Future in Lapu-Lapu politics

[PascualDelaSerna]

---

Dodong suhete man diy k ug balod noh? Pero ng imong kaalam sa niini tahaw ra kaayo.
"allows the substitution of specifications as long as it is approved by the requisitioner or end-user." ?

Mao ni giingon na kun taphaw ang imo nahibalo-an sa usa ka butang mas maayo pa na magpakahilom lang ka kay daghan storya daghan sayop. Palihug basa sa mga sumusunod.

1. I allow ra ang substitution of specifications as long as IT IS ADVANTAGEOUS TO THE GOVERNMENT ! Ang Pentium IV ilisan ug Celeron? Advantageous ba na sa government? Murag dili man siguro! Ang nakabintaha ana ang supplier man siguro kay nakaminos sa presyo.

2. approved by the requisitioner or end-user.

Dili jud na totally discretion sa requisitioner or end-user Dong Erik. Ayaw kalimot sa phrase as long as IT IS ADVANTAGEOUS TO THE GOVERNMENT !

3. Kun unsa ang specs naa sa PR Dodong dili intawon na puede ma revise oi! Pag sure diha! OK hinoon na mo modeliver sila ug mas taas pa sa Pentium IV kay IT IS ADVANTAGEOUS TO THE GOVERNMENT pero nungka nga mas ubos pa sama sa Celeron

4. Ang mga maestra nidawat kay wala na sila kun ni conform ba kini sa specs or wala. KUn gipahibalo lang na sil, dili jud na sil modawat.

The computers were probably needed ASAP and delaying its release would be disadvantageous to the government, which is why the end-users opted to approve the substitution of specifications.

Don't assume that the teachers were not informed of the change of specs because when they received the computers, they signed the Memorandum Receipts (MRs) containing the detailed description and specifications of what they received.

[deretso]

Most people in Lapu-Lapu City already know the motive why Pelaez made a complained about the issue. Dili mailad ang mga tawo ana nga issue and Pelaez or Chan can't defeat Mayor Radaza.

[bearish]

The computers were probably needed ASAP and delaying its release would be disadvantageous to the government, which is why the end-users opted to approve the substitution of specifications.

Don't assume that the teachers were not informed of the change of specs because when they received the computers, they signed the Memorandum Receipts (MRs) containing the detailed description and specifications of what they received.

The more you talk like this, the more we hate your boss. This statements are an insult to our intellect. Very hearsay reasons. Mangita lang gyod mo ug katarungan aron inyong himoong sakto ang sayop. Obviously, the computer scam sa lapu-lapu is an anomalous transaction, let it be known that it's anomalous, total dili na bitaw mauwaw ang mga corrupt karon, lantaran na bitaw kaayo na sila ron. sagdi na lang kung may anomaliya to, ayaw na lang ninyo pun-i pa, na ilaron ta ninyo sa inyong mga katarungan. Duna koy igsoon na nag teach sad sa one of lapu-lapu public school and nakahibawo jud siya kung unsa ka anomalous ang maong transaction, from hardware to software... so let it be. If there is an investigation on-going in this case, we will let it take its course, but we already knew what a transaction it was.

[bearish]

Most people in Lapu-Lapu City already know the motive why Pelaez made a complained about the issue. Dili mailad ang mga tawo ana nga issue and Pelaez or Chan can't defeat Mayor Radaza.

If you talk about defeat, yes, lisod pildihon si radaza. but don't be proud if makadaog siya, because you already knew the reason why siya makadaog. There's nothing to be proud of, whoever wins among them.

[PascualDelaSerna]

The more you talk like this, the more we hate your boss. This statements are an insult to our intellect. Very hearsay reasons. Mangita lang gyod mo ug katarungan aron inyong himoong sakto ang sayop. Obviously, the computer scam sa lapu-lapu is an anomalous transaction, let it be known that it's anomalous, total dili na bitaw mauwaw ang mga corrupt karon, lantaran na bitaw kaayo na sila ron. sagdi na lang kung may anomaliya to, ayaw na lang ninyo pun-i pa, na ilaron ta ninyo sa inyong mga katarungan. Duna koy igsoon na nag teach sad sa one of lapu-lapu public school and nakahibawo jud siya kung unsa ka anomalous ang maong transaction, from hardware to software... so let it be. If there is an investigation on-going in this case, we will let it take its course, but we already knew what a transaction it was.

I didn't mean to insult your, err...intellect. Just offering explanations even if i know that you have obviously made up your mind not to see the light of reason.

I also have a cousin who teaches in one of Lapu-lapu City's public schools and she is outraged by the accusations because she doesn't see any wrongdoing in the computers that she and her classes use.
Like your sibling, she also knows and in fact teaches about hardware and software.

I guess you could say that my explanations are hearsay just as I know that yours are hearsay, too. After all, you and i do not have first-hand knowledge of the transaction. We were not there when it happened, we did not actually inspect the computers ourselves and we both merely heard issues about it from media and other second-hand sources.

Indeed, waiting for the final outcome of the investigation and the decision of the charges, if at all, by a competent court of law would be the logical and reasonable thing to do.

In the meantime therefore, let's hold our temper and not prejudge the final outcome of the whole thing. Otherwise, our views will be purely speculative, premature and open to suspicion.

[Lutong Makaw]

How can you trust a watchdog when the dog itself is rabid.

[lucky_fortune]

That's why a watchdog group rep should sit in the BAC so we will know if transactions there are really regular or not. Besides, what harm will it do if these watchdog groups will attend BAC sessions?

You talk of irregularity yet you deliberately failed to exercise your responsibility as watchdogs.

And having failed to demonstrate good citizenship which is the core principle of watchdog volunteerism, you look for a scapegoat and stab this guy Harry with unproven gossip. C'mon, let's stop chismis and go to the courts of law if we have evidence against any person!

Wala ko mosupak sa presensiya s watchdog Dong Erik. Pero sa tinoud ang ilang presensiya is for compliance sake only. Murag sa tanang Oponganon ikaw ra siguro ng wala mahibalo s tinuod O dili ba nagtago sa matood. Ang tanang supplier gi screen na daan ni Dirty Harry, unya ang kato rang mouyon sa SOP or "under the table" greement mao ang i -acredit as qualified supplier. Unya sa dili pa ang schedule sa bidding makahibalo na ang supplier kun siya ba ng makadaug or dili. Come on Dong Erik, you were not born only yesterday para dili makahibalo aning mga butanga, kahibalo man gani nag dili taga Opon, ikaw na hinoon. Anyway depensa jud to the max sa imo kay kun mapilde na sila wala na man ka trabaho.

[lucky_fortune]

The computers were probably needed ASAP and delaying its release would be disadvantageous to the government, which is why the end-users opted to approve the substitution of specifications.

Don't assume that the teachers were not informed of the change of specs because when they received the computers, they signed the Memorandum Receipts (MRs) containing the detailed description and specifications of what they received.

Dong Erik naghisgot man unta ka ug baload sa imo previous post pero wala nimo kini basaha pag-ayo. Ang unang buhaton dodong kun mopalit ang gobyerno ug butang mohimo kana sila ug Purchase Request (PR). Sa PR nasulat diha ng kompleto na specs sa ilang paliton. Inig human sa bidding mohimo dayon ug purchase order (PO) ang gobyerno diin i serve kini sa winning bidder para ideliver ang mga item nasulat sa PO. Ug kun unsa gani ang nasulat sa PO kinahanglan na tumanon jud sa supplier , puede palabwan ang specs pero nungka modeliver ug inferior na produkto.

Murag dakung sayop ang imong interpretation sa "would be disadvantageous to the government". Ang gideliver sa Kein is Celeron, pero ang presyo na gibayad sa gobyerno ang presyo sa Pentium IV, mao kana ang tinoud na "disadvantageous to the government". Ug dili ang pag delay sa release. VERY POOR m,an ang imong interpretation sa balaod dodong.

Kun ato subayon ang imong interpretation, mao kini: bahala na maalkanse ang gobyerno sa specs kay inferior, unya sa presyo pud kay ang gibayad presyo sa Pentium IV pero ang gi deliver is Celeron , basta madeliver lang ang computer! ... tsk tsk tsk , kinsa man intawon inyo adviser OI!

Mao diay na ang COA ni -issue ug Notice of Disallowance. Kahibalo ka unsa na siya dodong? Pasabot ana wala mo approve ang COA sa mao na transaction, considered na siya na null nd void. Ang pasabot niini iparefund ang total amount na 24M. tsk tsk tsk.... kinsa man intawon inyo mga IT experts ug consultant oi na dili kaila sa deperensiya sa Pentium IV ug Celeron. Mas mayo pa man siguro ang mga high school students kahibalo pa.

Uny duna pa koy lain na gisulti dong erik: Sa documentation nga nahipos sa COA wala jud gi mention didto na nag-explain na Celeeron ang gideliver sa supplier Kein. Sa ilang pagreview, ang gideliver according sa record is Pentium IV jud. Unsa man pasabot ani? Gitago ug gihilom ang kamatouran na Celeron ang gideliver dili Pentium IV. Didto ra kini nabutyag sa pag random inspect mismo sa COA sa mga high schools sa Lapulapu. tsk tsk tsk . . .

[plantze]

That's why a watchdog group rep should sit in the BAC so we will know if transactions there are really regular or not. Besides, what harm will it do if these watchdog groups will attend BAC sessions?

You talk of irregularity yet you deliberately failed to exercise your responsibility as watchdogs.

And having failed to demonstrate good citizenship which is the core principle of watchdog volunteerism, you look for a scapegoat and stab this guy Harry with unproven gossip. C'mon, let's stop chismis and go to the courts of law if we have evidence against any person!

this just my opinion... you mean without watchdog they cannot do there job properly or honestly? if this irregularities happens because there are no watchdog then they don't deserve the position they have. people put there trust to this officials and so they should give it that back without stain..

as to they unproven allegations, i think we should stop this...

[bearish]

I didn't mean to insult your, err...intellect. Just offering explanations even if i know that you have obviously made up your mind not to see the light of reason.

I also have a cousin who teaches in one of Lapu-lapu City's public schools and she is outraged by the accusations because she doesn't see any wrongdoing in the computers that she and her classes use.
Like your sibling, she also knows and in fact teaches about hardware and software.

I guess you could say that my explanations are hearsay just as I know that yours are hearsay, too. After all, you and i do not have first-hand knowledge of the transaction. We were not there when it happened, we did not actually inspect the computers ourselves and we both merely heard issues about it from media and other second-hand sources.

Indeed, waiting for the final outcome of the investigation and the decision of the charges, if at all, by a competent court of law would be the logical and reasonable thing to do.

In the meantime therefore, let's hold our temper and not prejudge the final outcome of the whole thing. Otherwise, our views will be purely speculative, premature and open to suspicion.

what do you mean by "err...intellect"? your cousin might not complain anything with regards to their use of computers. be aware that we are not talking about the use of computers, we talk about the transaction to acquire such computers, not the end-user's complaints.

you are correct, that we don't have the first hand information, but we have basis to suspect that they do hokus-pokus as there are obvious irregularities. First, the specs that was delivered is inferior to what was ordered, second, the price per unit is too high even compared to a regular quality specs. we know that it is too high as we are in the industry wherein we regularly buy computers. what is so special to this computer units when the government is purchasing them compared to private people buying?
As you see, we have basis to suspect. If you would like to offer explanations or counter our suspicions, please make it appear that you are not fooling us.

if you talk about courts of law, again, i'm sorry to say, that agency is suspicious too, specially when the involves are sharks.