Questions/Doubts/Wrong Practices to the Catholic Church--Analysis and Opinion

[necrotic freak]

---

Paki-list naman ng Anti-popes Ang dami nila? Naputol na haha...

isa kana dun sa mga ANTI.. ano bang napala mo sa pagiging anti mo? deritso kana ba sa langit nyan?

[redhorse1L]

Paki-list naman ng Anti-popes Ang dami nila? Naputol na haha...

Like I've been anticipating.. For sure you will have lots of questions ana.
Haven't you wondered, even the Catholic website, is not baised, and faithfully placed some notes about antipopes?

Set aside the questions and hand down your card (if there's any).

Give your own historical account that traces your Church to the time of the Apostles.

Can't provide anything huh? One thing's for sure, your roots would NOT be earlier than the 16th century..

[redhorse1L]

isa kana dun sa mga ANTI.. ano bang napala mo sa pagiging anti mo? deritso kana ba sa langit nyan?

Tagalog pala ka kapatid?
Ako, nahihirapan na ako sa kalisud dito.
Tao lang ako, mapapagod pud.

[SioDenz]

hahaha.. see, you're starting to doubt the Bible.
Yes! dako jud possibility nga dili si Apostle Matthew nagsulat ana, based on the way the text was written.
And those text were copied MANUALLY by Monks.
When the listing of the Canon came(around 367 AD), there are lots of Book of Matthews, Peter, Thomas in the table, and the Council, has to decide asa ang naay error or wala.


Again, ako balikon.. The Church (Catholic Church today) is already there preaching at the Pentecost, without holding a Bible in their hands, or writing anything.

Nagtoo man tingali ka nga, while nag-sunod2x ang Apostles ni Jesus, nag-sulat sad sila.

hehe, I will never doubt the Bible. Nisakay rako sa imung so-called explanations.

You could have just answered yes or No.
i said asay nag Una, ang teaching ni Kristo o ang Tradition sa katoliko?

Kay kanang sinuwat sa Bibliya especially New testament, mga teachings man na ni Kristo ug kay giapil matud pa nimu ug Compile sa Katoliko, then it should be the truth, right?

[necrotic freak]

Tagalog pala ka kapatid?
Ako, nahihirapan na ako sa kalisud dito.
Tao lang ako, mapapagod pud.

napasubo ako tuloy sa kan-on kapatid.

[SioDenz]

====================================

Do you believe that the Bible is the Word of God? Yes, but NOT the ONLY word of God. God's word is NOT contained by just a book.

Do you believe that the Bible is written and inspired by God? NO, Written by men, inspired by God. Along with the Authority of the Church, that is how the Bible was Compiled.

Do you believe or have faith on Bible teachings?
Yes, but the Church should be the Pillar and Foundation of Truth, NOT the Bible. That is why you should listen to the Church, and NOT just interpret the Bible on you own.

Asa lagi ga una, ang teaching ni Kristo nga naa sa Bibliya or ang tradition sa Katoliko?
Nganu di man ka maka interpret on your own? gitudlo nah ni Kristo? aws wait, naa diay na sa Tradition sah.

Your church did Not write the Bible, Your Just Compiling it(according to you), Therefore mas taas gihapon ang Authority sa Bibliya.

[necrotic freak]

@siodenz and d.a.m.a.s.o.

unsa kaha ang mahitabo kung wala pa nagcompile ug bible ang catholic church? maka himo ba gihapon mo sa inyong relihiyon?

[d.a.m.a.s.o.]

Like I've been anticipating.. For sure you will have lots of questions ana.
Haven't you wondered, even the Catholic website, is not baised, and faithfully placed some notes about antipopes?

Set aside the questions and hand down your card (if there's any).

Give your own historical account that traces your Church to the time of the Apostles.

Can't provide anything huh? One thing's for sure, your roots would NOT be earlier than the 16th century..

Wala akong maipapakita kapatid. Hindi kasi HISTORY ang batayan ng salvation kundi EVANGELIO. =D

1Co 15:1 Ngayo'y ipinatatalastas ko sa inyo, mga kapatid, ang evangelio na sa inyo'y aking ipinangaral, na inyo namang tinanggap, na siya naman ninyong pinananatilihan,
1Co 15:2 Sa pamamagitan naman nito'y ligtas kayo kung matiyaga ninyong iingatan ang salitang ipinangaral ko sa inyo, maliban na kung kayo'y nagsipanampalataya nang walang kabuluhan.

Sapat naman pala yung Evangelio, hindi HISTORY. Bakeet?

1Jn 5:9 Kung tinatanggap natin ang patotoo ng mga tao, ay lalong dakila ang patotoo ng Dios, sapagka't ito ang patotoo ng Dios: sapagka't ito papatotoo tungkol sa kaniyang Anak.

^ Kung tinatanggap mo ang patotoo ng HISTORY at mga sulat ng mga "SANTO" Mas lalong dakila ang patotoo ng Dios =p

Kahit kadugtong pa kayo ng Apostol, naputol naman noong Year 217 A.D.

[d.a.m.a.s.o.]

tulog na ako lol. bye.

[redhorse1L]

Asa lagi ga una, ang teaching ni Kristo nga naa sa Bibliya or ang tradition sa Katoliko?
Nganu di man ka maka interpret on your own? gitudlo nah ni Kristo? aws wait, naa diay na sa Tradition sah.

Your church did Not write the Bible, Your Just Compiling it(according to you), Therefore mas taas gihapon ang Authority sa Bibliya.

Ani nalang, para sayon ra masabtan.

When Luke wrote the Gospel, there was already the Church. Wala pa si Paul ato nagsulat. Which means, naa na ang Church wala pa ma-kompleto ang Bible.

When Paul wrote his Epistles, he wrote it for the Church! Existing na ang Church nagsulat pa si Paul sa Corinth, Galatia, etc. etc.. And Paul is already member of the Church.

And that Church, mao na ang Catholic Church karon.

So kung imong i-sunod2x..

Jesus -> Church -> Bible