The Original Bible

[Acts23]

---

then you consisder yourself as a professional?

son of god, the god's son, the God Sun, the Sun of God

mura'g lahi na jud ang meaning.

if this is the oldest bible, so asa man gibase ang KJV version?
sa not the oldest bible?

You can say that Nas.

Dili lahi Nas kuwang lang ko ug paminsar.

mag lecture pa ko diri kung asa gibase ang KJV?

[NASYO]

You can say that Nas.

Dili lahi Nas kuwang lang ko ug paminsar.

mag lecture pa ko diri kung asa gibase ang KJV?

paglecture lang. maminaw man mi.
subaya kuno kung asa na gibase imong KJV.
basin laing bible sad na.

[kenjoenue]

hmmmm...well...i don't want to argue with you people...my last word for this thread and for Nasyo boy is God is merciful..his love endures forever...so, before it's too late accept Christ as your personal savior today..Have a blessed Day...

[bluedes]

So Bible Fanatics.. what say you?

We all would like to listen to your lectures. It will be good opportunity to discuss further the ramifications on your faith what this online digital Oldest Bible means..

[tarpolano]

hmmmm...well...i don't want to argue with you people...my last word for this thread and for Nasyo boy is God is merciful..his love endures forever...so, before it's too late accept Christ as your personal savior today..Have a blessed Day...

lols.. mao ni gitawag nga panghadlok.. wala namay lain masulti..

[munzter666]

the oral tradition isnt that reliable either, come to think of it.

a simple team building exercise comprising of 10-20 people passing a message...it doesnt really yield 100% of the message content. what more kung generation to generation.

[handsoff241]

mao lagi..naa nata diha nga dli ra si luther ang nilihok...pero it was luther's way that knocked some sense..and eventually paved the way for the reformation..if kadto pang imong giingon nga mga ubang tao nga dli ingon ana ka isog parehas ni luther naa bai mahitabo?..wla..for drastic changes to happen kinahanglan jd nang mutipas ka sa dalan para naai klaro nga kaugmaon..for example sa martial law sa pinas..daghan man tong mga tao nga nakigbisog ni marcos..pero naa ghapon sa gobyerno..pero si ninoy?..he walked the extra mile...so unsai nahitabo?...napapha si marcos..mao sad na sa atoang topic..

Well, I can't argue with that, it is right by it's own stand, but my point is, if luther was such a martyr and a devout catholic, he knows that the doctrined themselves did not want the inquisition to happen, and during his time(luther's time) the inquisition was already tainted by the putrid monarch's clout. it was not as a whole, owed to the church. a devout catholic would have not challenge the doctrines of the church but rather the pope's authority and decision. in every aspect of the doctrine, the inquisition, by it's very essence is a mortal sin. luther attacked our doctrine and challenged it, that's what made him a heretic, by technicality, if we ignore the inquisition for sake of his case.

[handsoff241]

off limits ang past para ni mr. hands...dli ta pwede mu mention ana kai past na daw...humana btaw to past na..pero dli man gd ingon ana ka simple nga ilimod ilubong sa limot..reminder gd..and it's sometimes relevant to talk about it.

dili man ramini, ang ako lang ba, yeah it's good to learn history, it's very useful we can learn from it to avoid any mishaps avoidable. but ang inyo man gud is you are presenting an dusing it in a manner nga dili na pud sakto para namo.
kung ang reason is para ta makat-on as what monster said, sakto diay nang himoun ninyo nga center of your argument, to pivot your disbelief against our church. nya modapig pa mo ni luther, you don't even believe in his god.

[Malic]

ang mga ramblings sa mga amateurs tanan puro haka haka. magtoon pa mo ug tarung.

By the way its not the original bible but the oldest.

The Error lies sa translations (KJV, NIV, NASB and others...) and since the manuscripts are copied from older manuscript and since wala pa may Copying Machine or Xerox machine sauna naturally naay mga sipyat sa mga strokes.

But the error of the translations do not affect the entire message of the bible. For starters...like instead of writing "Son of God" ang gisuwat lang "The Son of God". Then all errors have been identified naman and the necessary corrections were made.

Kamo no diri mora jud mo ug mga sweto oi...kabasa lang gani mo sa google moputak namo as if you are experts already. Mga delusional man mo diri.

So you think your greek versions have no errors?

This amateur, would love to have a discussion with you.

no difference and does not affect the entire message? really? let's take your example, 'Son of God' and 'The Son of God'.

this is how we do it...

The term Son of God could refer to any human beings and even angels. Adam, Eve, Noah, me, regnauld, bluedes, can be called Son of God.

To use the term 'The' Son of God can carry a different meaning, di ba sir? specially when it is used on Jesus. Because using this title on Jesus could mean that Jesus is the ONLY Son of God, he is THE son of god. di ba?

Now kuhaa nang THE from the 'The Son of God', it becomes Son of God, and that term has no heavy impact when it is used on Jesus. Why? because Adam , the angels are called in the bible Son of God. So para naay impact gi butangan ninyo ug THE, para matawag si Jesus as THE son of God so naa nay bias nga meaning,hehe. Gets?

So dont tell me nga wala nay difference.

[handsoff241]

prevalent in these threads too. (points at that oprah thread)
abi kay dato himuan ug chismis...a M.O. used before during the witch hunts, birahan ang dato, sunogon confiscate the properties para madato.

the witch-hunts were fueled by spain's greedy monarch. our church, by it's weak pope, was a victim.