Union finds PAL’s regrets letter to ‘abusive’ solon ‘regrettable’
MANILA, Philippines—The Philippine Airlines’ ground crew union criticized the apology issued by the national carrier’s management to Alliance of Volunteer Educators Party-list Representative Eulogio Magsaysay, who publicly berated a PAL flight attendant last month over a seating arrangement.
“The regrets letter is regrettable for it conveys the wrong message that PAL ignores the abusive behavior and sexist remarks of Magsaysay,” Gerry Rivera, PAL Employees Association president and Partido ng Manggagawa vice chair said in a statement.
Magsaysay is facing a complaint before the Office of the Ombudsman and the House of Representatives ethics committee from the attendant, Sarah Bonnin-Ocampo, who said she was “dishonored" in public and was called a “menopausal bitch" by the lawmaker.
PALEA had learned that PAL customer management officer Remigio Alina wrote to convey the airlines’ “sincerest regrets” to the Magsaysay family and distanced the company from Ocampo’s complaints against the congressman.
PALEA said it has been demanding that the PAL management draft a manual of operations for handling customer relations that safeguards the rights of its workers together with specifying the responsibilities of employees to customers.
“The saying ‘The customer is always right’ is wrong. When customers purchase goods or services, they did not buy the dignity of employees serving them. There must be protection for frontline service employees of PAL. The global union International Transport Workers Federation recommends such a manual of operations,” explained Rivera.
“If the regrets letter were a pro forma response from PAL from an unsatisfied customer, then it is understandable. But that is not the case here. The regrets letter turns a blind eye to the facts of the case: first, the incident report filed by Ocampo’s supervisor corroborating her allegations against Magsaysay; and second, Magsaysay’s own admission of guilt and offer of apology,” Rivera argued.
According to the labor leader, the regrets letter only revealed that PAL was “concerned only with its profits and not the welfare of its employees.”
“Workers are treated as disposable rags that are without dignity and can be outsourced. If Ocampo was not a union member protected by a collective bargaining agreement and instead were a contractual employee in a service provider, she would have been laid off by now as Magsaysay had threatened her,” he said.
PALEA also warned PAL against any form of workplace discrimination on Ocampo arising from her pursuit of the case.
“It is bad enough that PAL fails to protect its employees from abuse but it is worse if management were to harass Ocampo due to what it perceives a bad press on the company,” Rivera said.
Meanwhile, the Partido Manggagawa appealed to the House and Senate Labor Committees to conduct hearings in aid of legislation to protect service workers from abuse and indignities at the workplace.
“Sarah’s fight for justice is a struggle for workers dignity. In the so-called new economy dominated by service workers such as call center agents, there must be policies to safeguard employees from ill-treatment and humiliation by customers,” PM secretary-general Judy Ann Miranda said.