I think it would be a good time to explore the topic of what we may dislike about FMA.
For me, there's nothing in the Art itself I dislike. Rather, its the people who seem to be drawn to this Art since FMA became the flavor of the month. Back in the day, before videos and the internet; before everyone was a guru, sultan guru, punong guru, etc.; before everyone and his brother became a knife fighting expert; FMAer's were a rare breed (at least around here). Back then, anyone who seriously followed Kali/escrima/silat had to have some serious "underground" connections. The guys who had the training were very secretive about it, and were extremely reluctant to even talk about what they knew, let alone display it.

Originally Posted by
JD
I basically started in 1987, quite by accident. I didn't know there were different styles/systems, I didn't know how many drills there were. Each class that I learned even one new technique - I came away feeling like I had found buried treasure. I remember how honored i felt to even be a small part of such a wonderful tradition. There was no inter- or intra-style politics. Just training and a love for the Art.
Woe unto the present generation. Now everyone is a guru. Everyone has instructional videos. You can observe the online discussions of absolute idiots who have never even been in a fight or armchair wannabe "tactical combat" experts argue over who has the best knife fighting system and/or what system is the best for combat.
I really pray that another ninjutsu-like trend sweeps the martial arts world, so that we can have our Art back from the masses. I say we go back underground where we belong.
that's my rant. Anyone else care to share?