Everything about : RH Bill ( Reproductive Health Bill)

[GemWArrioR]

Dont drag me unto your childish war mobawii pud ko pikon bya kaayo ka.

No one saying you are a terrorist you atheist btw?

HAHAHAHAHAAHHAHA g e r m o jin ako athiest, is Being a PRO RH BILL an athies!!!! ROFL jhahahahahahahahahahashahaha

[GemWArrioR]

the teenage pregnancies rate here is unverified. do remember we don not want to mislead people man kaha

The US and UK had done what you said did they decrease teenage pregnancies? what makes you think we will fare better? i raise this question a lot of times why no one answering it?

Plus *** education is not a popular choice! They even a parent group sued DepEd. Masangit lang gyud ning RH bill tungod ani, plus we dont need RH bill for this, *** ed had been taught for decades na but not that comprehensive in teaching contraceptives use. Statistic shows country like Japan and Korea had low teenage pregnancies even though they dont teach teens on how to ue contraceptives this statistics can well relate to our case cause we have low teen pregnancies compared toUS and UK, go visit every school and universities and find out how many do get pregnant.

I will share an article to you.


Medical Primer on RH Bill

Sorry for the caps. like i said Freud is right that *** education will liberate students, the best way is to sexual oppressed them/tell them not to engage in ***. It had worked well with us right?

hahahahaha, teeanage pregnancies is unverified hahahahahah ROLF g e r mo j i n .. try watching the reporters notebook in the GMA 7... rampant kaayo ang teenage pregnancies here in PH... hahahahahaha..

plus *** education is not a popular choice! They even a parent group sued DepEd. Masangit lang gyud ning RH bill tungod ani, plus we dont need RH bill for this, *** ed had been taught for decades na but not that comprehensive in teaching contraceptives use. Statistic shows country like Japan and Korea had low teenage pregnancies even though they dont teach teens on how to ue contraceptives this statistics can well relate to our case cause we have low teen pregnancies compared toUS and UK, go visit every school and universities and find out how many do get pregnant.

s - e - x Education is a must, why because it will make people will made aware what are the consequences of unprotected ***, RH Bill does not promote promiscuity, Pre-marital 6, WITH or WITH OUT RH BILL, people perform 6.....

ROFL to comments of g e r g e r low m o e j i n

[GemWArrioR]

[QUOTE=Romeojin;10018029]Tell that to your fellow PRO RH named yiennahs, I know PMS is increasing im not denying that, you misread my post. The question does RH bill will lead to more occurrence considering we are giving RH rights to teens, they have the right to ask contraceptives even without their parents knowledge.[quote]
HAHAHAHA ntatawa ako naman dito, ROFL....
RH BILL will not make the teens to be more active in ***, it is their final decision to engage in ***, try reading the bill, it does not states that the BILL promotes ***.... it gives choices and awareness.. it even promotes safety ***.... try reading an article about AIDS/HIV decline in thailand...

klaro kaayo wala ka pa asawa at anak g e r low moe jin... hahahahaha

[vipvip68]

I am for a bigger population. Our best resource and export is and always will be manpower. Too bad we have a none competitive minimum wage and overly protectionist economic and labor policies.

simplistic ra kaayo imong viewpoint.

Reality does not work like that.

Let's make the analogy of our country to that of a factory.


Children are like raw materials. Ideally, the more raw materials a factory has, the more it should produce. But without the proper facilities to process the raw materials (healthcare, education and employment), we will not be able to utilize it. We will instead be stuck with the raw materials and end up paying more just to keep these raw materials stored. And if we do not properly care for the raw materials, they will eventually spoil, rot, rust..

Having the mindset of bigger population equating to bigger manpower is short sighted and does not take into account the social realities these children will face when they suffer due to lack of healthcare, education and jobs.

What we need is to balance our population growth to match our country's available resources so as not to strain them.

We need to effectively manage our population growth for this to be possible and the RHB is a step in the right direction towards achieving this.

[trollaccount]

simplistic ra kaayo imong viewpoint.

Reality does not work like that.

Let's make the analogy of our country to that of a factory.


Children are like raw materials. Ideally, the more raw materials a factory has, the more it should produce. But without the proper facilities to process the raw materials (healthcare, education and employment), we will not be able to utilize it. We will instead be stuck with the raw materials and end up paying more just to keep these raw materials stored. And if we do not properly care for the raw materials, they will eventually spoil, rot, rust..

Having the mindset of bigger population equating to bigger manpower is short sighted and does not take into account the social realities these children will face when they suffer due to lack of healthcare, education and jobs.

What we need is to balance our population growth to match our country's available resources so as not to strain them.

We need to effectively manage our population growth for this to be possible and the RHB is a step in the right direction towards achieving this.

It is amazing what the human mind can do. Blocking details no matter how relevant they may be because they are contrary to our views.

In case you forgot I also mentioned: "Too bad we have a none competitive minimum wage and overly protectionist economic and labor policies."

What is simplistic and lazy is comparing manpower as a resource similar to raw materials used in factories. Let us take on your concern with regards to educating the raw materials. Our literacy rate is higher than China's or Malaysia's or Vietnam's or India's when they started their boom. It might even be higher now and our literacy rate has not decreased, further proving that education as it is is sustainable. These economies were built on no other resource more important than labor and look at where they are now.

What drives the Cebuano economy? Where can you find the biggest employers?

[vipvip68]

It is amazing what the human mind can do. Blocking details no matter how relevant they may be because they are contrary to our views.

In case you forgot I also mentioned: "Too bad we have a none competitive minimum wage and overly protectionist economic and labor policies."

What is simplistic and lazy is comparing manpower as a resource similar to raw materials used in factories. Let us take on your concern with regards to educating the raw materials. Our literacy rate is higher than China's or Malaysia's or Vietnam's or India's when they started their boom. It might even be higher now and our literacy rate has not decreased, further proving that education as it is is sustainable. These economies were built on no other resource more important than labor and look at where they are now.

What drives the Cebuano economy? Where can you find the biggest employers?

My point is, there should be a balance between population growth and our countrys capacity to provide basic services. all you need to do is travel around the country especially in the urban areas where mothers have 8 to 12 kids without any means to support them.

Health centers are packed and overcapacity. Public schools operate on 3 shifts to accomodate the number of children. People are forced to seek opportunities abroad because of lack of jobs available locally.

You talk about literacy but you do not factor in the quality of education or the percentage of people who actually finish their schooling.

Most filipinos are lucky to finish high school. Most end up working as domestic helpers because of their lack of educational attainment and lack of employment opportunities.

Lets stop acting like china or india because these countries may be rich or on the rise economically but the living conditions of most of their people are just as bad as ours and we still do not have the economic capacity as these countries.

Its all about balance and uplifting quality of life for all. Its quality not quantity we need.

[3nZ0y]

I am for a bigger population. Our best resource and export is and always will be manpower. Too bad we have a none competitive minimum wage and overly protectionist economic and labor policies.

You seem to have a bit of mix-up there folk. But let me make it clearer because I agree with you. IF and ONLY IF the following are met:
1. There are enough school to educate the children. That is 1:1 ratio for books and 30 or less students per classroom.
2. Quality teachers teaching these students.
3. Better education system that will improve efficiency in Science, Mathematics and English, being the major and commonly applied subjects.
4. More and better resources i.e. foods, agricultural and industrial products.
5. More and better job most especially within the country/locality.
6. Increase in salary for the minimum wage earners which comprise a large chunk of the total population.
7. More accessible and better livelihood program.
8. More accessible and realistic housing program.
9. Better services -- from public health centers to hospitals to doctors to police officers and so on.....
10. More comprehensive government financial assistance.

Do you see the whole picture now? Yes, population, as a manpower is an asset. But do you consider how much is its percentage comprises the 'decent worker'? How much of the population are considered 'dependent population' (too young to work, unfit to work, or simply too lazy to work)?

And yes, I agree that dako og natabang ang mga OFW. Ingon bitaw nila, 'Philippines: the country of servants.' (Anong say mo?) But what if mapareho niadtong nagubot sa Libya? Nahitabo sa Japan? ug uban pa? And the ultimate question is ang pag adto sa gawas nakapalingkawas ba sa Pilipinas gikan sa utang? Ngano man kaha?

Again, kung mas daghan ang tawo, mas modako ang panginahanglan. Kung kaya na masuportaan, nganong dili. Pero kung dili kaya suportaan, ngano tuyoon man og padaghan sa mga tawo? For resources/export?

[lostbutfound]

the problem with some guys here, they rely mostly on other people's studies. emprical data? that's BS. you know why? because i still believe that first-hand experience is better than just reading their studies. are those really true? or just a product of what they want us to believe? don't depend on their data but go out to the streets and interview people. make a survey of your own. participate in medical missions. that's what i do. and then you will be able to understand why this bill should be passed.

kaning mga nagrely sa mga studies kunuhay sa mga experts, mga lalake siguro sad ni but walay mga anak. no slight idea how hard it is to raise many kids. not to mention ang gastuhan sa pagpanganak sa asawa and seeing your wife suffer and put their selves in danger everytime they give birth. everytime my wife is pregnant there are always complications. the first time she gave birth, our baby almost died. that traumatized her leading us to only have *** once in a blue moon because even if nagpills sya sa amo time sa amo first baby nabuntis japon sya.

sa amo second baby, i can still remember august of 2009 we had ***. but then she had her period after 2 weeks. then after that she missed her period. she did a preg test at home, it was negative. by november 2009 we had *** again. and because wa pa japon sya dug-a since august, she took DIANE 35 the day after. she consumed the 21-day pill but still no period. so she decided to just take another pack. after the second pack, still nothing so she did another preg test. POSITIVE NA...

question, if ang giingon ninyo nga data nga kanang pills abortifacient pa, nanu wa man nakuha ang bata? BS kaayo na inyo data oi kung wala mo kaexperience mismo.

[lostbutfound]

HAHAHAHAHAAHHAHA g e r m o jin ako athiest, is Being a PRO RH BILL an athies!!!! ROFL jhahahahahahahahahahashahaha

katawa man ko ani oie nyahahaha... atheist sad diay ko hahahaha


@romeojin

since nagsige man ka insist nga way nitubag nimo anang sa US/UK naa RH Bill pero wala na decrease ang teenage pregnancies, naghatag nako article about ana... and dont give me that BS nga tungod kay ang site ingon ani ingon ana. kay even you dili ka kaassure namo tanan dire nga ang studies diha sa mga experts tinuod jud. kay it may just be product of what they want us to believe

here is the site:

http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2...y-in-us-states

[vipvip68]

Every time pro or anti RH advocates made a survey it all favors them. 80% had agree on the bill according to the PR RH another survey says 95% disagree with the bill according to the anti RH. which is which ?

the poll is based on text, facebook and twitter, i bet this poll had much many respondents.

heres my answer:
1. do NFP otherwise buy your won contraceptives ! theres no law preventing anyoneto buy contraceptives but please limit your contraceptives into condoms cause nearly all contraceptives had abortifacient effect.

2. i do not know this one, more or less the same as how many people die in a minute

3. depends on the location if their an available birthing center or good hospital in the area.

4. 100s of millions. unless we enforce 1 -2 child policy we will still grows significantly. we will be spending billions on RH and yet questionable results lol cause i bet more than 3 gihapon ang mga anak per family average.

5. the poor esp in the rural areas, cause they want more children for their livelihoods.

6. NFP or otherwise abstinence. i know its hard thats why personally i would recommend to buy their own condom we dont need a bill with many flaws.

1. Its incorrect to assume that nearly all contraceptives are abortifacient. That simply is not true and medical professionals can attest to that.

4. Imposing a 1-2 child policy would be totally against our rights and liberties. Population growth reduction through the distribution and availability of contraceptives has already been proven effective in thailand. They were able to decrease population growth from 4.7 down to 1.7 children per family and their economy and quality of life has been improving ever since.

5. The problem is, there are not enough opportunities availale in the rural areas so we see a lot of families migrating to urban centers to make a living but they still have the mindset that having more children will help them without thinking that in an urban environment their children will most likely end up as street children, beggars, snatchers, prostitutes etc. In this case more children does not mean better quality of life for all.

6. Aside from having them buy their own as opposed to providing them one in the health centers, the bigger issue here is that most of these people dont even know about family planning or birth control. Also because of religion, they believe that using a condom even between married couples is a sin. These archaic beliefs and fears stem from a church that preaches morals but does nothing to promote social responsibility and warn of the dangers of having too many children and not being able to provide for them. The church simply has the motto "God will provide". What the church is doing is a disservice to society and shows their detachment from the harsh economic realities we face today.