Page 183 of 184 FirstFirst ... 173180181182183184 LastLast
Results 1,821 to 1,830 of 1839
  1. #1821

    Quote Originally Posted by rcruman View Post
    i think you should need to review your understanding about from dust to dust.

    Man came from dust and will go back to dust.

    it goes like this:

    I'm from Lapu-Lapu and I will go to SM round trip then will go back to Lapu-Lapu, will it mean that all the road and places I've through is still LAPU-LAPU?

    think of it.

    Man came from dust and will go back to dust.
    don't limit the word "dust" to the dust above your hard to reach APARADOR or CABINET.

    all of us people when we die will go back to dust.

    Peace!
    sir rcruman, I don't really get your logic here. I'm confused the way you put things in perspective. You have a good question at first but your logic gives me a headache.

    My question gives you an idea why people, like yourself would understand that. Why? The belief that humans came from dust and returns to dust - this is the same line you just wrote. My question is simple sir rcruman, humans are 60, 70 or 90 percent water [whichever your knowledge leads you] but no "dust". Yes, we all turn to dust [exceptions to bones] because we live in dry land - naturally, we turn to dust but before that our body will shed bacterium that is composed of liquids then dry then really dry then dust.

    Now, would you be able to answer my question why humans are water based not dust? But I think I have an idea what your answers would be. Either you turn this to Bible study or another confusing logic.

  2. #1822
    C.I.A. regnauld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    13,099
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by tripwire View Post
    Sir Reg, I hope this helps.

    As my old professor said... in mathematical value, H2O=Life not DUST=Life.
    BINGO! yes water is life according to Biology- that the origin of life or living matter comes from water!
    Last edited by regnauld; 05-29-2009 at 10:53 AM.

  3. #1823
    C.I.A. regnauld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    13,099
    Blog Entries
    6
    The position of the Catholic Church on the theory of evolution has moved over the 150 years since the publication of Charles Darwin's Origin of Species in 1859 from a long period with no authoritative pronouncement from the Vatican, to a statement of neutrality in the 1950s, and then to more explicit acceptance in recent years. Today[update], the Church's official position remains a focus of controversy and is fairly non-specific, stating only that faith and scientific findings regarding human evolution are not in conflict, though humans are regarded as a "special creation", and that the existence of God is required to explain the spiritual component of human origins. This view falls into the spectrum of viewpoints that are grouped under the concept of theistic evolution.[1][2]


    Evolution and the Roman Catholic Church - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Pope John Paul II


    "...new findings lead us toward the recognition of evolution as more than an hypothesis."
    — John Paul II, 1996[27]


    In an October 22, 1996, address to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Pope John Paul II updated the Church's position to accept evolution of the human body:
    "In his encyclical Humani Generis (1950), my predecessor Pius XII has already affirmed that there is no conflict between evolution and the doctrine of the faith regarding man and his vocation, provided that we do not lose sight of certain fixed points....Today, more than a half-century after the appearance of that encyclical, some new findings lead us toward the recognition of evolution as more than a hypothesis. In fact it is remarkable that this theory has had progressively greater influence on the spirit of researchers, following a series of discoveries in different scholarly disciplines. The convergence in the results of these independent studies -- which was neither planned nor sought -- constitutes in itself a significant argument in favor of the theory."[27]
    Last edited by regnauld; 06-02-2009 at 02:55 PM.

  4. #1824
    i see a lot of istoryans in this thread who are victims of indoctrination.

    free your mind.

  5. #1825
    Quote Originally Posted by tripwire View Post
    sir rcruman, I don't really get your logic here. I'm confused the way you put things in perspective. You have a good question at first but your logic gives me a headache.
    I'm sorry if I've given you an headache, i didn't expect that you will understand or take my logic easily because you've your own logic already.



    Quote Originally Posted by tripwire View Post
    My question gives you an idea why people, like yourself would understand that. Why? The belief that humans came from dust and returns to dust - this is the same line you just wrote. My question is simple sir rcruman, humans are 60, 70 or 90 percent water [whichever your knowledge leads you] but no "dust". Yes, we all turn to dust [exceptions to bones] because we live in dry land - naturally, we turn to dust but before that our body will shed bacterium that is composed of liquids then dry then really dry then dust.
    because you've just sticked to your question or understanding.
    its very simple sister, try to read this again, "From dust then will return to dust".
    the elements between the word "From" and "To" is what in your mind.
    the bible didn't say that we're DUST all the time.
    That's what I mean about my example to you about going to SM from Lapu-Lapu.
    From dust... flesh with liquid inside...to dust.

    headache pa ba gihapon?


    Quote Originally Posted by tripwire View Post
    Now, would you be able to answer my question why humans are water based not dust? But I think I have an idea what your answers would be. Either you turn this to Bible study or another confusing logic.
    just read again my answer above.
    if you can't understand the word "from ... to" then there's nothing I can do.
    All of my post here are confusing to you and there's nothing I can do about it, its like a story of "a cup of tea".

    Peace!

  6. #1826
    C.I.A. regnauld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    13,099
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by rcruman View Post
    I'm sorry if I've given you an headache, i didn't expect that you will understand or take my logic easily because you've your own logic already.




    because you've just sticked to your question or understanding.
    its very simple sister, try to read this again, "From dust then will return to dust".
    the elements between the word "From" and "To" is what in your mind.
    the bible didn't say that we're DUST all the time.
    That's what I mean about my example to you about going to SM from Lapu-Lapu.
    From dust... flesh with liquid inside...to dust.

    headache pa ba gihapon?



    just read again my answer above.
    if you can't understand the word "from ... to" then there's nothing I can do.
    All of my post here are confusing to you and there's nothing I can do about it, its like a story of "a cup of tea".

    Peace!
    It's because you don't understand why we humans are made up of 70-80% of water and not dust! Try to research in Biology and not in your bible for clear and sceintific answer bradix!

  7. #1827
    Quote Originally Posted by regnauld View Post
    It's because you don't understand why we humans are made up of 70-80% of water and not dust! Try to research in Biology and not in your bible for clear and sceintific answer bradix!
    I don't understand?
    you've the same feather with tripwire.
    I've given you already my answers.
    The bible didn't say that MAN is DUST all the time.
    The bible discussed about the brain, blood, internal organs and external organs.
    from dust then when decomposed returned to dust (normal process or by nature).

    Peace!

  8. #1828
    C.I.A. regnauld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    13,099
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by rcruman View Post
    I don't understand?
    you've the same feather with tripwire.
    I've given you already my answers.
    The bible didn't say that MAN is DUST all the time.
    The bible discussed about the brain, blood, internal organs and external organs.
    from dust then when decomposed returned to dust (normal process or by nature).

    Peace!
    And where does water come from bradix? sa dust? ka alegre gud!

  9. #1829
    Quote Originally Posted by regnauld View Post
    And where does water come from bradix? sa dust? ka alegre gud!
    ikaw maoy alegre, mao na ang design sa Creator bro nga mao ang GINOO dili man ka kasabot ana nga punto kay (read 2 Corinthians 4:4).

    from dust ta gikuha og mubalik ta sa dust.
    ang word nga from ana kay kang adam nahitabo, og kitang tanan inig katapusan kay mahimong dust.

    kung imo basahon bro ang biology or anatomy of human being kay imo mahibaw-an nga liquid inside our body is the best element that would give life.

    its a process, from dust to dust, the bible didn't say that MAN is DUST all the time.

    ang imo style bro ba kay kung naa kay post aron ingon confident kaayo ka or sakto ka kay kusog kaayo ka mugamit og EMOTICONS, kung kaistorya tag personal lagmit sugsuan kaayo kaayo ka, kung dili manghiwi or ang duha ka kamot naa sa sintido nya magkapaykapay.

    Peace!

  10. #1830
    C.I.A. regnauld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    13,099
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by rcruman View Post
    ikaw maoy alegre, mao na ang design sa Creator bro nga mao ang GINOO dili man ka kasabot ana nga punto kay (read 2 Corinthians 4:4).

    from dust ta gikuha og mubalik ta sa dust.
    ang word nga from ana kay kang adam nahitabo, og kitang tanan inig katapusan kay mahimong dust.

    kung imo basahon bro ang biology or anatomy of human being kay imo mahibaw-an nga liquid inside our body is the best element that would give life.

    its a process, from dust to dust, the bible didn't say that MAN is DUST all the time.

    ang imo style bro ba kay kung naa kay post aron ingon confident kaayo ka or sakto ka kay kusog kaayo ka mugamit og EMOTICONS, kung kaistorya tag personal lagmit sugsuan kaayo kaayo ka, kung dili manghiwi or ang duha ka kamot naa sa sintido nya magkapaykapay.

    Peace!
    Naa diay tubig or H20 sa dust bradix?

  11.    Advertisement

Similar Threads

 
  1. Is Evolutionist Science worth believing?
    By IdontCare in forum Spirituality & Occult - OLDER
    Replies: 1292
    Last Post: 07-01-2009, 06:09 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
about us
We are the first Cebu Online Media.

iSTORYA.NET is Cebu's Biggest, Southern Philippines' Most Active, and the Philippines' Strongest Online Community!
follow us
#top