The Fraud of Evolution

[seven_segment]

---

The Fraud of Evolution

http://thetrumpet.com/index.php?page=article&id=3218

How science cheats at proving its pet theory

The word theory, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, is “a hypothesis that has been confirmed or established by observation or experiment, and is propounded or accepted as accounting for the known facts.” To be considered a theory, something must be “confirmed” and account for the “known facts.” Evolution has been neither, as shall be proven herein....

...Most biology textbooks have a section about evolution. One of the favorite “proofs” commonly included in such a chapter is the similarity of embryos from a variety of animals and man. This information may be traced back to embryologist Ernest Haeckel in the mid-1800s. Haeckel published pictures he claimed were the embryos of a fish, salamander, tortoise, chicken, hog, calf, rabbit and human being. He tried to show that the embryos look similar in the early stages of development. This was supposed to show they all had a common ancestor.

The problem is, the pictures were not accurate; in fact, they were faked. Jonathan Wells wrote in his book Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth?, “When Haeckel’s embryos are viewed side by side with actual embryos, there can be no doubt that his drawings were deliberately distorted to fit his theory.”

This fraud was known and published as early as 1894 by Professor Adam Sedgwick of Cambridge University, who wrote that the similarities reported by Haeckel are “not in accordance with the facts of development.”

Scientists continue to find fault with the “evolutionary evidence” created by Haeckel. In 1977, “Erich Blechschmidt noted: ‘The early stages of human embryonic development are distinct from the early development of other species.’ And in 1987, Richard Elinson reported that frogs, chicks, and mice ‘are radically different in such fundamental properties as egg size, fertilization mechanisms, cleavage patterns, and [gastrulation] movements’” (Wells, op. cit.).

The curator of the fossil collection at Harvard’s Museum of Comparative Zoology, Stephen Jay Gould, wrote about the Haeckel fraud: “Haeckel had exaggerated the similarities by idealizations and omissions. He also, in some cases—in a procedure that can only be called fraudulent—simply copied the same figure over and over again” (Natural History, March 2000). Gould further commented on the deleterious effect of such “inaccuracy” when it is reproduced in a textbook and not corrected: “The smallest compromise in dumbing down by inaccuracy destroys integrity and places an author upon a slippery slope of no return.”

Evolutionists suggest that many different genetic changes occurred, but only the changes that caused an advantage of some sort remained. In other words, the animals with the weakest changes died out and the stronger, more beneficially changed animals lived on and continued to change...

Here is where the links are missing. If reptiles somehow changed and became mammals, there should be fossils representing the intermediate steps. But there are none. ..

Duane T. Gish, Ph.D., in his book Evolution: The Fossils Still Say NO!, states, “Even though this transition is supposed to have taken 100 million years, not a single intermediate [fossil] has ever been discovered.”...

Jesus Christ made it clear that we can be set free from the lies of this world. Seeking real truth is the only way to obtain freedom from ignorance. As Christ said in John 8:32, “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”

[akosabni]

i definitely agree on your last statement

Jesus Christ made it clear that we can be set free from the lies of this world. Seeking real truth is the only way to obtain freedom from ignorance. As Christ said in John 8:32, “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”

YOU, WE should seek the truth to make make US free

[899]

wow this is very helpful!

this is not the first time that science cheated to prove evolution, The greatest hoax of all was and still is The neanderthal man.

Some bones came from different types of animals.


OT: ever heard of the term "out-of-place artifacts"? well these are the artifacts that is inconsistent to the theory of the evolutionists. They are hiding it instead of showing it publicly in the museums they labeled it as out-of-place and hid it someplce. For example there was an artifact that shows both footprints of a dinosaur and of a human being but since they believe that humans couldnt live during the time of the dinos they set the artifact aside and put it someplace where all out-of-place artifacts are in. tsk tsk! If they want to tell us the truth why are they so afraid of showing these things to the public?

[climber_diver]

personally i find evolution a very nice idea. but truth has nothing to do with personal preference.

i have serious doubts regarding evolution, just as i am very critical towards religions in general and judeo-christianity in particular. but my doubt regarding evolution is more symantic rather than biblical. or to put it another way, i have no bias in favor of religion to the point of interpreting anything to affirm my prejudice.

"evolution" might be more than just process of change. it suggests change for the better. given the millennia of human existence on this planet and the overwhelming mediocrity among human population, it seems unlikely that the Homo Sapiens is the apex of evolution -- the highest point of a process of change for the better.

[nosyac]

there is/are no fraud in evolution it's just some don't believe on what they are knowing at.

[899]

@nosyac

There is/are fraud in evolution. Think again!

What bout the evidence mentioned above? You think that we just made this up? Its all over the news specially the neanderthal man.

[nosyac]

@nosyac

There is/are fraud in evolution. Think again!

What bout the evidence mentioned above? You think that we just made this up? Its all over the news specially the neanderthal man.

YUP!!! made up alright!

[The_Child]

wow this is very helpful!

this is not the first time that science cheated to prove evolution, The greatest hoax of all was and still is The neanderthal man.

Some bones came from different types of animals.


OT: ever heard of the term "out-of-place artifacts"? well these are the artifacts that is inconsistent to the theory of the evolutionists. They are hiding it instead of showing it publicly in the museums they labeled it as out-of-place and hid it someplce. For example there was an artifact that shows both footprints of a dinosaur and of a human being but since they believe that humans couldnt live during the time of the dinos they set the artifact aside and put it someplace where all out-of-place artifacts are in. tsk tsk! If they want to tell us the truth why are they so afraid of showing these things to the public?

neaderthal man? or Piltdown Man?

[wAtSeR]

ngeks karon pa q kabaw ani..very informative..hehehe..pero dli ra bya na ang only theory of evolution..

[899]

@The_child

Both