a lot of guts and wisdom in that last post right there. read up.
this is the line --------- cross it. i dare you
yes. love your comment 'sen.
thanks
lowballing... that's what's it's all aboutOriginally Posted by pnoize2k6
found this from a manual by a contributing writer of PICTURE magazine...
You can download the rest of the manual here...Originally Posted by Leslie Burns-Dell’Acqua
lowballers.pdf
The way I understand it is that we don't need a standarized rate for photography work.
What we DO NEED is rate guide on how much to charge for the use of our photos...
like rates for a one year use of your photo on a billboard along Jones avenue compared
to a half page ad... that gets printed in every glossy fashion mag in the world!
Local usage can be based on local print and advertising rates while national usage can
be determined by Manila standards. And there's already a guide for international use.
And usage is in addition to the cost to actually shoot the required photo for use!
Now production costs can be determined by you... check this for a guide:
Cost of Doing Business (CODB.pdf)
If you're in the playing field or planning to go into the business I suggest you check Leslie's website
to preserve you're sanity :mrgreen:...
Just wish I found that info three years ago when all the other photographers kept giving vague answers
on how much to charge then chided me for charging too low. So sometimes lowballing isn't entirely
the fault of the photographer. Time to get educated!!!
Sir, I think the Idea of the standard rate is just a "guide" for all photogrpahers.. specially newbies if they go into photo biz. I think no one is force to comply with those rates..(its mentioned somewer in those paragraphs) Ive read this before and i partially/conditionaly agree with it thou.Originally Posted by Zerone_null
I do agree with you on this too sir. I do agree that its not only a job but as an art as well.. but the sad truth is, not everybody thinks the same way we do..its something that we just have to live with.. make few adjustments and adapt in someways.Originally Posted by Zerone_null
![]()
It's just sad to realize how some professionals look at it.
quoting the article:
"This causes a devastating effect on the photography industry...........To a large extent, these new photographers can't be blamed because there is no existing guide to base their prices on."
Which can only mean that new photographers are being, to some extent, blamed for a devastating effect--A spiraling down of prices. A guide would, as suggested, provide a fair pricing guide for all photographers. However, I wonder what labels a new photographer would get for not following such a guide--"low flyer?","cheapo?","unfair?". But I wonder what labels to call that newbie photographer with his prices rubbing elbows with the big fish.. "dead?","wannabe?","whosiznameagain?".
Ah, the perfect name probably: He-who-lost-the-deal.
this is the line --------- cross it. i dare you
Similar Threads |
|