Lol when you approach a problem, planning is part of the process. Just because there's a plan in place doesn't mean it's a smart or sound one. So how can you call the aforementioned plans smart, when without even considering the execution and result, it already has errors? Nobody is arguing with you that there was a plan in place. Like I pointed out in the previous post, the plans are already questionable disregarding the execution and end-result. Instead of going on a tangent about how tackling problems requires planning, why don't you refute my points? Just keep in mind there are 'smart' plans and 'dumb' plans. Ay ko ingna nga acceptable nang tira pa sagad basta naa lay plan? Even when it's a dumb one?




Reply With Quote