
Originally Posted by
hitch22
Speaking of the Pope, I wanted to ask Catholics for their honest answer to this question. If that humble son of a carpenter, in whose name that palace at St. Peter's Square was built, came back and knocked on that door to stay for the night, would they let him in?
Come on, we all know the answer. They'd shoo that man away like an unwanted peasant.
Good question. Would they let him in? Probably not but I won't say that every one of them will say no, it's still possible that one of them is kind enough to let him in and stay for a night. It all depends in personality my friend.
I think that the Catholic Church as an institution is the antithesis of what Jesus was all about. Jesus hated to see holier-than-thous praying in public (Matthew 6:5-

. He eschewed displays of wealth (e.g. Pajero, all those magnificent palaces and places of worship). He didn't hand around buckets to collect money from the poor faithful while the church swims in wealth ("Give till it hurts"). Jesus Christ gave rather than took. Jesus Christ was a rebel in his time who knew what it felt like to be persecuted. And look at what the Catholic Church did throughout history...a long trail of blood of the people they persecuted and tortured and executed for the crime of having a difference of opinion. It loves power and it loves money. I think if he ever comes back, he will have something to say about the religion that bore his name.
By the way, if you go back to 30 AD, back to when Jesus was preaching in some town square or the market, and you shout "Jesus Christ!"...guess who'd acknowledge your call. Right, nobody. Jesus was a Jew and was given the Jewish name Yeshua. Wouldn't a preservation of that original name be a more respectful tribute to the person whose name you worship?
I'm just asking.
It's not the religion but some people in religion. You see, the Catholic Religion keeps on spreading Jesus Christ's words and his words are inspiring people to do good, so that means there's something that people can benefit from religion. It's just that others were using religion to gain material benefits. So it's not religion that's in question but the people who's using it for their selfish reasons..