Wifi or Wired connection?

[circles122345]

---

asa man mo mopabor nila ana. kay gusto hinlo man gud, wala ng wire wire pa mao kadecide ko e wifi nalang tanan. unsa man inyo ika suggest ana.

300mbps ang signal sa router din sa taga pc 300mbps ang signal.
same na cla ip sa router ge disable lang ang server dhcp ana.

[StingerRay]

If ok ang signal strength sa imo wifi router ug iya access point, why not. Mas mu-degrade ang signal if naay wall/obstacles hindrance pud on each areas. Depende pud sa applications sa workstation gamiton if need jud ang consistency speed sa wired LAN e.g. file server, etc.

Ask lang ko. Kanang ikaduhang router (office 2) na mu-connect sa router (office 1) kay naka-wired uplink na siya? or nakaconfigure ang router (office 2) as WLAN ug ang router (office 1) kay act as access point na nagkuha sa internet Smartbro para sa router (office 2)?

If dug-ol kuha-an sa signal ug kusog on each office sa ila tagsa ka Access Point, I prefer the 1st setup. If dghan obstacles/wall maka-hinder sa signal on each office, I prefer 2nd setup.

[circles122345]

mostly sa gamit ila internet kay mag update ra sa file gekan sss, gsis, philhealth din facebook or youtube.,

Kanang ikaduhang router (office 2) na mu-connect sa router (office 1) kay naka-wired uplink na siya? YES, wired na cross-over

[jackdi]

If 6 ra kabook ang working PC as per in the diagram, #1 is ok ra man.
Unsa diay kalay-a ang ang office 2 from office 1?

[MrCHEF18]

wired is stable wifi is portable

[circles122345]

@jackdi murag 8 ka unit ang mag tabang sa office 1. ang gelay on sa office 2 from office 1 murag 40-50mtrs.

[circles122345]

@stingeray sa office 1 ang gelay on sa pc ngadto sa router1 6-8mtrs.. ang sa office2 same lang, din naa pana office 3-4,.

[drwtsn32]

bro, naglibog ko sa imong requirements, dili man masukod nimo ang signal thru mbps it's on Mhz. On other side of the coin, mbps is ang speed sa data rate (transmission), I think you are referring to data rate, however, the speed may vary sad sa strength sa signal Mhz. Now, para maachieve nimo maximum output, a pure 802.11n 5 GHz network is recommended. The 5 GHz band has substantial capacity due to many non-overlapping radio channels and less radio interference as compared to the 2.4 GHz band. An 802.11n-only network may be impractical for many users because they need to support legacy equipment that still is 802.11b/g only. Consequently, it may be more practical in the short term to operate a mixed 802.11b/g/n network until 802.11n hardware becomes more prevalent. In a mixed-mode system, an optimal solution would be to use a dual-radio access point and place the 802.11b/g traffic on the 2.4 GHz radio and the 802.11n traffic on the 5 GHz radio. This setup assumes that all the 802.11n clients are 5 GHz capable, which isn't a requirement of the standard. A technique called "band steering" is used by some enterprise-grade APs to send 802.11n clients to the 5 GHz band, leaving the 2.4 GHz band for legacy clients. Band steering works by responding only to 5 GHz association requests and not the 2.4 GHz requests from dual-band clients. Hope klaro ni sa imo. This is how deployment strategy be done.

asa man mo mopabor nila ana. kay gusto hinlo man gud, wala ng wire wire pa mao kadecide ko e wifi nalang tanan. unsa man inyo ika suggest ana.

300mbps ang signal sa router din sa taga pc 300mbps ang signal.
same na cla ip sa router ge disable lang ang server dhcp ana.

[jackdi]

@jackdi murag 8 ka unit ang mag tabang sa office 1. ang gelay on sa office 2 from office 1 murag 40-50mtrs.

@stingeray sa office 1 ang gelay on sa pc ngadto sa router1 6-8mtrs.. ang sa office2 same lang, din naa pana office 3-4,.

This is interesting.... So, around 8 PC's per office.... that's about 32 PC's for 4 offices. Sakto bah? Nya usa ra ang source of internet?

Hinoon, if kanang imong gipasabot nga 300mbps nga signal sa router is actually the download speed, ok ra siguro Boss.

Kung ingon ani kadaghan Boss, mas maayo nga mogamit ka anang giingon ni nga Ruckus equipment. I have not used it, pero daghan nga mga iStoryan ang niingon nga garantisado kuno ni. Pero mag-andam pod ka og sakto nga budget...

----

On another angle, basin nahan ka og mag-VPN mo Boss. Each office can have a different/distant location with individual internet connection = 4 offices, 4 separate internet accounts. Then connect lang mo tanan to a common VPN.

[circles122345]

bro, naglibog ko sa imong requirements, dili man masukod nimo ang signal thru mbps it's on Mhz. On other side of the coin, mbps is ang speed sa data rate (transmission), I think you are referring to data rate, however, the speed may vary sad sa strength sa signal Mhz. Now, para maachieve nimo maximum output, a pure 802.11n 5 GHz network is recommended. The 5 GHz band has substantial capacity due to many non-overlapping radio channels and less radio interference as compared to the 2.4 GHz band. An 802.11n-only network may be impractical for many users because they need to support legacy equipment that still is 802.11b/g only. Consequently, it may be more practical in the short term to operate a mixed 802.11b/g/n network until 802.11n hardware becomes more prevalent. In a mixed-mode system, an optimal solution would be to use a dual-radio access point and place the 802.11b/g traffic on the 2.4 GHz radio and the 802.11n traffic on the 5 GHz radio. This setup assumes that all the 802.11n clients are 5 GHz capable, which isn't a requirement of the standard. A technique called "band steering" is used by some enterprise-grade APs to send 802.11n clients to the 5 GHz band, leaving the 2.4 GHz band for legacy clients. Band steering works by responding only to 5 GHz association requests and not the 2.4 GHz requests from dual-band clients. Hope klaro ni sa imo. This is how deployment strategy be done.

nindot ni pagka explained bro, ako pani balik balikon og basa pod..ehehehe