Everything about : RH Bill ( Reproductive Health Bill)

[Romeojin]

parehas ra sila analogy, choice ans protection...... condom and contraceptive is a also for protection from unwanted pregnancies. the analogy their is for protection and choice.....

brad gibasa ko ang kanang "sexual revolution", you are a pessimistic person.. we will noe going their, thats is the work of the church and our parents to guide us.....

RH Bill will help promote family wellness, and help us especially the poor.

naa ko daghan pangutana nimo, wa p jud nimo tubaga....

so we talking of protection na ron, i thought sa buy ug use lang ta hehe. you buy condom dili na hinuon mag ***

when you buy/ask for BC you gonna used it, it promote sexual liberation. the gun you cant just fire it at will unless you want to go to jail.

sayona nimo noh kadagahan taay ko gi reply, moingon ra ka we are not going there. mo diretso lang ka conclude.. more contraceptives giveaways or widespread use of BC will not promote ***. naay link ana?

wa ko problema sa good part of the bill and bad part and flaw ang akong concern. please dont forget that.

mas daghan ko pangutana wa nimo gitubag !

[unsay_ngalan_nimo]

ganhan gyud ko sa GMA newstv..

[cliff_drew]

if this RH push through this will be an expensive case study just to realize we didnt solve overpopulation.

Do you know how much our government spent for healthcare? Based on the research by Likhaan and the Guttmacher Institute:

http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/2009/04/15/IB_MWCNP.pdf (page 7)

Medical costs for all women experiencing an unintended pregnancy in 2008 (at PhilHealth rates for normal and cesarean births, newborn care and treatment of abortion complications) were at least P3.5 billion. Maternal and newborn care related to intended pregnancies cost an additional P3.9 billion. Thus, expenditures on pregnancy-related services, plus the current cost of contraceptive services (P1.9 billion), total at least P9.3 billion (Figure 4). In contrast, without current contraceptive use, the cost of medical care for pregnant women would be at least P12.1 billion.

If all women at risk for unintended pregnancy used only modern NFP methods, total costs would rise from the current P9.3 billion to P10.0 billion, because spending on family planning would increase without a large reduction in medical care for unintended pregnancies.

However, increasing funding to enable all women at risk to use either the current mix of contraceptives or modern methods only would reduce net spending. In a scenario using the current mix of modern and traditional methods, spending on family planning would increase from P1.9 billion to P2.7 billion, but medical costs for unintended pregnancies would fall from P3.5 billion to P1.6 billion—a net savings of P1.1 billion. If all women at risk used modern contraceptive methods, including a small proportion using modern NFP methods, spending on family planning would increase from P1.9 billion to P4.0 billion, but medical costs for unintended pregnancies would fall from P3.5 billion to P0.6 billion. Total costs would drop from P9.3 billion to P8.5 billion—a net savings of P0.8 billion.

Only 38% of women in the Philippines deliver their babies in a health facility, and levels are especially low in ARMM (11%), MIMAROPA (16%) and Zamboanga (16%; data not shown). Reducing unintended pregnancies would make the goal of having all pregnant women receive skilled, facilitybased care during pregnancy and delivery more attainable. Providing facility-based care for all pregnant women today would roughly double the annual costs of their medical care from the current minimum of P7.4 billion to P15.9 billion. Increasing the ability of women and their partners to use contraceptives, however, would reduce the costs of medical care for all pregnant women. The cost of medical care would decline slightly from P15.9 billion to P14.9 billion if all women at risk used modern NFP methods, to P11.7 billion if they used the current mix of contraceptive methods, and to only P9.6 billion if they used modern methods in the same proportions as today’s users.

Reducing unintended pregnancies by meeting women’s need for contraception, especially by providing highly effective methods, also reduces stress on education, health care and other social services.4,20,21 Savings in these areas, as well as in pregnancy-related medical care, can be used to improve and expand a range of public services, making it easier for the Philippines to achieve the Millennium Development Goals and other development objectives.

From this study, does RH isn't promoting a cost-effective public health spending?

[Romeojin]

Kung wala kay nasabtan sa ako gi-ingon, imo sad na. Basta klaro akong point.
Pwede nimo basa-basahon ug balik para masabtan nimo.
Moral values are mostly based on your religion and culture. Ayaw na i-deny. Not unless wala kay religion and culture, basin maka argue pa ka.
The "no pork" topic is completely in sync with what you are talking about.
You just need to analyze and not just interpret it word for word.

And yes, RH bill will not make people think of PMS. Babaw ra kaayo na nga rason nga ang RH bill ang naka palami maong ganahan ka mu-sulay bisan dili minyo.

Ang inyo palang protestahan ana inyong fight against PMS kay ang mga free TV media nga s*x and seduction ang content sa mga shows... daghan pa malipay.

di diay ka mobadlong na mag PMS or mangayo ug BC imong mga anak? mangayo as in gamiton gyud ba just to be clear. If mubadlong ka then luoy ka sa RH bill, the bill stated no discrimination.

What makes you think nagpa PMS ang mga tao ron without RH? and why would you say na with contraceptive availables through RH dili na mag ***?

Kung rampant na gyud PMS and *** are embedded na gyud sa atong media wa na ta mahimo, but adding free contraceptives it will just fuel the fire. ka g naka?

[Saga]

what could go wrong if you educate the people about reproductive health?

what could go wrong if you educate the teens about the consequences of having pms or unprotected s3x?

what could go wrong?

is there a study that shows that because of s3x education there are more teens doing it?

[Romeojin]

Do you know how much our government spent for healthcare? Based on the research by Likhaan and the Guttmacher Institute:

http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/2009/04/15/IB_MWCNP.pdf (page 7)



From this study, does RH isn't a cost-effective public health spending?

i have no objection on the maternal health care portion of the bill, as long no abortion operation lagi.

how much can we save here? compare to what 5B yearly with RH plus hospital, clinics and other infrastructure.

[cliff_drew]

i have no objection on the maternal health care portion of the bill, as long no abortion operation lagi.

how much can we save here? compare to what 5B yearly with RH plus hospital, clinics and other infrastructure.

We can save billions of pesos of medical costs. Gi mention naman sa akong post.

[Romeojin]

what could go wrong if you educate the people about reproductive health?

educate the teens about the consequences of having pms or unprotected s3x?

what could go wrong?

is there a study that shows that because s3x education lead to more PMS among teens?

look the parents and the Church teaches us about PMS, the school they can tried that as well with *** ed. No problem . Still why we have to give them access to BC without discrimination?

backread na lang anang study, but presented Freudian statement; statistics in the US and UK; an article saying its not lack of info but they had more info thats why they are having ***; etc.


ugma na sad lol.

[Romeojin]

We can save billions of pesos of medical costs. Gi mention naman sa akong post.

i know. but the RH cost and maintenance yearly and initial investments that should also be studied. We saving more or what?

i will get back to you tomorrow.

[vipvip68]

Just saw pacquaio's interpellation on the rh bill. Mas naa pay sense ang posts ni keyboardwarrior kay ni pacman. Lol

Most people against the bill are just nitpicking at some provisions they dont agree with and there are many revisions being done to make the bill better suited to all.

Just learned that they plan to remove the requirement on businesses to provide rh services.