
Originally Posted by
ilovedogs
but twas like you're saying that they were equivalents. - if you talk about SALN declaration, id say there is similarity there. but with regard to the circumstances of their particular cases, it is not.
when in fact, kadtong sa court employee was a blatant show of dishonesty gyud. - and in Corona's case there was no blatant dishonesty but merely "faithful" reliance to the letter of the law?
kng naa koy 1 million unya dili ko musulti nga naa koy one million, is that tantamount to someone who has 1million but it was not his yet he took it and deposited it to his account? - the presumption in law is that if a person has a thing/property in his possession and does acts amounting to ownership of such thing/property, then he is the owner unless proven otherwise
so kng tanawn nimo all details of that case, the person was not disbarred and removed from office because she failed to declare the stall in her SALN, she was dishonest and took money that was not hers. - the non declaration formed part of the evidence to build up the case for dishonesty,it was not the only thing relied upon