Strong faith in God BUT Losing hope to Religions

[SioDenz]

---

mahimo man gani ng tawo ang microscopic sperm cell in the span of 9 months, kana pa kahang single celled organism...

it didn't happen overnight...it took billion years..

pero ang pinaka impossible, ang mostorya nga bitin(bible) og flying donkey(quran)

mga ugok

Your mouth Spewing Garbage again hehe

Kusog kaayu mupaghot ug Physical Evidence sa Source - Nya if pangutan-on asa ang Physical Evidence sa Singled Celled Organism nga ni evolve into humans - WALAY Ikapakita... basura ray mugawas sa ab-ab...

Mag litanya nman nuon ug THEORY - "mahimo man gani ng tawo ang microscopic sperm cell in the span of 9 months, kana pa kahang single celled organism... " haha

Singled Celled oragnism diay nang Sperm ug Egg cell? unsaon pagamit nimu ana nga example nga in the first place they have different types and structure nman daan.... tawn sad ning 1% ra sa utok gigamit, mao ra jud tawn na abot...

try harder next time....

[porbidaman]

Wa mu nagpailad? nganu mag EFFORT man mug samok samok sa mga Theist, nganu mangugat man mug Argue about Theism or Christianity - NGA ang Fundamentals sa ATHEISM is INDIVIDUALISM man? UNSA mga LOGIC atung basehan nag ang ISA ka TAWO nihangop sa IDEA nga INDIVIDUALISM MAngusog man nuon nga MU CONVINCE sa laing mga TAWO to FOLLOW Him on his Belief? di ba kataw anan pas joke ni TEBAN na?

So Atheist who follow individualism has the URGE and concern to Convince other people to follow his ideals? WOW how noble of you.


Fundamentals of Die Hard Christians? duna diay LIST ana? paki list daw...

there's no EFFORT exerted in arguing uy hehehe we're just being polite and aiding you in stepping into REALITY
Where did you get that idea about INDIVIDUALISM being the fundamentals of atheism? maaio pa ka da

Fundamentals of a die hard christians, back read lang

[NapoleonBlownapart]

motuo ko aning evolution kay nag evolve man si santa mama.. sauna dali ra to sya ma ban karon kay taas-taas na sya ug lifespan

[BeginnerME]

Do you have a link that shows that men came from apes?

Evolution Of Man
Yes, it doesn't state exactly an "ape"

"ape" or "apealike" doesn't matter it is still a theory just like a Fictional character King Kong

[porbidaman]

Evolution Of Man
Yes, it doesn't state exactly an "ape"

"ape" or "apealike" doesn't matter it is still a theory just like a Fictional character King Kong

Ah, so its a wrong post after all.
yup, evolution is a theory just like gravity

[BeginnerME]

Ah, so its a wrong post after all.
yup, evolution is a theory just like gravity

evolution is not a theory it is a process

Man's evolution from apelike is a theory


asa ta makakita ug apelike or murag taw murag dili nga hayop?

[BeginnerME]

from the same link posted earlier...

Evolution Of Man
Evolution Of Man - The Scrutiny
The theory concerning the evolution of man is under increased scrutiny due to the persistence of gaps in the fossil record, the inability to demonstrate "life-or-death" determining advantageous genetic mutations, and the lack of experiments or observations to truly confirm the evidence for speciation. Overall, the evolution of man pervades as the accepted paradigm on the origin of man within the scientific community. This is not because it has been proven scientifically, but because alternative viewpoints bring with them metaphysical implications which go against the modern naturalistic paradigm. Nevertheless, a closer examination of the evidence reveals evolution to be increasingly less scientific and more reliant upon beliefs, not proof.

slow ko ug comprehension ha so kamo nalay sabot.

[kennyadry]

from the same link posted earlier...

Evolution Of Man
Evolution Of Man - The Scrutiny
The theory concerning the evolution of man is under increased scrutiny due to the persistence of gaps in the fossil record, the inability to demonstrate "life-or-death" determining advantageous genetic mutations, and the lack of experiments or observations to truly confirm the evidence for speciation. Overall, the evolution of man pervades as the accepted paradigm on the origin of man within the scientific community. This is not because it has been proven scientifically, but because alternative viewpoints bring with them metaphysical implications which go against the modern naturalistic paradigm. Nevertheless, a closer examination of the evidence reveals evolution to be increasingly less scientific and more reliant upon beliefs, not proof.

slow ko ug comprehension ha so kamo nalay sabot.

certainly true. I believe that theory of Darwin's evolution is a constant seeking for something to justify man's denial of God's existence. It is motivated by a belief itself, a belief that it God doesn't exist. People may not know it but Atheism is a form of religion, and their doctrine about Darwin's evolution which they contend to be scientific is so futile. I wonder how great the faith of the Atheists are. Because it takes more faith to believe that God doesn't exist than God do. How amazed I am by the faith of these atheists.

[slabs7]

lol

What a delusional christian idiot we have here LOL

Tan awa imung source na website, anti-science, anti-evolution, anti-common sense na website. UGOK BUGO

About us:
All About Science About Us


LOL

- - - Updated - - -

Nagpa sweto sweto sa evolution ang ugok na bugong uto-utong kristiyano.

Daw be unsay na hibaw-an nimo sa evolution? Kay paka ulawan tikang bugoa ka.

Kani moy klarong Lol ngano lain paman acct imong patubagon sa discussion nga wala paman to na ban or na mute....ahh kibaw nako nauwaw naka motubag using @Santa Mama account kay perme ka ma counter punch unya na igo sa upper cut. Mao gamit nalang kag new acct para kintahay naa kay kauban ug nidapig nimo hahahah intawon sad pagka despirado

Present diha sa imong evidence ayaw divert diha ug pangutana ikaw pa ang under cross examination...wala pa gani ka motubag sa mga pangutana unya ikaw mag gara2x naka ug murag kinsang swetoha...tubaga to mga pangutana kay pakaulawan sad tika

[porbidaman]

from the same link posted earlier...

Evolution Of Man
Evolution Of Man - The Scrutiny
The theory concerning the evolution of man is under increased scrutiny due to the persistence of gaps in the fossil record, the inability to demonstrate "life-or-death" determining advantageous genetic mutations, and the lack of experiments or observations to truly confirm the evidence for speciation. Overall, the evolution of man pervades as the accepted paradigm on the origin of man within the scientific community. This is not because it has been proven scientifically, but because alternative viewpoints bring with them metaphysical implications which go against the modern naturalistic paradigm. Nevertheless, a closer examination of the evidence reveals evolution to be increasingly less scientific and more reliant upon beliefs, not proof.

slow ko ug comprehension ha so kamo nalay sabot.

Do you have a link that is neutral? who takes no sides?
How come there's no identity of the writer?