Who is the real GOD?

[thrallala81]

---

then closed this thread TS its so very simple....

[pinoy_09]

Yes, its through religion but I don't agree that the people who wrote the Bible were just invented God out of making sense of things. Let's just take it this way. There are people who believe in Science but don't believe in God. But then Science can't merely explain how human existed, how universe, planets, stars, sun and moon were created but Bible did. Where would you believe now? Can human create these things out of their intellect?

The Bible is not a science book. It does not explain in stark detail how the universe was created. All it says is that that God created lightness and darkness out of nothing. And as if all this non-sense wasn't strange enough---the sun, moon, stars, or anything beyond the atmosphere, according to Genesis, is WATER. I could go on and on how the creation narrative is conflicting with what evidence through science has presented.

[thrallala81]

if my comment is so useless then closed this thread TS its soooo very simple....

[necrotic freak]

himo paman ka ani nga thread, continue nalang unta diri oh..

https://www.istorya.net/forums/genera...l#post10200989

[Crimson_Viper]

@all (including mods), may i.? im pretty good at this..

then closed this thread TS its so very simple....

u r a

0% troll

100% clone

200% retard

300% coward to meet me in real life.. xxxxxxxxD

[pinoy_09]

But He said, “You cannot see My face, for no man can see Me and live!” 21 Then the LORD said, “Behold, there is a place [a]by Me, and you shall stand there on the rock; 22 and it will come about, while My glory is passing by, that I will put you in the cleft of the rock and cover you with My hand until I have passed by. 23 Then I will take My hand away and you shall see My back, but My face shall not be seen.”

Exodus 33:20-23

<><><><><><><><>
John 14:7 – If you had known me, you would have known my Father also. From now on, you know him, and have seen him.”
John 14:8 – Philip said to him, “Lord, show us the Father, and that will be enough for us.”
John 14:9 – Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you such a long time, and do you not know me, Philip? He who has seen me has seen the Father. How do you say, ‘Show us the Father?’
John 14:10 Don’t you believe that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? The words that I tell you, I speak not from myself; but the Father living in me does his works.

Ah, good.

It's like telling my 6-year old daughter that Santa Claus is real. And when she ask if Santa Claus is indeed real, I would tell her "Stop asking. He's real because I've seen him. Just believe that he exist." And of course she would believe me because she's a little child. Now it would be a different story if she was an adult, wouldn't it?

[thrallala81]

@all (including mods), may i.? im pretty good at this..




u r a

0% troll

100% clone

200% retard

300% coward to meet me in real life.. xxxxxxxxD

hala..... targeting me? sorry i dont play childish game... maypa mag battle tetris ta... ur soo OT nah...

[cliff_drew]

The Bible is not a science book. It does not explain in stark detail how the universe was created. All it says is that that God created lightness and darkness out of nothing. And as if all this non-sense wasn't strange enough---the sun, moon, stars, or anything beyond the atmosphere, according to Genesis, is WATER. I could go on and on how the creation narrative is conflicting with what evidence through science has presented.

Yes, the Bible is not as detailed as Science. I can't thoroughly explain it Biblically nor scientifically. But let me ask these questions, why would humans (through Science) took so much effort to research about God's creations? Does this mean that people really wonder about these things and Science can't really explain its existence? And that's why all these so-called evidences remain as theories (Big Bang Theory, Bubble Universe / Andre Linde's Self Creating Universe, Inflationary Theory, Protouniverse, Bouncing Universe)? And that even Science contradicts itself?

[wenlove24]

The Bible is not a science book. It does not explain in stark detail how the universe was created. All it says is that that God created lightness and darkness out of nothing. And as if all this non-sense wasn't strange enough---the sun, moon, stars, or anything beyond the atmosphere, according to Genesis, is WATER. I could go on and on how the creation narrative is conflicting with what evidence through science has presented.

Because Genesis is not making scientific assertions, it is wrong to charge Genesis with scientific error. If someone draws erroneous scientific conclusions from a misreading of Genesis, the error belongs not to Genesis but to the person who has misread it.

Therefore we should not say that Genesis does not have "full scientific accuracy"—a statement that is bound to disturb the faithful and undermine their confidence in Scripture. Instead we should say that Genesis is not making scientific assertions and that we will draw erroneous conclusions if we treat the text as though it were.

The same applies to statements such as "We should not expect total accuracy from the Bible." In fact we should, for everything asserted in Sacred Scripture is asserted by the Holy Spirit, and he does not make mistakes.

The burden is on us to recognize what the Spirit is and is not asserting, and we may stumble into error if we make a mistake in doing this.

This applies to science or history or faith or morals or salvation or any other subject. The error belongs to us as interpreters, not to the Holy Spirit and not to the Scripture that he inspired.

[kajrot1]

explore the whole universe then ull find the answer....