All the senator-judges delivered their individual decisions well except miriam.
As i understand the senator-judges will vote "guilty" or "not guilty" and will have the floor to explain why he/she voted such.
miriam was on the other hand doing a lecture when all she has to do is explain why she gave a "not guilty" verdict.
Why lambast & humiliate the prosecution and the other senators who are on the other side of the fence?
Does she not know that a coin always has two sides?
Up to the very end she was hoping to change the other senator-judges decision with her pathetic legalisms.
Would you admire someone who shouts at the top of her voice just to let her message gets through?
I was hoping someone inside the courtroom would cover his/her ears so she can reprimand and shout "contempt".
i simply wonder why when corona as a witness walked away she did not even raise one voice. Surely she knows the rules of the court. Why did she not cry "contempt"?
I lost all my respects on her. She seems to have lost her sanity.
Sen. Lapid was much more eloquent and articulate in his speech while miriam was incoherent.
