Could The Bible and Science Both be Correct?

[bluedes]

---

no challenge naman gud? lols. nice excuse.

im not here to have an intellectual battleground? oh you said you want to cripple me intellectually and you are here to criticize sa mga ponto diri nga dili ka ka oyon, blue that sounds that you are making this place a battleground. no more excuses pls just be honest to yourself para ma at peace na ka.

talk about someone being honest to oneself..

i never said i want to cripple you intellectually.. i even said I dont want to cripple you intellectually.. gets nimo? murag naa pud ka reading comprehension problem bro.. check back lng..

i'm not making this place a battleground, FYI.. its you who is making this a battleground.. in the first place, i have no personal qualms against you.. what you post here in istorya is what i am criticizing, its nothing to do with you as a person in real life..

murag ikaw ra man tingale ang naay agenda personally..
i commented on that (Vajrayana-The Path Royale) thread, and you obviously did not like my comments, so now you're taking it against me personally.. but who knows, your vendetta could have been of earlier machinery..

by the way, i hope you really got your membership to that group.. it seemed like it was very important for you na murag life/death na situation na kaau..

[kebotDiNaMute]

wa man pod na cya naka sabot! hahaha! toa napod! hahaha!

[bluedes]

bluedes best weapon is...he wants to make his opponent appear nga "they don't know what they are talking about" haha, nya siya ra ang nakasabot.

why would i even try to do that, when obvious naman kaau..

oh, you have not answered my earlier post.. can u please answer it.. pretty please?
.
.
.

i'll just have 2 simple questions for you:

1.) What is scientific accuracy?
2.) you mention Fallacies in Argument, what in particular do you mean about it?

by the way bluedes, I would like to warn you for using one of the Fallacies in Argument.

do u know what scientifically accurate really means?<---this is wrong.

In a real discussion or debate its wrong to use such question. Let the flow of the arguments decides whether a person knows what he is saying or not.

so, you mean to say you will continue talking but you don't really know what you're talking about?? hahahaha..

[Malic]

i'll just have 2 simple questions for you:

1.) What is scientific accuracy?
2.) you mention Fallacies in Argument, what in particular do you mean about it?

-Bluedes pls remember that the premise of the discussion is about scientific accuracies credited to the bible and claimed by scientists. if you want to go technical about this, this is not the right time kay mo fade away ta sa original nga premise.

-read my posts again you'll find it there.

so, you mean to say you will continue talking but you don't really know what you're talking about?? hahahaha..

no.

Let the flow of the arguments decides whether a person knows what he is saying or not.

dont take this sentence away from its context. It means to let the flow of the arguments decides w/c party is correct. As oppose to what you did.

[bluedes]

-Bluedes pls remember that the premise of the discussion is about scientific accuracies credited to the bible and claimed by scientists. if you want to go technical about this, this is not the right time kay mo fade away ta sa original nga premise.

-read my posts again you'll find it there.

that's the problem.. you claim the bible is scientifically accurate.. but you don't even know what kind of claim your making..

i will be technical, because this is a discussion of technical nature..

what is scientific accuracy? can you even prove that the bible is scientifically accurate?

seems you cannot even answer my two simple questions..

no.

Let the flow of the arguments decides whether a person knows what he is saying or not.

dont take this sentence away from its context. It means to let the flow of the arguments decides w/c party is correct. As oppose to what you did.

umm.. so what you said was actually different from what you mean now?

ooooookkkkkkkaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyy...

whatever you say kebz.. err.. Malic diay..

[kebotDiNaMute]

whatever you say kebz.. err.. Malic diay..

murag mag pa check up najud ka brad... friendly advice

[Malic]

talk about someone being honest to oneself..

i never said i want to cripple you intellectually.. i even said I dont want to cripple you intellectually.. gets nimo? murag naa pud ka reading comprehension problem bro.. check back lng..

really? karon imo ng bawion with cute excuses. sorry, i don't buy your excuses.

my comprehension is fine blue. Its your excuses that is making these things hard for you. daghan naman gud kaayo ka ug gi panulti nya lisod na kaayo nimo e untangle ba mao ng mamasangil dayun ka nga "we have problem sa among comprehension".

i'm not making this place a battleground, FYI.. its you who is making this a battleground.. in the first place, i have no personal qualms against you.. what you post here in istorya is what i am criticizing, its nothing to do with you as a person in real life..

by criticizing other people's POV you are indeed making this place a battleground. there you go...no more excuses please. personal or not its irrelevant. challenging other people's idea using Ad hominems and calling them BS and with intention of Crippling them intellectually is indeed making this place a battleground, and you are the one doing it.

murag ikaw ra man tingale ang naay agenda personally..
i commented on that (Vajrayana-The Path Royale) thread, and you obviously did not like my comments, so now you're taking it against me personally.. but who knows, your vendetta could have been of earlier machinery..

yes I don't like what you did there, wasnt it obvious? if you want to criticize others then be ready nga e criticize pod ka. but as ive said this is nothing personal. But It seems nga you want to challenge me by stating nga you want to cripple me intellectually.

by the way, i hope you really got your membership to that group.. it seemed like it was very important for you na murag life/death na situation na kaau..

member nako daan blue even while attending TS. but TS came before the Order.

life and death situation para nako? hahaha hmmm? what made you think nga mao na ang sitwasyon?

[Malic]

that's the problem.. you claim the bible is scientifically accurate.. but you don't even know what kind of claim your making..

i will be technical, because this is a discussion of technical nature..

what is scientific accuracy? can you even prove that the bible is scientifically accurate?

seems you cannot even answer my two simple questions..

Rest assure blue that I know what I am trying to claim, remember I am a former church minister.

no you can't because doing so would lead us to a different premise. instead ang issue is "does the bible contain data that are scientificall y accurate" mo adto na ta sa gubat sa definition sa techincalities of what it means to be Scientifically Accurate. I hope you can spot the difference.

I did answer your questions blue.

umm.. so what you said was actually different from what you mean now?

ooooookkkkkkkaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyy...

whatever you say kebz.. err.. Malic diay..

no. what I said is still what it means. You took the sentence out of the context and gave it a different meaning totally in contrast to what the context suggest. thats called misrepresentation. violation number four.


bro you need to calm down. im not kebot.

[SOLAGRATIA]

There is technically no conflict between science and Scripture - only a conflict between people misunderstanding the Bible and having little objective scientific background.

One quick example would be EVOLUTION - most of us probably learned from high school onwards to accept the theories proposed by evolutionists as though they were hard facts, and this simply misses the fact that they are THEORIES, not axioms.

[Malic]

hmmm... prescription calls brad? np for me...

@malic

hahaha, its easy to spot those who have agenda... he wants to show he is a scientist and would want to setup a challenge... pede pod daw boxingon...

murag naay prob imo ka storya malic... lisud tubayan... i dont know if its a disease or just a nutjob. either way he looking for attention and want us to believe is is better among the rest..

pft!

mao pod na akong na observe bro. im scared na gani kay he is calling you malic. grabe pod nga words to oi, cripple you intellectually. kuyawan man pod ta ato.

anyways bro sige kamo sa pag storya...I think im giving up na kay i want him to rest and unburden himself daghan ra ba na siya ug mga libro nga tun-an.

@bluedes

john, i am giving up...go ahead cripple me intellectually...but take my advice bro...rest and be at peace. I am not kebot.