Evolution is now A FACT OF LIFE

[Pein]

---

Most of those questions bro are already answered. It seems like your source is not really someone who is in authority to evaluate evolution. Maayo paman si bluedes ani

Your author:

Jonathan Conleigh has been researching and studying various aspects of the evolution debate for over twenty-five years. Born and raised in Maryland, he currently resides in south Florida. Mr. Conleigh attended Florida International University, and continued his research in biology and genetics at the University of Miami, with a specific emphasis in the relationship of these sciences to the theory of evolution. Mr. Conleigh has been the guest on a number of local and national radio shows and television programs, and has also conducted numerous presentations at schools and organizations in both the private and public sector.

asa raman ang tubag bro? ganina rako naghuwat diri wala man ko kitag tubag ninyo...

basaha pud ni bro oh...

http://www.evolutionhoax.com/Legalproceeding.pdf

[bluedes]

Most of those questions bro are already answered. It seems like your source is not really someone who is in authority to evaluate evolution. Maayo paman si bluedes ani

Your author:

Jonathan Conleigh has been researching and studying various aspects of the evolution debate for over twenty-five years. Born and raised in Maryland, he currently resides in south Florida. Mr. Conleigh attended Florida International University, and continued his research in biology and genetics at the University of Miami, with a specific emphasis in the relationship of these sciences to the theory of evolution. Mr. Conleigh has been the guest on a number of local and national radio shows and television programs, and has also conducted numerous presentations at schools and organizations in both the private and public sector.

thank you sir brownprose..

mao bitaw na akong gibalik2x niya ug sulti.. iyang source kay pataka ra jud na ug yawyaw.. wa gani na muskwela ug any biology related course..

read this link.. --> Darwin Central • View topic - Another self-published idiot arises

[Pein]

thank you sir brownprose..

mao bitaw na akong gibalik2x niya ug sulti.. iyang source kay pataka ra jud na ug yawyaw.. wa gani na muskwela ug any biology related course..

read this link.. --> Darwin Central • View topic - Another self-published idiot arises

giunsa lagi pag evolve sa usa ka specie into another kind of specie? example ang fish nahimong tetrapods, giunsa mana pag evolve bro?

hmmmm...

[brownprose]

naay experimentation or testing kang maipakita diri bro nga ang invertibrate ni evolve into vertibrate?

you're not being logical. it's like asking nga unsay itsura sa quarks? naa bay experimentation or testing nga makit-an nato ang quarks?

as i have said before, to prove something doesn't need to be always in a lab it can be done by evaluating evidence, observation, math and etc...the same methods used in many other disciplines in science like astro and quantum physics.

[Pein]

you're not being logical. it's like asking nga unsay itsura sa quarks? naa bay experimentation or testing nga makit-an nato ang quarks?

as i have said before, to prove something doesn't need to be always in a lab it can be done by evaluating evidence, observation, math and etc...the same methods used in many other disciplines in science like astro and quantum physics.

so giunsa man ninyo pag jump into conclusion nga ang invertibrate ni evolve into vertibrates? unsa may inyong basihan ana nga conclusion? just by observing?

[brownprose]

asa raman ang tubag bro? ganina rako naghuwat diri wala man ko kitag tubag ninyo...

basaha pud ni bro oh...

http://www.evolutionhoax.com/Legalproceeding.pdf

nakabasa nako pien...doesn't prove anything at all.

[Pein]

nakabasa nako pien...doesn't prove anything at all.

yes wala juy na prove ang evolution...

[bluedes]

giunsa lagi pag evolve sa usa ka specie into another kind of specie? example ang fish nahimong tetrapods, giunsa mana pag evolve bro?

hmmmm...

in fairness to you pein.. (i hope i-excuse nimo pgkanosebleed, kay lisod jud ni-iexplain with all the terminologies)

two major explanations are provided for this.. ikaw na lng dig up sa meaning anang mga nosebleed terms


generally speaking -- (sir brownprose already posted a lot of info for this, genetic drift, gene flow, frame shifts, etc. its all under the modern evolutionary synthesis)

The modern evolutionary synthesis (also referred to as the new synthesis, the modern synthesis, and the evolutionary synthesis) is a union of ideas from several biological specialties which forms a logical account of evolution. This synthesis has been accepted by nearly all working biologists.[1] The synthesis was produced over about a decade (1936–1947), and the development of population genetics (1918–1932) was the stimulus. This showed that Mendelian genetics was consistent with natural selection and gradual evolution. The synthesis is still, to a large extent, the current paradigm in evolutionary biology.[2]



and specifically for molecular evolution..

The neutral theory of molecular evolution is an influential theory, which was introduced with effect by Motoo Kimura in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The theory states that the vast majority of evolutionary changes at the molecular level are caused by random drift of selectively neutral mutants.[1] Although the theory was received by some as an argument against Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection, Kimura maintained, and most modern evolutionary biologists agree, that the two theories are compatible: "The theory does not deny the role of natural selection in determining the course of adaptive evolution" (Kimura, 1986). However, the theory attributes a large role to genetic drift.



all from wikipedia, btw..

[Pein]

in fairness to you pein.. (i hope i-excuse nimo pgkanosebleed, kay lisod jud ni-iexplain with all the terminologies)

two major explanations are provided for this.. ikaw na lng dig up sa meaning anang mga nosebleed terms


generally speaking -- (sir brownprose already posted a lot of info for this, genetic drift, gene flow, frame shifts, etc. its all under the modern evolutionary synthesis)

The modern evolutionary synthesis (also referred to as the new synthesis, the modern synthesis, and the evolutionary synthesis) is a union of ideas from several biological specialties which forms a logical account of evolution. This synthesis has been accepted by nearly all working biologists.[1] The synthesis was produced over about a decade (1936–1947), and the development of population genetics (1918–1932) was the stimulus. This showed that Mendelian genetics was consistent with natural selection and gradual evolution. The synthesis is still, to a large extent, the current paradigm in evolutionary biology.[2]



and specifically for molecular evolution..

The neutral theory of molecular evolution is an influential theory, which was introduced with effect by Motoo Kimura in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The theory states that the vast majority of evolutionary changes at the molecular level are caused by random drift of selectively neutral mutants.[1] Although the theory was received by some as an argument against Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection, Kimura maintained, and most modern evolutionary biologists agree, that the two theories are compatible: "The theory does not deny the role of natural selection in determining the course of adaptive evolution" (Kimura, 1986). However, the theory attributes a large role to genetic drift.



all from wikipedia, btw..

wala man gihapoy gi prove aning imong gipakita bro...sakto ka lisod jud kaayo i explain with all the terminologies kay dili gud ta mga scientist. so lets talk plain ang simple lang daw para magkasinabtanay ta. asa man ang inyong proof nga ang usa ka specie ni evolve into another kind of specie? sa example nga gihatag nako from invertibrate ni evolve into vertibrates, asa man ang inyong proof nganong naka conclude man mo nga ni evolve na siya?

[brownprose]

so giunsa man ninyo pag jump into conclusion nga ang invertibrate ni evolve into vertibrates? unsa may inyong basihan ana nga conclusion? just by observing?

observation is just one of the tools of science to know the mechanics of natural laws. appreciation of evidence is again another tool og uban pa.

i have posted a link nga naay gitawag og "directed evolution" meaning naa nay mga experiments like protein engineering wherein they use the very same principles that founded evolution like natural selection to evolve proteins or RNA for us to develop new applications in biotechnology, medicine, agriculture etc. i hope you take time to read those kay para masabtan gyud nimo at least the basics.