Hello sorbetes, thanks for the added info
No read and no write is ILLITERATE. Being illiterate doesn't necessarily mean nga wala na'y knowledge. A person can still have a sense of what is right and wrong even without knowing how to read and write. After all, knowledge is not only based on one's literacy.
I hope, that this 2nd opinion, truly untainted by our discussion, mr. springfield, will give you the idea that knowledge is responsible for out perception of which is good and not.
But then again, knowledge does not wholly govern what is right or wrong. Naa bya mga instances nga we know that it's wrong and yet we still do it. I still think right or wrong is subjective - depends on the belief of the individual and all the factors that could affect such belief, like iyang environment, society he lives in, etc.
But sir sorbetes' idea is of a different shade with contrast to mine. Again I "assert" and this I will explicitly say, that knowledge is the key to our comprehension of what is right and wrong, of course, with wisdom, our ability to digest the knowledge we are seeing/receiving.
Those instances you are talking about sir sorbetes, where we know that a specific decision is bad but still decide to do it is a product of human interes with regards to, still, what he knows will be good for him regardless if it is bad for other's be they are events or beings. The fact that you "know" it is bad, and still do it, does not hide that truth that you already comprehendid it as bad.
P
ero mao sad lagi, being subjective, who draws the clear line between right or wrong? Mawala nah ang distinction. So we're back to the question.
The distinction lies on your personal interest, you can try to go back to the base of the discussion but let me drag you to my idea, knowledge, a staple way of knowing, will give you the comprehension of what is right or wrong, provided that your wisdom is of appropriate simile to the norms of the morals, be it cultural or general.
The social contract theory works for me, when viewed as a whole. Pero not every member in a society functions with the same goal or belief in mind. If mu.defy xa sah norm of society, does that mean wrong xa when to him, iyang gbuhat is sakto?
Exactly, thus my idea of personal interest.