The Day The Science Died...global warming lies hacked

[loloyis.com]

---

"The scientific community is buzzing over thousands of emails and documents -- posted on the Internet last week after being hacked from a prominent climate-change research center -- that some say raise ethical questions about a group of scientists who contend humans are responsible for global warming."

read on the links.
TBR.cc: The Day The Science Died?:
Climate Skeptics See 'Smoking Gun' in Researchers' Leaked E-Mails - Biology | Astronomy | Chemistry | Physics - FOXNews.com
Climate Emails Stoke Debate - WSJ.com
Read All About it! Climate Depot Exclusive - Continuously Updated 'ClimateGate' News Round Up | Climate Depot

this is very disappointing. post your comments.

[rodsky]

If imong usa ka friend nga bayot turned out to be a kawatan, it doesn't follow nga tanang bayot sa kalibutan kawatan na.

If naay usa ka pari nga nag-molestia sa mga young boys sa usa ka parish somewhere in Bohol, it doesn't follow nga TANANG pari sa tibuok Pilipinas mga pedophile.

Ergo, you cannot make generalizations from one isolated case/incident. Other scientists are still truthful in their global warming research. Kanang mga scientists who were involved in that "dagdag-bawas" incident are perhaps:

a) seeking glory/attention (i.e. want to be on the cover of some scientific journal)

b) seeking money (i.e. additional funding for their research)

c) working for a company that sells solar panels, etc.

But again, it DOES NOT mean that EVERY scientist in the world is conspiring to FALSELY TERRORIZE the world of the global warming issue.

There still are scientists in the world who do not wish for a, b and c.

-RODION

[loloyis.com]

Amen to that bro.
But the point here is that global warming was never true. We've been told lies.

[rodsky]

Amen to that bro.
But the point here is that global warming was never true. We've been told lies.

You're already concluding that from THAT incident alone? What about data from other global warming research firms and establishments? What about statements from IPCC?

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Silbi, para sa imo, bakakon pod ang IPCC and bakakon na silang tanang scientists? Pag gamiton nato imong logic, mura nag conclude na ka nga tanang muslim kay mga terrorista, because Al Qaeda members are muslim, and Al Qaeda members are terrorists.

Narrow kaayo ang imong thinking bro.

-RODION

[ethzneuron]

tell that to the polar bears...

[rodsky]

tell that to the polar bears...

Mao. Some people just too easily join the "I've been had/conned/tricked" bandwagon, without fully understanding the situation.

Sa ato pa, right this very moment, CNN is lying to the public...

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/eu...aty/index.html

*shakes head*

-RODION

[moz_k2]

"If people don’t have an understanding of what science is and what scientists do, then they can tend to think that global warming, for example, is just a matter of opinion."
- Brian Cox in Seed magazine

[loloyis.com]

oh I forgot the IPCC...

"The emails disclose the IPCC chose, for political rather than scientific reasons, to keep using a 1961-1990 baseline for atmospheric temperature measurements. We've all been told ad nauseum that 30 years is "a climate trend". So by 2007's AR4 report you'd have to ask why they weren't choosing a 1976-2005 baseline? The answer is this:

Neil

There is a preference in the atmospheric observations chapter of IPCC AR4 to stay with the 1961-1990 normals. This is partly because a change of normals confuses users, e.g. anomalies will seem less positive than before if we change to newer normals, so the impression of global warming will be muted. SOURCE: 1105019698.txt

There you go. Proof you've been played for suckers. More modern data would have disclosed less warming in recent times, because 1961-1990 coincided with a cold cycle and that ancient baseline makes modern warming look tropical by comparison, hence it is perfect to overinflate the significance of the warming for political purposes. "

[geetarista]

more conspiracies...

[personalmgt]

I've seen plenty of threads like these in some forums about the Global Warming Conspiracy. Too bad most of them were locked