Agree or disagree? Ramon Bautista, gideklara nang persona non grata sa konseho sa Davao City.

[Rakizta]

---

gipasaylo na ni duterte ni siya

[yawertzra]

gipasaylo na ni duterte ni siya

actually dili diay si Rodrigo Duterte mao nagdumot...cool ra man diay kaayo si Digong..
ang anak maoy hot..ug city council..

[new_harvey]

I'll agree with this move - declaring persona non grata for a specific individual who has damaged or perhaps insulted the people living in a particular area. Say for example, the thing that happened in davao, when Mr. Bautista insulted the ladies in Davao. Even if it's just a form of a joke, people should be mindful of their actions. Propriety is needed anywhere we go.

[RISyrnuj]

everybody deserves a second chance... forgive nalang ta to,,,, sa akoa lang na hap

[Passport]

Ga pataka ra ning mga politiko diha sa Davao. In a diplomatic sense, Persona non grata only applies to foreign individuals like diplomats. Kay kini sila, they are protected by diplomatic immunity as per the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. kung maka sala ning foreign diplomat, dili sila ma kiha or ma priso, so therefore, that's when we declare them as PNG unya ipa deport dayon.

Unya sa case ning Ramon Bautista, Filipino citizen man na siya. Legally, he can go wherever he want in his own country ... rightfully so.

korek ka dyan sir.

Duterte is a god of Davao

[FAQ]

Persona non grata can be applied to any person, not only to diplomats and aliens. For this instance, a City resolution has been passed to declare him as such.

Yes, the City of Davao just passed that resolution but I doubt its legitimacy.

On the Section 1 of the Article III in the Bill of Rights clearly states "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws."

A state may decide to declare a foreign diplomat a PNG at any time. But that only applies to foreign diplomats. What we're talking here is about a Filipino citizen has been declared as a PNG in a city that's within his country. If he were to object that resolution and take it to the court, well, there's a good chance that it may be overturned as it's absurd to restrict someone to travel to some city in his own country just because their LGU decided to declare him as PNG.

[Mr.Li]

Ga pataka ra ning mga politiko diha sa Davao. In a diplomatic sense, Persona non grata only applies to foreign individuals like diplomats. Kay kini sila, they are protected by diplomatic immunity as per the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. kung maka sala ning foreign diplomat, dili sila ma kiha or ma priso, so therefore, that's when we declare them as PNG unya ipa deport dayon.

Unya sa case ning Ramon Bautista, Filipino citizen man na siya. Legally, he can go wherever he want in his own country ... rightfully so.

Ikaw ray gapataka yot, Pwede ma persona non grata maski pinoy, na persona non grata man gani si Gloria Diaz sa cebu.

- - - Updated - - -

korek ka dyan sir.

Duterte is a god of Davao

And Annabelle Rama is a god of Cebu.

- - - Updated - - -

Yes, the City of Davao just passed that resolution but I doubt its legitimacy.

On the Section 1 of the Article III in the Bill of Rights clearly states "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws."

A state may decide to declare a foreign diplomat a PNG at any time. But that only applies to foreign diplomats. What we're talking here is about a Filipino citizen has been declared as a PNG in a city that's within his country. If he were to object that resolution and take it to the court, well, there's a good chance that it may be overturned as it's absurd to restrict someone to travel to some city in his own country just because their LGU decided to declare him as PNG.

Hala murag korek o, ikaw nalang pag konsehal sa davao kaw hahaha, maski baranggay tanod wala pa man gani mo siguro naagihan. hahaha

puyo diha yot.

[cliff_drew]

Yes, the City of Davao just passed that resolution but I doubt its legitimacy.

On the Section 1 of the Article III in the Bill of Rights clearly states "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws."

A state may decide to declare a foreign diplomat a PNG at any time. But that only applies to foreign diplomats. What we're talking here is about a Filipino citizen has been declared as a PNG in a city that's within his country. If he were to object that resolution and take it to the court, well, there's a good chance that it may be overturned as it's absurd to restrict someone to travel to some city in his own country just because their LGU decided to declare him as PNG.

I doubt that he will take this matter to the court. There were already few people who were declared PNGs in other cities here in the country. Not only this ordinance will slapped him but also this >> "CITY ORDINANCE NO. 5004: The Women Development Code of Davao City". Bottomline, wala syang kalaban-laban.

SECTION 8. Other Form of Sexual Harassment.
Other than the definition provided by RA 7877 the following constitute sexual harassment
some of which are covered by the Revised Penal Code under Acts of Lasciviousness:
1. Persistent telling of offensive jokes such as green jokes or other analogous
statements to someone who finds them offensive or humiliating;
2. Taunting a person with constant talk about *** and sexual innuendos;
3. Displaying offensive or lewd pictures and publications in the workplace;
4. Interrogating someone about sexual activities or private life; during interviews for
employment, scholarship grant or any lawful activity applied for;
5. Making offensive hand or body gestures at someone;
6. Repeatedly asking for dates despite verbal rejection;
7. Staring or leering maliciously;
8. Touching, pinching or brushing up against someone’s body unnecessarily or
deliberately;
9. Kissing or embracing someone against her will;
10. Requesting sexual favors in exchange for a good grade, obtaining a good job or
promotion, etc.;
11. Cursing, whistling or calling a woman in public with words having dirty
connotations or implications which tend to ridicule, humiliate or embarrass the
woman such as “puta”, “boring”, “peste”, etc.
12. Any other unnecessary acts during physical examinations;
13. Requiring women to wear suggestive or provocative attire during interviews such
as job hiring, promotion, and admission.

http://www.davaocity.gov.ph/igdd/dow...vao%20City.pdf

[silahis]

discretion nanas tagas davao kung unsay hukom nila aning isyuha.
looks like this is getting more attention than it deserves. ugh.

[luff101]

hahaha... Mag katawa lng ko ani..