if not worse) than evolution.

Overall, I see why Dawkins and others refuse to debate creationists because in this presentation Hovind has gained some false credibility by simply using rhetoric.

and this video was made approx, 6 years ago.

**Malic** · 09-23-2009, 09:03 AM

the lecture sounds more magic than science.

**brownprose** · 09-23-2009, 09:43 AM

Hovind is not worth any reasonable professor's time. To believe Hovind is like believing we all came from cow's dung.

**bluedes** · 09-23-2009, 10:08 AM

gosh, na unsa man ni oi.. first 3 minutes of the video naglecture xa sa bible?? what kind of science is that? Creationism is just religion packaged to try as it may (but still fail) to intrude on the arena of science.. paka-ulaw lng jud ni si hovind oi..

reason why 160 professors refuse to debate with him? only one reason--waste of time.. and its a waste of time watching this video.. first 3 minutes lng daan..

**munzter666** · 09-23-2009, 10:55 AM

Originally Posted by brownprose

Hovind is not worth any reasonable professor's time. To believe Hovind is like believing we all came from cow's dung.

darn right, he is. talk about credibility.
and he keeps on banking on HOVIND for the Nth time already...and expects to be taken SERIOUSLY.

**kebotDiNaMute** · 09-23-2009, 01:08 PM

Originally Posted by bluedes

gosh, na unsa man ni oi.. first 3 minutes of the video naglecture xa sa bible?? what kind of science is that? Creationism is just religion packaged to try as it may (but still fail) to intrude on the arena of science.. paka-ulaw lng jud ni si hovind oi..

reason why 160 professors refuse to debate with him? only one reason--waste of time.. and its a waste of time watching this video.. first 3 minutes lng daan..

In a debate blue, there are stands/claim on each side, which will be proven and disproven along the way, it best the one will declare its claim to make it clear what is the CLAIM and what are they debating... Guess what you can skip the claim you can move on...

Hovind vs. Dr. Rainbow.
YouTube - Kent Hovind vs Rainbow part 2.

check out the first 20 minutes... they are discussing claims.

**kebotDiNaMute** · 09-23-2009, 01:14 PM

Originally Posted by brownprose

Hovind is not worth any reasonable professor's time. To believe Hovind is like believing we all came from cow's dung.

Well if you choose not to believe, you can do so... no questions asked... but at University of Berkeley they ask question, some question that are very difficult to answer. And yes nobody in that University was good enough to contend their EVOLUTION THEORY.

Bro our story here are low-ballers debate... what I had presented is an Institution a Pillar of Scientific Discoveries and Research, yet they FAILED TO DEFEND EVOLUTION. So how TRUE IS EVOLUTION? if its for real it can stand against allegation, but sad to say nobody ever remain standing.

**kebotDiNaMute** · 09-23-2009, 01:17 PM

Originally Posted by munzter666

darn right, he is. talk about credibility.
and he keeps on banking on HOVIND for the Nth time already...and expects to be taken SERIOUSLY.

It will be the most comfortable way to do so... just ignore him, because there is no way you can contest his findings against EVOLUTION. Too bad, hovind answered a scientific inconsistency of your EVOLUTION CLAIM. Just ignore it, you won't believe it either... find that comfort...

**kebotDiNaMute** · 09-23-2009, 01:19 PM

Originally Posted by Malic

the lecture sounds more magic than science.

Yes but nobody tells the guy he is DUMB. How was that possible? An audience of the TOP NOTCHED institution, yet nobody wants to stand-up and said, you are WRONG. Does it mean he is RIGHT?

Thread: Over 160 Professors Refuse to Debate Creationist!

Thread Tools

Search Thread