Over 160 Professors Refuse to Debate Creationist!

[vahnhelsing]

---

naluya kog sinubay... well maau jud sya noon mutabag.. gapreprepare gud..

[brownprose]

If you've watched closely your video -- points raised by Hovind are IRRELEVANT and RELIGIOUS. No reason for profs to argue with what religion believes. Obviously, the fact that those profs didn't argue with Hovind only indicates that they didn't take him seriously. Hovind can always live with the delusion that the profs were mum about his presentation.

Hovind can also live with the delusion that he's "right" if he likes to. Besides, the scientific community has declared that EVOLUTION IS A FACT and WILL CONTINUE TO BE SO with or without the Bible

Well if you choose not to believe, you can do so... no questions asked... but at University of Berkeley they ask question, some question that are very difficult to answer. And yes nobody in that University was good enough to contend their EVOLUTION THEORY.

Bro our story here are low-ballers debate... what I had presented is an Institution a Pillar of Scientific Discoveries and Research, yet they FAILED TO DEFEND EVOLUTION. So how TRUE IS EVOLUTION? if its for real it can stand against allegation, but sad to say nobody ever remain standing.

[bluedes]

In a debate blue, there are stands/claim on each side, which will be proven and disproven along the way, it best the one will declare its claim to make it clear what is the CLAIM and what are they debating... Guess what you can skip the claim you can move on...

Hovind vs. Dr. Rainbow.
YouTube - Kent Hovind vs Rainbow part 2.

check out the first 20 minutes... they are discussing claims.

why would anyone want to debate with someone who doesn't even have his science right? ang reaction sa mga professors ani niya is he needs to go back and learn his evolution textbooks again..

[brownprose]

Btw, Hovind is also the guy who claimed that "mathematics is also a religion" D Man, can you really trust this person to talk about evolution or even christianity for that matter?

[bluedes]

Btw, Hovind is also the guy who claimed that "mathematics is also a religion" D Man, can you really trust this person to talk about evolution or even christianity for that matter?

halos tanan siguro para niya *another* religion.. this guy has some serious psychological issues IMO..

[kebotDiNaMute]

If you've watched closely your video -- points raised by Hovind are IRRELEVANT and RELIGIOUS. No reason for profs to argue with what religion believes. Obviously, the fact that those profs didn't argue with Hovind only indicates that they didn't take him seriously. Hovind can always live with the delusion that the profs were mum about his presentation.

Hovind can also live with the delusion that he's "right" if he likes to. Besides, the scientific community has declared that EVOLUTION IS A FACT and WILL CONTINUE TO BE SO with or without the Bible

In all discipline supporting EVOLUTION, non of them can prove RIGHT. Thats the problem with evolution, because we don't have a better alternative we just settle for a lie... and they are well aware of that... Those people who raised their hands have asked a very difficult question. But none of them remain standing...

FOr the die hard supporters of EVOLUTION, whats your PROOF AGAIN THAT EVO IS TRUE? hahaha, funny...

[bluedes]

In all discipline supporting EVOLUTION, non of them can prove RIGHT. Thats the problem with evolution, because we don't have a better alternative we just settle for a lie... and they are well aware of that... Those people who raised their hands have asked a very difficult question. But none of them remain standing...

FOr the die hard supporters of EVOLUTION, whats your PROOF AGAIN THAT EVO IS TRUE? hahaha, funny...

huh? none of them can prove RIGHT? where in the world did your education come from?
evolution is a fact. it has already been accepted by the scientific community based on experiments and findings..

what you think you know about evolution is just scratching the surface..

[jamesmusslewhite]

Maybe nobody wanted to debate Hovind because he was telling the truth about the misrepresentations used in the evolution textbooks. That when it is discussed in simple language, then it shows the flaws in the science. He ask simple questions, and only shows were in the Old Testament where it was written 4,500 years ago. 4,350 years before most of the sciences theories were contrived.

I did like where Rainbow used cartoon animations to prove what has not truly shown in nature. If we change the DNA then we can make man into fish and fish into man? So that is where mermaids come from, oh yes that is a myth too. Yes after reading some of the post in this forum I am beginning to believe maybe some people did evolve from monkeys. If you thing Rainbow's cartoons prove evolution, then you are just lost. Were is the bone (fossile) evidence? The missing links? The evolutionary transitional prof? There were none, because their are none; just myth and conjecture. Sorry but if you take his presentation as prof of evolution, than you are never going to be able to see the truth. You are blinded by the smoke and mirrors.

Hovind stood his ground told the truths as he knew it, and did not allow the evolution lies to cloud the subject. He asked simple questions which were not adequately answered. Because science can not answer his questions. Science with factual evidence can not prove there is no God, so why do you assume to be smarter than the sciences. If you can not disprove a fact, then that may not allow you to say "Yes", but you can not say "No"; only that the possibility exist.

Hovind mentioned only a few lies and misrepresentation that scientist have commited over the last 125 years to push the theory of evolution. Skeptics can laugh and scoff but it will not make you correct. Just fooled by the very lies he was exposing. Hovind never represented himself as anything but a High School teacher who believes in the Bible, and the college professors are scared of him. Why? He ask the wrong questions, and will not let them use flawed science to push false teachings. Yep, sounds like a bad man to me. Laugh at the man who has more guts and brains than you. Stupid little tadpoles.

[regnauld]

Hovind is not worth any reasonable professor's time. To believe Hovind is like believing we all came from cow's dung.

hahahaha! CREDIBILITY wise, Hovind is not believable! Look at his credentials and reasoning? Not based on CRITICAL THINKING!

[jamesmusslewhite]

The problem is many members need to actually read books, instead of just chewing on them. Read for yourself instead of listening and spreading the misinformation by misinformed people.