Ang gipangbaligya sa tpc kay kadtong Fermi based. Any idea asa ko makapalit sa Kepler based 630? Planning to use it for physx. Mas gamay pud siya power consumption. 25w vs 65w.
Results 1 to 10 of 12
Thread: GT 630 ( Kepler ) not Fermi
-
08-17-2013, 10:00 PM #1C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Gender
- Posts
- 3,985
GT 630 ( Kepler ) not Fermi
-
08-17-2013, 10:08 PM #2C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 10,898
pangita-on ang naka kepler na GT 630 bro... pero, naa ra man gyud hinon na sila... basin order basis... try ask sa mga sellers sa TPC or sa CAC. basin maka order...
by the way, nag release ani ug daghan na stocks ang Galaxy...Last edited by lloyd_joy; 08-17-2013 at 10:10 PM.
-
08-17-2013, 10:14 PM #3C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Gender
- Posts
- 3,985
Maskin ang GT 640 baligya fermi ghapon. Sulay2 ra man pud ni akoa, na curious ko how it can handle physx.
-
08-17-2013, 10:19 PM #4C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 10,898
ah i see... gamay ra gyud kaon ug kuryente ang GT 630 na Kepler kay rated at 25W lang sya... mga karaan diay ang stocks nila sa GT 640 pud? Fermi based man tong mga una'ng gipang release sa GT 640... based sa nag gamit ug physx card, ok ang GT 640 (kepler based) kay daghan sya'g cuda cores compared sa GT 630 na Fermi based... pero, mas nice ang GT 630 na Kepler based kay low power then 384 cuda cores lang gihapon... mao ni sya ang bang for the money for a dedicated physx card... barato'g price & gamay kaon ug kuryente... pero, mas nice ang mas pas2x for a dedicated physx card... like the GTX 650 Ti... mahal na lang pud ni oi for a dedicated physx card... sayang ang money...
Last edited by lloyd_joy; 08-18-2013 at 01:03 AM.
-
08-17-2013, 10:32 PM #5C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Gender
- Posts
- 3,985
Well if it turned out slow, I can always sell it. Daghan man gud gapangutana unsay lowest card nga pwede, kay like before naay certain point pud na wa nay difference ang paspas nga card dedicated for physx. For experience nalang pud para naa koy sakto nga matubag.
-
08-17-2013, 10:35 PM #6C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 10,898
yup, a slow card (DDR3 based like the GT 630 Kepler) is more than enough for a dedicated physx card gyud...
-
08-17-2013, 10:37 PM #7C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Gender
- Posts
- 3,985
Saona enough naman ang GT 240 and performance wise, the GT 630 should be faster.
-
08-18-2013, 01:06 AM #8C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 10,898
diri, tag 2.5K php ang GT 630 1GB DDR3 (Kepler)... 64 bit ra man ni sya bro but w/ 384 cuda cores... no idea if maka hinder ba ni's physx computation nya ang 64 bus width... duda ko, dili ra man siguro... as long as daghan ug cuda cores for physx computation, ok ra sya...
Last edited by lloyd_joy; 08-18-2013 at 01:16 AM.
-
08-18-2013, 01:21 AM #9C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Gender
- Posts
- 3,985
Mao na ako gusto mahibal-an. Dilang if madayon nako ug test post nako ako results diri. Anyway same ra diay price sa fermi.
Originally Posted by lloyd_joy
-
08-18-2013, 08:24 AM #10C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Gender
- Posts
- 8,871
nindot d i dha sir, Originally Posted by lloyd_joy
mura man ug GT640 ngari sir, 384cores
the gt630 here have about 96 murag GT220
but 128bit ang GT630here
i have bought 4 for my client and sa opis
and 2 for GT640.
nakabasa ko b4,it says about bit in card as physix
naa gyud difference sa performance.
...
ako kaha pud try ako gt8800 as physix..Last edited by butitoy; 08-18-2013 at 08:27 AM.
Reply With Quote Advertisement
Similar Threads |
|
Posting Permissions
|