Could The Bible and Science Both be Correct?

[bluedes]

---

really? karon imo ng bawion with cute excuses. sorry, i don't buy your excuses.

my comprehension is fine blue. Its your excuses that is making these things hard for you. daghan naman gud kaayo ka ug gi panulti nya lisod na kaayo nimo e untangle ba mao ng mamasangil dayun ka nga "we have problem sa among comprehension".

oh, i dont make excuses with you..
you think i want to cripple you intellectually.. you misunderstand what i said.. i never even said i want to cripple you intellectually, i said i dont want to cripple you intellectually.. na-gets na nimo?

by criticizing other people's POV you are indeed making this place a battleground. there you go...no more excuses please. personal or not its irrelevant. challenging other people's idea using Ad hominems and calling them BS and with intention of Crippling them intellectually is indeed making this place a battleground, and you are the one doing it.

then you're not fit to be in this forum.. this is a public forum, and everyone's post is open to criticism.. if you cannot accept criticism, then that's your problem.. not mine.. i can accept criticism, especially when its valid.. but if its not valid criticism, there's nothing to accept anymore..

and my criticism on your point of view is very valid indeed.. you claim that the bible is scientifically accurate, you can't even defend your claim of what is scientifically accurate..

saonz, mura na jud ni cotto, atras2x na lng perme, sayaw2x na lng ta ani na..
you know what, james is man enough to admit the technicalities, that's why i find it more enjoyable to talk with him.. because even with james, i accept the things he posts without contradicting him because i also know my technical limits, and he knows that..

yes I don't like what you did there, wasnt it obvious? if you want to criticize others then be ready nga e criticize pod ka. but as ive said this is nothing personal. But It seems nga you want to challenge me by stating nga you want to cripple me intellectually.

yeah, sure, bring it on, i never stopped you from criticizing me.. i am just defending myself from your baseless criticisms.. to a point na imo na gani na gi-personalan.. oh well.. but i'm just telling you that in my self-defense, i will cripple you intellectually, and i hope you will forgive me for that..

but on the other hand, i dont think i need to even do that, because personally, i think you are already intellectually crippled.. *ouch*

member nako daan blue even while attending TS. but TS came before the Order.

life and death situation para nako? hahaha hmmm? what made you think nga mao na ang sitwasyon?

yeah.. that's so sad.. if member na ka daan before ka ni attend TS, i thought ginadili sa inyo na magpamember ug lain?

so balhin2x ra diay ka ug grupo as long as angay lang sa imong gusto?

pila na kabuok imong gibalhinan bro? *tsk *tsk..

[bluedes]

Rest assure blue that I know what I am trying to claim, remember I am a former church minister.

no you can't because doing so would lead us to a different premise. instead ang issue is "does the bible contain data that are scientificall y accurate" mo adto na ta sa gubat sa definition sa techincalities of what it means to be Scientifically Accurate. I hope you can spot the difference.

I did answer your questions blue.

just because you are a former church minister still does not prove your claim..
the issue is not about the bible containing data that are scientifically accurate, the whole issue revolves around "the bible is scientifically accurate", when it simply is not.. there is no difference between Scientifically Accurate and scientifically accurate, unsa na, capital letters lng..
you use words, but are you aware of the essence they contain? asa man ka kita ug words na Science in the bible gani.. and you claim that the bible is scientifically accurate? first of all, the bible is not even based on a scientific method, how can it be scientifically accurate in whatever context you put it in..

no. what I said is still what it means. You took the sentence out of the context and gave it a different meaning totally in contrast to what the context suggest. thats called misrepresentation. violation number four.


bro you need to calm down. im not kebot.

misrepresentation?
intawn sab nimo bro oi.. kung di ka gusto mamisrepresent, taronga pud ug type imong sentence.. ask anybody else here, kaklaro ana imo gitype, unya lahi diay imo pasabot.. so you complain of misrepresentation.. maybe because you have not even presented yourself definitely..

you say "white" when what you really mean is "black"? that's a joke, right?

but don't worry, i'm not here to prove that you and kebot are one and the same person.. as much as that is so easy to do.. its no challenge..

[bluedes]

i don't want to argue with you anymore..

so think what you want to think, be happy with what you believe in..
if you can't accept my criticisms, then so be it..

but if you try to counter-attack me, i am just defending my stand for the time being..
anyway, good luck on your journey, and i hope you will find what you are looking for..

[HALIKniHUDAS]

ka alegre ani nga thread. unsaon man pod ning tao nga nagtangag sa ngalang bluedes sobra man pod kaayo ka hambugero unya diay to nagkaboang og sagang sa tira ni igso malic.

unsa man pod ka noy bluedes oi dili man diay ka kabalo mo argue puro man diay na fallacy imoha. hahaha.

intawn ako may nalooy nimo bluedes nagkaboang man tawn ka ug hatag og mga matud pang malic excuses.

bluedes dili lang kay si malic nakakita sa mong pagka hambogero ug sa imong style nga pono ug mga excuses. daghan mi noy.

tan-awa ra o..sige ka pamasangil nga dili ka take ug criticism si igso malic, nya ikaw noy ka take ka? hahahahaha....

pahuway noy oi ka dili tanan ma agi sa I.Q tarunga kuno na gamay imong E.Q noy para ma balansiya ng imong utok.

E.Q ha emotional quotient, mao ba ng spelling ana? dili ng diaper ha. E.Q timan e na noy. kuyaw sigoro ka kung mabuwagan ka ug asawa noh, minyo na ba ka?

[bluedes]

ka alegre ani nga thread. unsaon man pod ning tao nga nagtangag sa ngalang bluedes sobra man pod kaayo ka hambugero unya diay to nagkaboang og sagang sa tira ni igso malic.

unsa man pod ka noy bluedes oi dili man diay ka kabalo mo argue puro man diay na fallacy imoha. hahaha.

intawn ako may nalooy nimo bluedes nagkaboang man tawn ka ug hatag og mga matud pang malic excuses.

bluedes dili lang kay si malic nakakita sa mong pagka hambogero ug sa imong style nga pono ug mga excuses. daghan mi noy.

tan-awa ra o..sige ka pamasangil nga dili ka take ug criticism si igso malic, nya ikaw noy ka take ka? hahahahaha....

pahuway noy oi ka dili tanan ma agi sa I.Q tarunga kuno na gamay imong E.Q noy para ma balansiya ng imong utok.

E.Q ha emotional quotient, mao ba ng spelling ana? dili ng diaper ha. E.Q timan e na noy. kuyaw sigoro ka kung mabuwagan ka ug asawa noh, minyo na ba ka?

hehe.. thanks for your criticism..
i'm very fine where i am, thanks.. hope you have a nice day..

pila mo kabuok gani ka-trupo diha?

*wa nay lingaw ang personalan bro.. kung magpersonalan ka nko, maypa matulog na lng ko.. parehas ra ka ug labas ni malic ug kebot.. *tsk *tsk

[HALIKniHUDAS]

hehe.. thanks for your criticism..
i'm very fine where i am, thanks.. hope you have a nice day..

pila mo kabuok gani ka-trupo diha?

*wa nay lingaw ang personalan bro.. kung magpersonalan ka nko, maypa matulog na lng ko.. parehas ra ka ug labas ni malic ug kebot.. *tsk *tsk

oi nagmilagro hahahaha, gahisgut ra ko og E.Q natarong man ang dagan sa utok. kana noy mao nay sakto. pero sa sulod wala ta kabalo, pa okay okay haron pakitang tao nga okay ra siya. hahaha.

may pa matulog ka basin motaas taas na pod imong E.Q. pakpakan tika ha kay maayo kaayo ka mo cover up sa imong mga sayop...clap clap clap.

[bluedes]

oi nagmilagro hahahaha, gahisgut ra ko og E.Q natarong man ang dagan sa utok. kana noy mao nay sakto. pero sa sulod wala ta kabalo, pa okay okay haron pakitang tao nga okay ra siya. hahaha.

may pa matulog ka basin motaas taas na pod imong E.Q. pakpakan tika ha kay maayo kaayo ka mo cover up sa imong mga sayop...clap clap clap.

aww salamat brad..

pero imong personalan murag wa japon nay epek2x..

ngano i-cover up man nko oi, when there's nothing to cover up..

asa man si Malic? brad man mo diba, maybe you should advice him than you trying to go against me personally.. he needs your support.. coz imong personalan nko, mugrabeh ra na sa situation ni Malic diha..

[bluedes]

anyway, to get back on topic, Bible is text written for a religion..

I don't think it is even correct to say that the Bible is scientifically accurate, kay di man na xa based on a scientific method, nor does it have any standard units of measurements or instructions for repeatable experiments. it does state observations which may have some truth into it, and modern science has been able to demonstrate the validity of some of those truths but in a more concrete and specific (and scientifically accurate) manner.. the Bible is kinda vague on that, because its symbolism or language being used is not standardized, but based on cultural beliefs and superstitions.

but i'm not saying that one is wrong and the other is right..
the Bible and Science can both be correct, but its being presented in a different manner.. science has its ways, the bible has its scripture.

[HALIKniHUDAS]

aww salamat brad..

pero imong personalan murag wa japon nay epek2x..

ngano i-cover up man nko oi, when there's nothing to cover up..

asa man si Malic? brad man mo diba, maybe you should advice him than you trying to go against me personally.. he needs your support.. coz imong personalan nko, mugrabeh ra na sa situation ni Malic diha..

oi ni hinay na og ka emotional og balik hahahaha...focus noy focus....E.Q E.Q timan e na ha....

dili mi brad ni Malic noy. hahahaha... sugod na...ni gilok na pod imong utok?

[HALIKniHUDAS]

aww salamat brad..

pero imong personalan murag wa japon nay epek2x..

ngano i-cover up man nko oi, when there's nothing to cover up..

asa man si Malic? brad man mo diba, maybe you should advice him than you trying to go against me personally.. he needs your support.. coz imong personalan nko, mugrabeh ra na sa situation ni Malic diha..

oi ni hinay og og ka balik ka emotional si manoy. E.Q hmmm timan e E.Q

daghan kaayo kag angay e cover up noy. gusto man gud ka flawless ka diri mo ra ka ug babaye ba. flawless og record kono hahaha, imong posts pono kaayo og personalan.

dili mi brad ni malic noy, eng eng eng...murag naa na juy otok nga nitoyok. sa lain nimong post ingon ka si malic og kebot osa ra nya karon brad na pod mi, bwahahaha...

E.Q mister scientist E.Q....sakto na unta to ganiha imong tubag pero morag nisool napod ka gamay.