yes.. nag ka triling na.
kung naa man jud gani life after death, si hitchhiker rai d mkaexperience ani kay na syay secret to immortality. asa na kaha to ron..
Kahadlok ra mamatay, sayang ning kinabuhi kay we only live once, pag mamatay na ka, way mahitabu mao nang realidad, way langit og way impyerno, bahalag dili ka ganahan sa imung kinabuhi karon basta buhi lang ka, at least naa kay ma feel, kay kung patay na ka, mura lag wala, mura kag natulog pero way damgo unya dili na ka kamata, ganahan ka ana?
Atubangi ang realidad na walay langit ug impyerno, ayaw mog cgeg pa uto anang mga relihiyon ninyo, gipangwartahan ra mo ana, ug kamo ray gi mind control ug gi uto uto anang mga kabuang sa relihiyon.
naay nindot bai..sa imong opinion..didto dili naka gutomon..dili maka feel ug kasakit wala na kay problema sama nalang sa pagtubag nimo sa mga replies against your opinion, dili na mag labag imong ulo unsa imong buhaton ugma.
busa unsa paman imong gipaabot? book now no reservation required![]()
same ra pud sa imung purpose nganu ning biya kas imung relihiyon..
if you see religion as something that is non-essential to human life, i see the opposite
but the purpose or reason behind the two polarities is the same. and that is to be Free.
ang question diri, is kung kinsay insakto natong duha..kaso lang di pa ni matubag nato karun in all absoluteness.
so..huwat2x lang usa ta jutay..muabot ra bitaw ta ana puhon-puhon..hehehe..
hinaot sa imung paghuwat nga dili nimu isirado imung huna-huna bahin aning mga butanga..pero ug imu jung isirado or sirado na..
aw ok ra pud.. imoha man pud na.. problema lang, what if sayop imung pagtuo?
now on the topic,
isip usa ka binuhat that is blessed or should i say has evolved with intelligence and is able to rationalize..
now in the process, we realize that we are bound to side with what is reasonable, logical.. therefore practical.
speaking of practicality in comparison between the 2 point of views..
which is more practical, to believe or not to believe in God?
Similar Threads |
|