ko bogets gyud aning pein oi. abi kay niingon man ang Bible nga hugaw ang dugo, para niya hugaw pud. hahaha!
kung pista gani basin kusug kaayo ni mukaon ug DUGO-DUGO si pein.
![]()
ko bogets gyud aning pein oi. abi kay niingon man ang Bible nga hugaw ang dugo, para niya hugaw pud. hahaha!
kung pista gani basin kusug kaayo ni mukaon ug DUGO-DUGO si pein.
![]()
@pein
ang moral ana sa Bible kay don't have intercourse with strangers.. kay wa ka kahibalo kung limpyo ba na sya or dili..
the Bible is not accurate, unfair kaayo na tanan babae na gi-mens kay unclean..
pero kung asawa/girlfriend nimo, wala man sa Bible gisuwat na dili ka pwede magkig-intercourse niya maski gi-mens sya.. maau man kaha ka sa Bible, can you find a verse na ginadili ang wife and husband mag-intercourse kung ga-mens ang wife? if you can find one, bilib jud ko nimo..![]()
naay risk... mapikskan na inyong mata, ma-infected... kung limpyo na, aw nganong gipagwas mana?
good question.. (pero wala japon nay risk na unclean) as for ngano mugawas..
in fact, 2/3rds of the menstrual material is re-absorbed by humans. anyway, here's a summary article from wikipedia. the references for actual medical studies are found below in the footnotes in the page from wikipedia.
All female placental mammals have a uterine lining that builds up when the animal is fertile, but is dismantled (menstruated) when the animal is infertile. Some anthropologists have questioned the energy cost of rebuilding the endometrium every fertility cycle. However, anthropologist Beverly Strassmann has proposed that the energy savings of not having to continuously maintain the uterine lining more than offsets energy cost of having to rebuild the lining in the next fertility cycle, even in species such as humans where much of the lining is lost through bleeding (overt menstruation) rather than reabsorbed (covert menstruation). However, even in humans, much of it is re-absorbed.
Many have questioned the evolution of overt menstruation in humans and related species, speculating on what advantage there could be to losing blood associated with dismantling the endometrium rather than absorbing it, as most mammals do.
Beginning in 1971, some research suggested that menstrual cycles of co-habiting human females became synchronized. A few anthropologists hypothesized that in hunter-gatherer societies, males would go on hunting journeys whilst the females of the tribe were menstruating, speculating that the females would not have been as receptive to sexual relations while menstruating. However, there is currently significant dispute as to whether menstrual synchrony exists.
Humans do, in fact, reabsorb about two-thirds of the endometrium each cycle. Strassmann asserts that overt menstruation occurs not because it is beneficial in itself. Rather, the fetal development of these species requires a more developed endometrium, one which is too thick to completely reabsorb. Strassman correlates species that have overt menstruation to those that have a large uterus relative to the adult female body size.
cge sakyan taka kay gender discrimination raman kaha ang imong nakita ana nga sugo abi ba nako pirting dakua sa isda nga imong nakuha pirti raman diayng gamaya. cge granting naay gender discrimination sa mga babaye. unya kung dili ta mutuo ug Ginoo, mawala ba ang discrimination? samot!
so kamong mga athiest, maong mu jerjer diay mo sa inyong uyab or asawa para mawala ang gender discrimination mao ba na ang imong buot ipasabot? cge granting again, nawala ang discrimination, how about respect? ni respeto ba ka ana sa babaye nga bisan gidugo tira lang gihapon ka tungod sa imong kaulit dili jud ka kahuwat?
tsk tsk tsk!![]()
i am an atheist in the sense that you put it.. i don't believe in this supernatural God na mu-bow mu tanan ug mangadyi.. for this to be called an atheist, i'm good with it.. its better than mongrels growling at who's god is better than who's.. which is by the way the cause of so many atrocities in history..
but in a different way, i'm also not strictly an atheist because i have another preconception of God, medyo pantheistic sya.. pero kaning pantheistic God, dili ni sya musulti ha na murag tawo..
--
para nimo gamay ra na ang gender discrimination? intawn sab nimo pein oi.. how comforting para sa imong "flock" na you look down on women diay just because your God tells you to do so..
ang babae kung manguwag, parehas ra na sa lalaki.. i'd be surprised hangtod karon wa japon ka kabalo ana..
wa pa siguro ka kasuway no na imong asawa/girlfriend manghagad nimo maski gi-mens sya? i've heard of girls na mubuhat ana probably because they know that it relieves menstrual cramps, and most probably because dili sila mubelieve ana gisuwat sa bible, or wala pa sila kabasa ana dapita sa bible..
unsa imong tubagon ana? imo nuon sya i-condemn na mura sya demonyita? kalooy pud sa babae, namarayg na gani kay gisakitan, unya go to hell na nuon?![]()
Similar Threads |
|