Over 160 Professors Refuse to Debate Creationist!

[tripwire]

---

If he debunk evolution as lie... why not create a theory?

THE HOVIND THEORY

Makes perfect sense, right?

[Existanz]

hahahaha! CREDIBILITY wise, Hovind is not believable! Look at his credentials and reasoning? Not based on CRITICAL THINKING!

But how come you believe in Dan Brown, hook line and sinker?

[bluedes]

Maybe nobody wanted to debate Hovind because he was telling the truth about the misrepresentations used in the evolution textbooks. That when it is discussed in simple language, then it shows the flaws in the science. He ask simple questions, and only shows were in the Old Testament where it was written 4,500 years ago. 4,350 years before most of the sciences theories were contrived.

textbooks have many flaws.. and it does not exist for science alone, but for all branches of study.. sometimes, the flaws are misunderstood, because the author may have wanted to explain something and represented it in a totally different manner. I have similar complaints on these also.. so its really hard to find a good textbook with little or no flaws at all. but hovind's obsession on those specific flaws he is focusing on is twisted and unhealthy. he should just report it to the proper authorities to have the book corrected, because its not enough to invalidate evolution. mura ra gud na some textbooks are really bad at explaining calculus, doesn't mean sayop na ang theories behind calculus. hovind's counter factual basis as using the Bible? Samot na masdaghan pa na ug logical inconsistencies.. its clear his intention is more religious prejudice than concern for the truthfulness of "science".. trying to push creationism as a science is full of BS jud.

I did like where Rainbow used cartoon animations to prove what has not truly shown in nature. If we change the DNA then we can make man into fish and fish into man? So that is where mermaids come from, oh yes that is a myth too. Yes after reading some of the post in this forum I am beginning to believe maybe some people did evolve from monkeys. If you thing Rainbow's cartoons prove evolution, then you are just lost. Were is the bone (fossile) evidence? The missing links? The evolutionary transitional prof? There were none, because their are none; just myth and conjecture. Sorry but if you take his presentation as prof of evolution, than you are never going to be able to see the truth. You are blinded by the smoke and mirrors.

the problem of changing DNA is not as simple as it sounds.. for example, in fish, there are a range of number of chromosomes, from 8 to 86 pairs, from smallest fish to largest fish.. in humans, we have always 23 pairs. in each chromosome, there are a number of genes in DNA sequences.. so for fish to become human, you would have to alter the DNA of fish considerably, reduce or add some chromosomes to match 23 pairs, and change the DNA sequences to match that of humans.. inject it in human embryo and voila, its practically a human already.. gone are the traces of it being fish.. but if you compare fish and human DNA, there are similarities.. Its like comparing the common letters of two different words (SENTENCE and REMEMBRANCE, their common sequence is E-N-C-E, that's 36-50% the same) but they are still very different words.

hovind left prefrontal lobe probably stopped growing somewhere during his puberty coz he does not know how to think logically anymore..

Hovind stood his ground told the truths as he knew it, and did not allow the evolution lies to cloud the subject. He asked simple questions which were not adequately answered. Because science can not answer his questions. Science with factual evidence can not prove there is no God, so why do you assume to be smarter than the sciences. If you can not disprove a fact, then that may not allow you to say "Yes", but you can not say "No"; only that the possibility exist.

maybe hovind should go ask the experts, not students who are still learning.. but no expert will talk to him coz its a waste of time..

Hovind mentioned only a few lies and misrepresentation that scientist have commited over the last 125 years to push the theory of evolution. Skeptics can laugh and scoff but it will not make you correct. Just fooled by the very lies he was exposing. Hovind never represented himself as anything but a High School teacher who believes in the Bible, and the college professors are scared of him. Why? He ask the wrong questions, and will not let them use flawed science to push false teachings. Yep, sounds like a bad man to me. Laugh at the man who has more guts and brains than you. Stupid little tadpoles.

hovind has guts, but no brains.. he's just pushing his own religious beliefs and try to package it as science..

[bluedes]

If he debunk evolution as lie... why not create a theory?

THE HOVIND THEORY

Makes perfect sense, right?

i wonder unsa reaction ni hovind ani. im sure nakabasa na xa ani..

[kebotDiNaMute]

huh? none of them can prove RIGHT? where in the world did your education come from?
evolution is a fact. it has already been accepted by the scientific community based on experiments and findings..

what you think you know about evolution is just scratching the surface..

where in the world did your education come from?
--- where in the world have you been.

it has already been accepted by the scientific community based on experiments and findings..
--- because according to them there is no other way...

what you think you know about evolution is just scratching the surface
--- maybe, and maybe not. Watch the video, i can picture you one of the students who did a good job.. but not good enough... watch it... you will understand how thier carbon dating is a lie and nobody contest... how your so called evolution is fake... yea they are talking many discipline... including genome... do you understand genome? me i cant talk about it... i don't know...
pero gipang ASAL ni hovind mga EVOLUTIONIST, puro na STUN tanan... kay daghan kaau evidence.. yet they could not refute it as a lie... so what now... true japon... hmmm..

[kebotDiNaMute]

If he debunk evolution as lie... why not create a theory?

THE HOVIND THEORY

Makes perfect sense, right?

Yes, ITS YOUR OPPORTUNITY TO REFUTE HIM... TRY! I challenge you TRY IT.


In the first place, these are scientists, spending their life to find answers... they all have theory, it so happen, hovind moving could be moving in the right direction. Maybe you have yours, we can TRY it. Don't get into conclusion that your theory of evolution is absolute, it might be FALSE, aw IT IS FALSE.

[bluedes]

it has already been accepted by the scientific community based on experiments and findings..
--- because according to them there is no other way...

no other way? are you aware of other theories of the origin of life being presented before? daghan man na kebz.. but so far, all the evidences are pointing to evolution.. and so far, because of the wealth of evidences and findings, they have already come to accept that it is evolution.. therefore its an accepted fact..

what you think you know about evolution is just scratching the surface
--- maybe, and maybe not. Watch the video, i can picture you one of the students who did a good job.. but not good enough... watch it... you will understand how thier carbon dating is a lie and nobody contest... how your so called evolution is fake... yea they are talking many discipline... including genome... do you understand genome? me i cant talk about it... i don't know...
pero gipang ASAL ni hovind mga EVOLUTIONIST, puro na STUN tanan... kay daghan kaau evidence.. yet they could not refute it as a lie... so what now... true japon... hmmm..

si hovind japon imong champion noh? let hovind go against the REAL professors, if any is kind enough to waste their time on him..

[kebotDiNaMute]

i wonder unsa reaction ni hovind ani. im sure nakabasa na xa ani..

since wala si hovind diri... aw wala natay mahimo...

blue, daghan kaau iyang claim, syaro walay sayop... examina para maklaro naa bay sayop.

Conclusion could be this:
IF NOT WRONG, It could be RIGHT... or it remains RIGHT.

Cge na... research namo pra maka balus mo sa gi buhat ni hovind... daghan kaau fake sa evolution and hovind proved it that it is FALSE, watch the video and look at carbon dating... wala jud tawon clay mahimo kundi maminaw na SAYOP ILANG CARBON DATING. (NOTE: daghan klasi mga carbon dating...)

[bluedes]

Yes, ITS YOUR OPPORTUNITY TO REFUTE HIM... TRY! I challenge you TRY IT.


In the first place, these are scientists, spending their life to find answers... they all have theory, it so happen, hovind moving could be moving in the right direction. Maybe you have yours, we can TRY it. Don't get into conclusion that your theory of evolution is absolute, it might be FALSE, aw IT IS FALSE.

the theory of evolution is never absolute.. when you say absolute, it is final and unchangeable.. that's just not it.. the theory of evolution is always open to refutes and corrections.. but so far, hovind has only been trying to advance his agenda of religion in the packaging of creationism.. if he's really concerned about refuting evolution, then he should start conducting experiments that try to disprove evolution.. where are those experiments? is he even a scientist to begin with? in science, if you do not show proof of data or experiments to disprove something, then you're not given any credibility at all.. if u want to play the game, know the rules.. dili kay buhat2x ka ug imong own rules.. the good thing about science and evolution is that the rules are fair and square.. dili manikas na circular logic parehas anang religion and faith doctrine na there's no way for you to win against faith doctrine kay reason cannot win over that man..

show me hovind conducting scientific experiments to disprove evolution, then he is being productive.. otherwise, he is just one very very noisy person who is clamoring for attention para matagaan intawn ug attention iyang creationism "science"

[kebotDiNaMute]

no other way? are you aware of other theories of the origin of life being presented before? daghan man na kebz.. but so far, all the evidences are pointing to evolution.. and so far, because of the wealth of evidences and findings, they have already come to accept that it is evolution.. therefore its an accepted fact..



si hovind japon imong champion noh? let hovind go against the REAL professors, if any is kind enough to waste their time on him..

no other way? are you aware of other theories of the origin of life being presented before? daghan man na kebz.. but so far, all the evidences are pointing to evolution.. and so far, because of the wealth of evidences and findings, they have already come to accept that it is evolution.. therefore its an accepted fact..
--- pst, gi disproven nana ni hovind. I am not saying ALL. But give me a claim, i will try my best to find your similar question to the video... then let hovind answer you... I am not forcing you to believe... but you are forcing your idea to tell me it is still TRUE. AGAIN, ITS NOT!

let hovind go against the REAL professors, if any is kind enough to waste their time on him..
--- hovind vs rainbow
--- e search sa you tube, "hovind vs"
--- those are real professors, real people, real genius see for yourself, YOU ASK FOR IT, THEN GO FOR IT. You tell me when you find hovind FAILED i want to see that.