If you look carefully enough, you may notice that things are changing. It first became apparent shortly after the release of Nehalem. Intel bifurcated the performance desktop space by embracing a two-socket strategy, something we'd never seen from Intel and only once from AMD in the early Athlon 64 days (Socket-940 and Socket-754).
LGA-1366 came first, but by the time LGA-1156 arrived a year later it no longer made sense to recommend Intel's high-end Nehalem platform. Lynnfield was nearly as fast and the entire platform was more affordable.
When
Sandy Bridge launched earlier this year, all we got was the mainstream desktop version. No one complained because it was fast enough, but we all knew an ultra high-end desktop part was in the works. A true successor to Nehalem's LGA-1366 platform for those who waited all this time.
Left to right: Sandy Bridge E, Gulftown, Sandy Bridge
After some delays, Sandy Bridge E is finally here. The platform is actually pretty simple to talk about. There's a new socket: LGA-2011, a new chipset Intel's X79 and of course the Sandy Bridge E CPU itself. We'll start at the CPU.
Source:
AnandTech - Intel Core i7 3960X (Sandy Bridge E) Review: Keeping the High End Alive
APPLICATION PERFORMANCE
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5091/i...gh-end-alive/5
GAMING PERFORMANCE
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5091/i...gh-end-alive/6
Intel Core i7 3960X (Sandy Bridge E) Review: Keeping the High End Alive
Reply With Quote
Posting Permissions
