YES, why? (post your reasons)
NO, why? (post your reasons)
federal countries - mas dako pa GDP ang pinas
iraq , ethiopia, sudan
brazil and Australia = ang GDP nila kai dako kaayo ug difference (same system of government )
communist countries
north koreanag lisod ila taw tungod mga ila great leader (getting worst)
Vietnam - communist state pero arrang2x ug kahimtang (improving)
same gov system different people managing the country
Ang singapore kadto ang state of johor pa nag manage pobre pero after ni take over c lee kwan yu... diha na sila nag sugod ug asenso(same government system, same place, different head of the system)
cebu = under sa administration ni tomas kai nag cge asenso maski kinsa ang presidente
cebu = nakita ang dakong difference under ni tomas ug ni alvin (same government system, same place, different people)
Cebu province = under ni lito osmena ug gwen garcia ... makita pud ang difference(same government system, same place, different people)
No this isn't the correct structure of the federal system. There is no one structure that defines all institutions in a federal arrangement, as I said before, some institutions are naturally national in scope and others are merely local. In my experience of Australia, this is what a strictly local (state) institution looks like:
Vicroads (Roads and Licensing Authority equivalent to LTO):
District -> State
Vicroads -> State of Victoria Vicroads Chief Executive
There is no national office, hence no duplication. It is a strictly local institution structure.
An example of their hybrid local/national institution structure:
Justice System:
On matters of local and criminal litigation:
District -> State
Magistrate Courts -> CA (State) -> Supreme Court (State)
On matters of federal or national and constitutional questions:
National Level Only (These suits don't go through the state courts)
Federal Courts of First Instance -> Federal CA -> Supreme Court (Federal)
So as you can see there is a different supreme court structure for issues of local and national scope. There's no duplication because the courts address different things. Duplication is only if the federal courts hear the same cases as the state courts, which isn't the case. That's why I keep saying, this duplication that you keep bringing up, is not really duplication. These aren't stupid people running these countries, they aren't going to put up a building just for the sake of having something local if it's not necessary. Local institutions for local issues. National institutions for national scope. Do you understand? The main difference between Federal and Centralized systems is that local institutions are under the direct and sole supervision of the State authority, whereas in a centralized system, everything is subject to review of the national government. Otherwise, local and national institutions exist in both systems. It's just that in a centralized system like ours, even matters of local concern like education and health, are passed onto the national government whereas in a federal system, the state government has full responsibility in these areas. There is no national Department of Education in Australia. The state governments handle education solely.
See above on the distinction between institutions with local and national scope. Many State institutions do not have a Federal counterpart, hence no duplication. The buck stops with the State Premier's office (a much more powerful version of our Governor) also called the mini-Prime Ministers. Only on federal matters does the Federal government have the final say (this involves mainly military, taxation and foreign affairs) and in many of these instances, the State government has no powers at all so again no duplication (there is no State Army or State Foreign Affairs)...
since you dont believe that national government will be equivalent to state government in a federal system. the duplication i keep stating. which will make running the government much expensive and inefficient than the present government
in your system:
local government --> federal government
cause local government will still rely on Manila (like you said we used the same infrastructure what we had now) is that decentralized?
Which why I said the number of states is subject to debate anyway...its already expensive splitting to 11 states and you want us to split equivalent to the number of our provinces.
Well I don't live in Mindanao so I'll take your word that the Catholics don't like the Muslims. Well that right there tells you there needs to be a solution that involves separating people who hate each other, because otherwise this war will cost more lives. You can complain what you want about the insurgency the fact of the matter is it's real, and they want out. The only question left is, should we let them go peacefully like Malaysia did with Singapore or will we let the bloodletting continue until the next generation?i lived in Mindanao for several years and most of my relatives. i know the situation, you think muslim lang tag-iya ng mindanao thats the problem, mao na naglagot ang mga christians tungod anang ARMM issue sunod di pa na sila kontento? Pinoy tag-iya sa pinas !! and sorry if i dont trust those MILF and other fronts nila..
Breaking away can happen in a centralized system too.. it is not the system that causes this but the grievances (perceived or real) by the affected minorities/regionists...The Daily Tribune <<< Without Fear or Favor >>> <- yesterday news
matinga pa ka nganong hinay ang progress didto.
thats the problem people supports federalism cause they feel they can break away from the Philippines. you think way conflict ana..
OT na kaau ang breakaway scenarios sorry kung ma labelled ka na anarchist.
@RMK
we dont have federal court counterpart right now.. federal court judges are appointed by the President. No State Police counter part. No State Capitol, absolutely provincial cannot be used nor combined.surely there would be a lacking facilities/infrastructure.. thats why expensive are federal government than a centralized government.
refer nalang ani sa proposal
Federalism in the Philippines - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
thats the problem with the mindanao conflict there are areas na lisod i distinguished. nganong ma sulod man ang are sa ARMM na dugay naman ang mga catholics didto. thats one reason nganong kusog si Erap sa Mindanao.
mas lisod mo break away in a centralized government, ma consider lang ni as unrest/rebellion.
kung mag kugi lang ang tawo, maka kaon man gyod. wa man ko kabati sa news nga naay nangamatay tungod kay way kaon.Nganong naa pamay walay mga kaon?
irresponsabling mga ginikanan, dili pa eskwelahon ilang mga anak.Nganong naa pamay way grado?
gi kurakot sa mga politiko ang budget para ani.Nganong kulang man ang atong mga school, reading materials ug uban pa?
kuwang ug classroom, kuwang ug magtutudlo, wa may ikasweldo kay gi kurakot naman sa tawo ang budgetNganong muabot man ug 80 ka estyudante ang kada classroom?
kay basin kurakot sad ang mga huwes.Nganong dili man timbang ang atong hostisya?
Tapolan mo sulbad ang mga awtoridad, kulang sa kahimanan, kurakot ang hustisya, loopholes sa balaod.Nganong daghan mang crimen ang wala nasulbad?
tungod kay daghan ganahan mo buhat ug crimen kay dili man sulbaron sa mga awtoridad.Nganong kulang man ang seguridad sa katawhan?
naa gyod na sa kinaiya sa tawo nga kurakot gyod.Nganong naay may mangurakot?
para dali ma datu, mao man nay kinaiya sa tawo, gusto madatu dayon, bisan di maghago.Nganong nangurakot mana cla?
Kay naa may kwarta nga pwede kurakoton.Nganong nakapangurakot mana cla?
kay nindot man ni para sa mga kurakot. ikaw kung kurakot ka, then naa ka sa pwesto ganahan kaha ka usbon ni?Nganong ni Lungtad mani ug pila na ka Decada?
In summary, ang problema nato mao jud ang kurapsyon. Ingon man si PNoy nga kung walang Corrupt, Walang Mahirap. So, mo asenso na nya ta ani.
Sovereignty resides in the people and all government authority emanates from them. The government is of the people, by the people and for the people. So, we all depend on our officials. Whenever they will not perform well in office, we are affected. Whatever happens to the economy, people are affected. Maybe, you are very rich that you don't feel the effect of economic crisis to poor people like us.
Similar Threads |
|