
Originally Posted by
marc francis
-exactly my point! thanks yokam. the thing that people dont understand is that when it comes to fraternities they tend to think about college men going happy-go-lucky and doing nothing with their lives thats why really it is so hard to explain. not only that but you also get this members from other frats "kuno" who tend to portray that picture. but the thing is not all frats are like that, depende na lang talaga kung anu ang frat na pinili mo. if you happen to make a crappy decision well what do you get? a crappy frat with low-life brods and easy to get sisses who knows nothing but to waste their times and proclaiming that they are the best. the funny thing is kung sino yung di kumikibo yun ang may nararating. on the other hand there is this certain part of a minority, a very, very small part that still believes in camaraderie and friendship found within the true fraternity. like i said before and like what yokam said, we make it known to the neophytes what they are getting into. and like them, we also making paddling as the last resort. neophytes are never lied to why should we when lives are at stake? and what intellectuals? did you know that almost all of our presidents have been an alumnus of some fraternity? did you know that presidents from other countries as well even the poor ones like in africa are members of frats as well? did you know that some of the bands, actors even religious people you see on tv are fratmen? now tell me if frats are really that bad then why did they join given their high intelligence? know your facts before judging, know the facts that there is a minority out there who actually cares more about hitting the books rather than vandalizing their names on the public wall. step in a fratmans shoe, the true fratman and you'll see fraternities isnt all what you thought it would be.
as for chris, i know it all seems bad but like i said, he knew what he was getting into. he knew that there was a 50% chance he'll die. he knew that he could still have a good career without ever becoming a fratman. he knew he could still be a UP alumni and make a name for himself in whatever field without ever joining sigma rho. he knew the risk and still he took it.
50% chance that he could die, so fratmen who do the initiation rights know half the chance they get they kill a man? to me, that is either murder, homicide..why do it with half the chance you become a murderer? Is it worth the risk? well anyway, if you did kill the neophyte, those men go into hiding, cover things up..is that what we call good leadership? where is responsibility and accountability there? last time I checked, a real leader has those qualities as requisites