Could The Bible and Science Both be Correct?

[bluedes]

---

safe lagi kuno kung mugamit ka sa imong asawa bisan gidugo basta wala lang moy STD pero naa lagi mga risks.

Risks in having *** during periods

*
The likelihood of an HIV-infected woman’s passing the infection to her male partner is higher during her periods
*
A woman’s chances of contracting an infection, (for e.g. herpes) from her male partner, are higher during her periods.
*
*** during menstruation puts a woman at higher risk of pelvic inflammatory disease (there is already pelvic infection, and will lead to worse case which is inflammation)
*
A woman is also more likely to pass on other blood-borne diseases such as hepatitis- B or C to a partner during her period (the woman has already hepaB or C in her blood stream)
*
A woman is more likely to develop yeast or bacterial infections like candidiasis or bacterial vaginosis because the vagina's pH during menstruation is less acidic. (yeast/bacteria from the male pubic hair, especially if wala nanghugas ang male)

*** during menstruation

kasabot ka anang "higher"? mas higher ang risk nga matakdan ka or siya ug STD kung gidugo siya...tsk tsk tsk!

tanan imo gi-post, it is assumed na naa na STD present, even in small amounts.. either from the woman, or from the man..

pero if clean of any disease ang both partner, there is no risk at all..

[Pein]

tanan imo gi-post, it is assumed na naa na STD present, even in small amounts.. either from the woman, or from the man..

pero if clean of any disease ang both partner, there is no risk at all..

cge granting no risk at all, unsa diay naa ana kung magsugo ang Ginoo nga dili mugamit sa ilang asawa kung gidugo?

[bluedes]

Lev 15:19 And if a woman have an issue, and her issue in her flesh be blood, she shall be put apart seven days: and whosoever toucheth her shall be unclean until the even.

Lev 15:20 And every thing that she lieth upon in her separation shall be unclean: every thing also that she sitteth upon shall be unclean.

Lev15:21 And whosoever toucheth her bed shall wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the even.

Lev 15:22 And whosoever toucheth any thing that she sat upon shall wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the even.

Lev 15:23 And if it be on her bed, or on any thing whereon she sitteth, when he toucheth it, he shall be unclean until the even.

Lev 15:24 And if any man lie with her at all, and her flowers be upon him, he shall be unclean seven days; and all the bed whereon he lieth shall be unclean.

Lev 15:25 And if a woman have an issue of her blood many days out of the time of her separation, or if it run beyond the time of her separation; all the days of the issue of her uncleanness shall be as the days of her separation: she shall be unclean.

Lev 15:26 Every bed whereon she lieth all the days of her issue shall be unto her as the bed of her separation: and whatsoever she sitteth upon shall be unclean, as the uncleanness of her separation.

Lev 15:27 And whosoever toucheth those things shall be unclean, and shall wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the even.

Lev 15:28 But if she be cleansed of her issue, then she shall number to herself seven days, and after that she shall be clean.

Lev 15:29 And on the eighth day she shall take unto her two turtles, or two young pigeons, and bring them unto the priest, to the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.

Lev 15:30 And the priest shall offer the one for a sin offering, and the other for a burnt offering; and the priest shall make an atonement for her before the LORD for the issue of her uncleanness.

asa man diha nga dirty ang menstrual blood? taka taka lang ka dah...

from NIV

19 " 'When a woman has her regular flow of blood, the impurity of her monthly period will last seven days, and anyone who touches her will be unclean till evening.

. . .

30 In this way he will make atonement for her before the LORD for the uncleanness of her discharge.


from King James ang babae mismo ang unclean.. na-unsa.. pagkaliboga ba jud ana mga Bible oi..

pero you can pretty much connect the dots..

19 And if a woman have an issue, and her issue in her flesh be blood,

30 and the priest shall make an atonement for her before the LORD for the issue of her uncleanness.


porbida, mangita pa jud ni sya ug lusot oi.. daghan na mga superstitious myths ang Bible pein..

[bluedes]

cge granting no risk at all, unsa diay naa ana kung magsugo ang Ginoo nga dili mugamit sa ilang asawa kung gidugo?

ambot nimo.. wala man na sa akong kalibutan..

naa ra na nimo kung musunod ka sa gisulti sa religion nimo or dili.. you're not forced to have *** during menstruation just because medical science has shown that its perfectly safe..

religious taboo are hard to change.. ang kabati sa taboo kay mujudge naman gud ka na dili limpyo ang babae kay abi gi-mens sya.. pero kahibaw naman ka sa sakto tungod sa medical science, naa ra na nimo kung mutubay ka sa Bible or not.. its your religion, not mine..

[Pein]

from NIV

19 " 'When a woman has her regular flow of blood, the impurity of her monthly period will last seven days, and anyone who touches her will be unclean till evening.

. . .

30 In this way he will make atonement for her before the LORD for the uncleanness of her discharge.


from King James ang babae mismo ang unclean.. na-unsa.. pagkaliboga ba jud ana mga Bible oi..

pero you can pretty much connect the dots..

19 And if a woman have an issue, and her issue in her flesh be blood,

30 and the priest shall make an atonement for her before the LORD for the issue of her uncleanness.


porbida, mangita pa jud ni sya ug lusot oi.. daghan na mga superstitious myths ang Bible pein..

cge granting ang hugaw ang dugo, sakyan usa taka para malipay pud ka.

unsa lagi naa ana kung gidid an sa Ginoo nga dili mugamit sa iyang asawa kung naay menstruation? unsa diay naa ana nganong i issue paman jud na ninyo?

[Pein]

ambot nimo.. wala man na sa akong kalibutan..

naa ra na nimo kung musunod ka sa gisulti sa religion nimo or dili.. you're not forced to have *** during menstruation just because medical science has shown that its perfectly safe..

religious taboo are hard to change.. ang kabati sa taboo kay mujudge naman gud ka na dili limpyo ang babae kay abi gi-mens sya.. pero kahibaw naman ka sa sakto tungod sa medical science, naa ra na nimo kung mutubay ka sa Bible or not.. its your religion, not mine..

see? wala man gani diay kay tubag. nganong issue paman jud na ninyo? sayop diay nang dili ta mugamit sa atong asawa kung gidugo siya?

tsk tsk tsk!

[bluedes]

cge granting ang hugaw ang dugo, sakyan usa taka para malipay pud ka.

unsa lagi naa ana kung gidid an sa Ginoo nga dili mugamit sa iyang asawa kung naay menstruation? unsa diay naa ana nganong i issue paman jud na ninyo?

ang issue diha kay unfair ang judgment sa babae na dili sya limpyo kay abi gi-mens sya.. gender discrimination na ni..

[Pein]

ang issue diha kay unfair ang judgment sa babae na dili sya limpyo kay abi gi-mens sya.. gender discrimination na ni..

kung hugaw ang imong hunahuna, mao nay imong pagsabot. pero ako wala koy nakitang discrimination ana, kay nakasabot ko sa purpose sa Ginoo nganong ing ana ang iyang sugo. bata pa kaayo ang knowledge sa mga tawo sa una parehas ra gud nang muingon ka sa imong anak "don't talk to strangers ha", buot bang ipasabot imong gitudluan ug discrimination ang imong anak? naay mga butang nga dili nimo ma explain sa imong anak kay mao ra gihapon dili siya makasabot kay bata pa. mao pud na ang Ginoo. magsugo ang Ginoo without any explanation kay mao raman gihapon dili masabtan kay bata pa kaayo ang ilang knowledge. para madali, ayaw ug gamit sa imong asawa kung gidugo siya kay hugaw siya sa anang panahon. period.

diba nothing is exact in science? siguro sa pagkakaron makaingon pa sila nga "safe" pero wala ta kahibaw in the future naa silay madiskubrihan nga dili safe during menstruation. paabot lang...

[bluedes]

kung hugaw ang imong hunahuna, mao nay imong pagsabot. pero ako wala koy nakitang discrimination ana, kay nakasabot ko sa purpose sa Ginoo nganong ing ana ang iyang sugo. bata pa kaayo ang knowledge sa mga tawo sa una parehas ra gud nang muingon ka sa imong anak "don't talk to strangers ha", buot bang ipasabot imong gitudluan ug discrimination ang imong anak? naay mga butang nga dili nimo ma explain sa imong anak kay mao ra gihapon dili siya makasabot kay bata pa. mao pud na ang Ginoo. magsugo ang Ginoo without any explanation kay mao raman gihapon dili masabtan kay bata pa kaayo ang ilang knowledge. para madali, ayaw ug gamit sa imong asawa kung gidugo siya kay hugaw siya sa anang panahon. period.

diba nothing is exact in science? siguro sa pagkakaron makaingon pa sila nga "safe" pero wala ta kahibaw in the future naa silay madiskubrihan nga dili safe during menstruation. paabot lang...

huh? kinsa ba hugaw ug huna2x dre.. ang Bible man mismo gasulti na hugaw ang babae kung ga-mens sya.. meaning, ang Ginoo mao hugaw ug huna2x diay.. layo ra kaau na sa "don't talk to stranger na analogy" oi.. kaklaro anang generalization.. ~ any woman with her blood is unclean..

sorry bro, but when I have children, di pud ko musugo nila na walay explanation.. mao nay cause sa misunderstanding, kay walay explanation whatsoever..

mao nay kapaet sa Bible.. don't ask ngano, basta mao na na.. that's blind faith.. i dont buy into blind faith.. maybe you do, but i don't.. so pag-solo lang diha sa imong style.. dictatorial man na na style.. you're also saying that the Bible is for kids who cannot understand explanation kay wala man butangi ug explanation sa ginoo..

so, also, you're saying na you still see your girlfriend/wife na unclean kung gi-mens sya? di kaha sya ma-lain kung makahibalo siya na dili diay na tinuod?

[Banned User]

anyway, to get back on topic, Bible is text written for a religion..

I don't think it is even correct to say that the Bible is scientifically accurate, kay di man na xa based on a scientific method, nor does it have any standard units of measurements or instructions for repeatable experiments. it does state observations which may have some truth into it, and modern science has been able to demonstrate the validity of some of those truths but in a more concrete and specific (and scientifically accurate) manner.. the Bible is kinda vague on that, because its symbolism or language being used is not standardized, but based on cultural beliefs and superstitions.

but i'm not saying that one is wrong and the other is right..
the Bible and Science can both be correct, but its being presented in a different manner.. science has its ways, the bible has its scripture.

Agree w/u bro.. like a magick in theory and practice hehe....