Man who did not abandon Tacloban passes away

[iskol_bulo24]

---

something just pooped out on my mind... mao ni kato gipatay sa talisay mga master? any lead ngano gipusil ni siya?

[BetterPhilippines2015]

So if you dont know the Person and If you dont have any IDEA if he is Good or BAD - SO WHY WE JUST appreciate the POSITIVE things his ACTION have DONE? INSTEAD of Posting something that YOU THINK MAKES you an Intelligent Ass BUT in reality your POST is Rubbish since you dont KNOW S*Hit about the Person and you dont KNOW S*Hit if he's Good or NOT

Wait....where in world did I say nga ni appreciate/not appreciate ko? Dili pwede nga naa rako sa tunga? There are 3 sides ani,
1. Ni appreciate ka
2. Wala ka ni appreciate
3. Neutral

Asa kaha ko ana? Ug i point ko sa akong mga post nga WALA ko ni appreciate ug NI appreciate ko. Wow so you want me to take side to a person I barely know? Nag list rako sa mga possibilities but never did I take side.

[BetterPhilippines2015]

You really all prove a point here:

A man matters most when he is dead. Diha pa mo appreciate once patay na ang tawo. Ug buhi pa walay paki.


Plasticity is toxic

[SioDenz]

Wait....where in world did I say nga ni appreciate/not appreciate ko? Dili pwede nga naa rako sa tunga? There are 3 sides ani,
1. Ni appreciate ka
2. Wala ka ni appreciate
3. Neutral

Asa kaha ko ana? Ug i point ko sa akong mga post nga WALA ko ni appreciate ug NI appreciate ko. Wow so you want me to take side to a person I barely know? Nag list rako sa mga possibilities but never did I take side.

You should take side on the Positive things he did since based on what you say You DOnt know HIM personally and you dont have any CLUE if he is a Good person or NOT. And its the ONLY thing we can see.

Unsa gud tawn nang NEUTRAL, meaning wala kay ika contribute? Daghan lagi kaayu kag istorya murag isa ka novel nya Neutral ra diay ka?

[BetterPhilippines2015]

You should take side on the Positive things he did since based on what you say You DOnt know HIM personally and you dont have any CLUE if he is a Good person or NOT. And its the ONLY thing we can see.

Unsa gud tawn nang NEUTRAL, meaning wala kay ika contribute? Daghan lagi kaayu kag istorya murag isa ka novel nya Neutral ra diay ka?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrality_(philosophy)

Definitely longer than my post but it's neutral. When you are in the middle, you will see both sides of the story.

[SioDenz]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrality_(philosophy)

Definitely longer than my post but it's neutral. When you are in the middle, you will see both sides of the story.

How can you see BOTH Sides if YOU yourself Said you dont know the person AND you dont know if he is Good or BAD? BOTH diay tawag nimu ana nga ang atung makita is ang single ACT itself raman?

You dont seem to know what is Neutrality...

the topic is the PERSON who did Not ABANDON Tacloban... the only FACTS you can have is HE did Not leave which seems to Agree with the title.. SO ONE SIDE wala siya NIBIYA... So when you say NEUTRAL ka, UNSAY naka BOTH SIDE sa imung pagka NEUTRAL nga ISA raman ka Side ang naay FACTS

You cannot SAY one side wala niya gi abandon kay wa man siya nibiya.. and the Other side is Gi abandon niya - Because of WHAT? walay Facts. SO how can you say you know BOTH sides nga you dont even know HIM

[yhokz101]

Naay neutral2x kintahay pero daghan ang gipang sulti.. Dli man ka matawag na neutral, playing safe lang ka. Kay if naay mo ingon na buotan imo sad e counter and so on and so fort.. So way kwenta ka storya. Lol

[SioDenz]

Naay neutral2x kintahay pero daghan ang gipang sulti.. Dli man ka matawag na neutral, playing safe lang ka. Kay if naay mo ingon na buotan imo sad e counter and so on and so fort.. So way kwenta ka storya. Lol

Just like when someone say:

Second, Kenneth Yu Uy have MORE TO LOSE if he was to abandon Tacloban.

NYA muangkon WALA diay kaila Personally. MAO guro nay NEUTRAL