I thought it was 70-200 f2.8 more sharper than 70-200 f2.8 IS mk1Originally Posted by aguel
Results 21 to 30 of 45
-
10-05-2010, 01:27 AM #21C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 5,047
-
10-05-2010, 01:50 PM #22Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Posts
- 605
Originally Posted by RedbaroN
nakapalit nko sir last month eheh naay kai Sigma 50mm 1.4 Canon Mount diha? hehe
-
10-05-2010, 03:53 PM #23Junior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 434
sir hayden he didn't notice. he perceived the f4 not the 2.8 Originally Posted by hayden
-
10-05-2010, 08:41 PM #24Elite Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Posts
- 1,664
Canon for the win.
-
10-07-2010, 12:35 PM #25Banned User
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Posts
- 78
newbie question: proven na jud ni siya nga mas sharp ang F4 non-IS compared sa F4 IS mk1?
-
10-07-2010, 01:43 PM #26C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 5,047
Ang gi-compare man is ang f2.8 non IS versus f2.8 IS mkI not what you've posted above. Originally Posted by ming
newbie question: proven na jud ni siya nga mas sharp ang F4 non-IS compared sa F4 IS mk1?
-
10-07-2010, 02:40 PM #27Banned User
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Posts
- 78
aw...sorry...sa pikas thread diay to ang f4... Originally Posted by hayden
-
10-07-2010, 06:15 PM #28C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 5,047
Actually ang gipilian ani nga thread is the canon F4L vs the sigma F2.8 pero na-apil ang discussion between the canons F2.8L vs F2.8L IS mk1 sharpness Originally Posted by ming
-
10-07-2010, 08:18 PM #29C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 1,698
Kung asa ang kaya sa budget mao ang palita.. either lens can perform..
-
10-08-2010, 12:12 AM #30C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 5,601
i hope this one link can help.
Reply With Quote
Similar Threads |
|
Posting Permissions
|