"There is no conflict between religion and science"

[redhorse1L]

---

hhhmmmm..
Murag nalayo na lagi ang istorya sa topic.

The title states that "There is no conflict between religion and science"..

Is there?

[petite fleur]

wrong. i wasn't referring to the faithful.



wrong again.



no you don't. other wise you wouldn't continue below:



katass sa imo speech noh? in no way does it explain or address anything that we are talking about. and i have not even talked about those issue you just brought up. maybe that's how you see yourself and others.

I don't care and I am not here to please you either.
and by the way....

I started this thread...

kinsa may ni simang jd?

[SioDenz]

only branch of Religion I know that has a problem with Science is Christianity.

the Roman Catholic Church accepts Science.

So Catholics are Not Christians?

[yiennahs]

I don't care and I am not here to please you either.

people here will always question you because of your religion
why? because you have one and they don't

[tokidoki]

I think that the Catholic Church as an institution is the antithesis of what Jesus was all about. Jesus hated to see holier-than-thous praying in public (Matthew 6:5-. He eschewed displays of wealth (e.g. Pajero, all those magnificent palaces and places of worship). He didn't hand around buckets to collect money from the poor faithful while the church swims in wealth ("Give till it hurts"). Jesus Christ gave rather than took. Jesus Christ was a rebel in his time who knew what it felt like to be persecuted. And look at what the Catholic Church did throughout history...a long trail of blood of the people they persecuted and tortured and executed for the crime of having a difference of opinion. It loves power and it loves money. I think if he ever comes back, he will have something to say about the religion that bore his name.

Yes, and that is a religion that doesn't benefit anyone with material means. But that's only half of what I said. Although it couldn't be exploited for financial gain it was corrupted over the years.

Someone who started with good intentions was twisted and clouded over the years and only served to benefit people OTHER than the founder.

[tokidoki]

I don't care and I am not here to please you either.

oh, did i say i was also here to please you?

and by the way....

I started this thread...

and you're in a forum. your point is?

kinsa may ni simang jd?

that would be you. you could've posted this in existing threads and yet you had to start a new one.

somehow your tone seems to be veering towards, "there is no conflict between religion and science but i want you all to follow religion."

[SioDenz]

Back to Science and religion topic nata

[tokidoki]

Back to Science and religion topic nata

[petite fleur]

Speaking of the Pope, I wanted to ask Catholics for their honest answer to this question. If that humble son of a carpenter, in whose name that palace at St. Peter's Square was built, came back and knocked on that door to stay for the night, would they let him in?

Come on, we all know the answer. They'd shoo that man away like an unwanted peasant.

I think that the Catholic Church as an institution is the antithesis of what Jesus was all about. Jesus hated to see holier-than-thous praying in public (Matthew 6:5-. He eschewed displays of wealth (e.g. Pajero, all those magnificent palaces and places of worship). He didn't hand around buckets to collect money from the poor faithful while the church swims in wealth ("Give till it hurts"). Jesus Christ gave rather than took. Jesus Christ was a rebel in his time who knew what it felt like to be persecuted. And look at what the Catholic Church did throughout history...a long trail of blood of the people they persecuted and tortured and executed for the crime of having a difference of opinion. It loves power and it loves money. I think if he ever comes back, he will have something to say about the religion that bore his name.

By the way, if you go back to 30 AD, back to when Jesus was preaching in some town square or the market, and you shout "Jesus Christ!"...guess who'd acknowledge your call. Right, nobody. Jesus was a Jew and was given the Jewish name Yeshua. Wouldn't a preservation of that original name be a more respectful tribute to the person whose name you worship?

I'm just asking.

Ha! this happened to St. Francis
They shooing Him away for He looked so ragged and filthy.

but later on they let him enter and the Pope kissed St. Francis's feet.

Please, yaw e generalize kay Katoliko me og naa mey pagtoo kami tanan ing-ana na jd diay ka sakto?

EVEN The best fall down sometimes.

We acknowledge our imperfections.
Not all of us "CATHOLICS" are perfect and that includes the bishops and the clergy and the members of the religious.

Kay nasayup man sila imu na generalize?

Nganu kanang imung mga ge pang QUOTE gikan sa mga apostoles nagtoo ka wla pd na silay kasayupang gebuhat?


People hate the priest for they don't practice what they preach.
So be it! Hate them! But not the RELIGION itself
Not the PEOPLE who still believe and has a FAITH
Hate them! HATE THEM I SAY
But please respect those people nga naay pagtoo
kung naay sayup ang mga taw membro sa relihiyon.
Ilaha nang sayup dile AMUa nga kami ni too lamang sa GINOO

We don't pray to them but we go to church to pray to GOD.
To MARY & the SAINTS for INTERCESSION
'Even the SAINTS has their own imperfections and faults

But,We do also pray FOR them(the priest) so that they may be able to serve US and GOD better.

WE are just humans not GODS!

[petite fleur]

oh, did i say i was also here to please you?



and you're in a forum. your point is?



that would be you. you could've posted this in existing threads and yet you had to start a new one.

somehow your tone seems to be veering towards, "there is no conflict between religion and science but i want you all to follow religion."

It's up to you my friend unsaon nimu pag sabot sa akong boot ipasabot.
We are just defending our side here.
You defend yours.