The Original Bible

[bluedes]

---

ang mga ramblings sa mga amateurs tanan puro haka haka. magtoon pa mo ug tarung.

By the way its not the original bible but the oldest.

The Error lies sa translations (KJV, NIV, NASB and others...) and since the manuscripts are copied from older manuscript and since wala pa may Copying Machine or Xerox machine sauna naturally naay mga sipyat sa mga strokes.

But the error of the translations do not affect the entire message of the bible. For starters...like instead of writing "Son of God" ang gisuwat lang "The Son of God". Then all errors have been identified naman and the necessary corrections were made.

Kamo no diri mora jud mo ug mga sweto oi...kabasa lang gani mo sa google moputak namo as if you are experts already. Mga delusional man mo diri.

ilad-lad na imong mga degrees Acts.. you claim to have the right to teach theology diba..
i'm sure other people are just waiting to read what you have to lecture.. after all, it's still for the sake of learning and broadening our knowledge brad!

[NASYO]

hmmmm...well...i don't want to argue with you people...my last word for this thread and for Nasyo boy is God is merciful..his love endures forever...so, before it's too late accept Christ as your personal savior today..Have a blessed Day...

no problemo sir.

[NASYO]

the oral tradition isnt that reliable either, come to think of it.

a simple team building exercise comprising of 10-20 people passing a message...it doesnt really yield 100% of the message content. what more kung generation to generation.

even a sample of 5.
pero ambot kaha sa document pass over.

[munzter666]

the witch-hunts were fueled by spain's greedy monarch. our church, by it's weak pope, was a victim.

yes, hands. but not really a victim. a beneficiary would be a right term, for the spoils.

[handsoff241]

by weak i mean, someone who commits sin easily. you are right he was a god**mn benficiary.

[NASYO]

that's good hands. you're learning from the past na diay. wooohoooo.

[dartzed]

So you think your greek versions have no errors?

This amateur, would love to have a discussion with you.

no difference and does not affect the entire message? really? let's take your example, 'Son of God' and 'The Son of God'.

this is how we do it...

The term Son of God could refer to any human beings and even angels. Adam, Eve, Noah, me, regnauld, bluedes, can be called Son of God.

To use the term 'The' Son of God can carry a different meaning, di ba sir? specially when it is used on Jesus. Because using this title on Jesus could mean that Jesus is the ONLY Son of God, he is THE son of god. di ba?

Now kuhaa nang THE from the 'The Son of God', it becomes Son of God, and that term has no heavy impact when it is used on Jesus. Why? because Adam , the angels are called in the bible Son of God. So para naay impact gi butangan ninyo ug THE, para matawag si Jesus as THE son of God so naa nay bias nga meaning,hehe. Gets?

So dont tell me nga wala nay difference.

hmmmmmm i think children of God na cya imo buot pasabot.. Son of God is different..

[dartzed]

the witch-hunts were fueled by spain's greedy monarch. our church, by it's weak pope, was a victim.

yes historians clearly states that most who died in the inquisition was never the pope's order but from the secular group(government)

[Malic]

hmmmmmm i think children of God na cya imo buot pasabot.. Son of God is different..

im sorry...I guess you are not reading your bible.

[regnauld]

im sorry...I guess you are not reading your bible.

Maayo pa diay ang muslim mobasa pa ug maayo sa bible!