Fault in Evolution Theory

[kebotDiNaMute]

---

1. The fossil record is false.
- These paleontologists and archaeologist use a faulty dating method. They measure the ground around the fossil or specimen because the fossil is totally contaminated by the matter around the fossil. Thus if you measure the age of the material around the fossil, you are not measuring the fossil date. You are measuring the date of the rocks, ground, dirt, sand, hardened lava and such. If you fall on the ground and die standing on a 12,000,000 year old strata, and the sand covers you and hardens to a rock, then they did up your bones 3,000 years later and they measure the age of the strata you were standing on they would say your bones are 12,000,000 years old, the same date as the strata you were standing on when you died.

2. non-adaptive mutations
- "The research not only increases our understanding of human evolution, but also suggests that many techniques used by evolutionary biologists to detect selection may be flawed," noted Uppsala's Matthew Webster.

"Describing their results in the journal PLoS Biology"

Biologists mull rapid, non-adaptive gene mutations

3. Fossils unmistakably human were discovered in strata much "older" than the alleged ape-men.

4. Ecology and interdependence between organisms cause additional problems for evolutionists.

5. The magnetic field of the earth is decaying at a measurable rate. If date back billions of years, it could have been a star..

6. THERMODYNAMICS VS EVOLUTION
All matters of physics, chemistry, and biological processes known to man, are universally subject—without exception—to the first and second laws of thermodynamics —hereafter, simply “the first law” and “the second law”.

“No matter how carefully we examine the energetics of living systems we find no evidence of defeat of thermodynamic principles.”
[Harold Blum, Time’s Arrow and Evolution (1962), p. 119.]

“The second law of thermodynamics not only is a principle of wide reaching scope and application, but also is one which has never failed to satisfy the severest test of experiment. The numerous quantitative relations derived from this law have been subjected to more and more accurate experimental investigations without the detection of the slightest inaccuracy.”
[G.N. Lewis and M. Randall, Thermodynamics (1961), p. 87.]

“There is thus no justification for the view, often glibly repeated, that the Second Law of Thermodynamics is only statistically true, in the sense that microscopic violations repeatedly occur, but never violations of any serious magnitude. On the contrary, no evidence has ever been presented that the Second Law breaks down under any circumstances.”
[A.B. Pippard, Elements of Chemical Thermodynamics for Advanced Students of Physics (1966), p. 100.]

“The universe is thus progressing toward an ultimate ‘heat death’ or, as it is technically defined, a condition of ‘maximum entropy’ . . And there is no way of avoiding this destiny. For the fateful principle known as the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which stands today as the principal pillar of classical physics left intact by the march of science, proclaims that the fundamental processes of nature are irreversible. Nature moves only one way.”
[Lincoln Barnett, The Universe and Dr. Einstein (1957), pp. 102-103.]
“...there are no known violations of the second law of thermodynamics....”
[Dr. John Ross, Harvard scientist, Chemical and Engineering News, vol. 58, July 7, 1980, p. 40]

EVOLUTIONIST THEORETICAL VIOLATION
Beginning with the “Big Bang” and the self-formation and expansion of space and matter, the evolutionist scenario declares that every structure, system, and relationship—down to every atom, molecule, and beyond—is the result of a loosely-defined, spontaneous self-assembly process of increasing organization and complexity, and a direct contradiction (i.e., theorized violation) of the second law.

[YLINGAO]

^^ Nagbukal bukal gyud sa kalagut si kebot kay nagbuhat og bag-ong thread heheheh. Problema lang ani kebot kay hagbay ra ni gidisprove ang imong gipangpost dire. hehehehe... BAHAW NA! hehehe

*creationist desperation at work*

[kebotDiNaMute]

nope! still want to contest your evo? hmmm... I waiting for satisfactory answer.. not just a blabber

[donna_belle]

^^ sir tinood man ni ang evolution. pwede ko ask imong field of study sir? i'm a medtech and nurse by profession. my dad is a biologist/doctor working for a lab in the US. i think maka explain tingali ko about evolution properly. unsa diay imong pagsabot sa evolution sir?

[kebotDiNaMute]

^^ sir tinood man ni ang evolution. pwede ko ask imong field of study sir? i'm a medtech and nurse by profession. my dad is a biologist/doctor working for a lab in the US. i think maka explain tingali ko about evolution properly. unsa diay imong pagsabot sa evolution sir?

Sis Please do explain... you can start now... how things start and how things change and how things becomes different.

Please sis, try. Ill ask question along the way... but make sure its evolution without limit. Coz i believe in big cat small cat, big dog and small dog. still cats and dog... they are variation of its kind...no conflict and proven true... we see it everywhere...

sis please try.... im waiting...

[donna_belle]

sorry sir. naa ko lakaw. naa gipangpost dire sir basics of evolution. diha lang ta magsugod asa dapit ang wa nimo mahibal-an or wa nimo masabtan. pero di kaayo nako sinati ang uban na fields sir. but i will try. i can explain my side sa genetics kay akong dad is a biologist-doctor. i learned it mostly from him ug sa labs among givisit sa US. i stopped medicine kay kapoy na kaayo kog skwela di na pod mosupport akong parents kay dako na daw ko...faetz

bless you sir.

[Malic]

1. The fossil record is false.
- These paleontologists and archaeologist use a faulty dating method. They measure the ground around the fossil or specimen because the fossil is totally contaminated by the matter around the fossil. Thus if you measure the age of the material around the fossil, you are not measuring the fossil date. You are measuring the date of the rocks, ground, dirt, sand, hardened lava and such. If you fall on the ground and die standing on a 12,000,000 year old strata, and the sand covers you and hardens to a rock, then they did up your bones 3,000 years later and they measure the age of the strata you were standing on they would say your bones are 12,000,000 years old, the same date as the strata you were standing on when you died.

2. non-adaptive mutations
- "The research not only increases our understanding of human evolution, but also suggests that many techniques used by evolutionary biologists to detect selection may be flawed," noted Uppsala's Matthew Webster.

"Describing their results in the journal PLoS Biology"

Biologists mull rapid, non-adaptive gene mutations

3. Fossils unmistakably human were discovered in strata much "older" than the alleged ape-men.

4. Ecology and interdependence between organisms cause additional problems for evolutionists.

5. The magnetic field of the earth is decaying at a measurable rate. If date back billions of years, it could have been a star..

6. THERMODYNAMICS VS EVOLUTION
All matters of physics, chemistry, and biological processes known to man, are universally subject—without exception—to the first and second laws of thermodynamics —hereafter, simply “the first law” and “the second law”.

“No matter how carefully we examine the energetics of living systems we find no evidence of defeat of thermodynamic principles.”
[Harold Blum, Time’s Arrow and Evolution (1962), p. 119.]

“The second law of thermodynamics not only is a principle of wide reaching scope and application, but also is one which has never failed to satisfy the severest test of experiment. The numerous quantitative relations derived from this law have been subjected to more and more accurate experimental investigations without the detection of the slightest inaccuracy.”
[G.N. Lewis and M. Randall, Thermodynamics (1961), p. 87.]

“There is thus no justification for the view, often glibly repeated, that the Second Law of Thermodynamics is only statistically true, in the sense that microscopic violations repeatedly occur, but never violations of any serious magnitude. On the contrary, no evidence has ever been presented that the Second Law breaks down under any circumstances.”
[A.B. Pippard, Elements of Chemical Thermodynamics for Advanced Students of Physics (1966), p. 100.]

“The universe is thus progressing toward an ultimate ‘heat death’ or, as it is technically defined, a condition of ‘maximum entropy’ . . And there is no way of avoiding this destiny. For the fateful principle known as the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which stands today as the principal pillar of classical physics left intact by the march of science, proclaims that the fundamental processes of nature are irreversible. Nature moves only one way.”
[Lincoln Barnett, The Universe and Dr. Einstein (1957), pp. 102-103.]
“...there are no known violations of the second law of thermodynamics....”
[Dr. John Ross, Harvard scientist, Chemical and Engineering News, vol. 58, July 7, 1980, p. 40]

EVOLUTIONIST THEORETICAL VIOLATION
Beginning with the “Big Bang” and the self-formation and expansion of space and matter, the evolutionist scenario declares that every structure, system, and relationship—down to every atom, molecule, and beyond—is the result of a loosely-defined, spontaneous self-assembly process of increasing organization and complexity, and a direct contradiction (i.e., theorized violation) of the second law.

sorry kebs...i can see that this is again history repeating itself. The religious community in the past centuries made a mistake by rejecting Galileo's theory.

I can see it happening again and you are falling for it eyes shut.

naa naman thread about evolution kebs...ngano buhat pa man ka og lain? haron lang jud ma front page imong inaccurate nga mga findings?

[kit_cebu]

^^failed to look at the "fault" of religion...

[bluedes]

^^ Nagbukal bukal gyud sa kalagut si kebot kay nagbuhat og bag-ong thread heheheh. Problema lang ani kebot kay hagbay ra ni gidisprove ang imong gipangpost dire. hehehehe... BAHAW NA! hehehe

*creationist desperation at work*

kayasa.. this is hilarious jud.. *desperate* move naman ni oi..

kung sa mortal kombat pa, nangurog na ang tuhod kay ang kulang na move sa evolution kay....... "FINISH HIM!"

[kebotDiNaMute]

sorry kebs...i can see that this is again history repeating itself. The religious community in the past centuries made a mistake by rejecting Galileo's theory.

I can see it happening again and you are falling for it eyes shut.

naa naman thread about evolution kebs...ngano buhat pa man ka og lain? haron lang jud ma front page imong inaccurate nga mga findings?

inacurate? so what can you say about those? hmmm...

galeleo, hmmm.

religion + politics = disaster. dont mix em brad...

give to caesar what is due to cesar give to god what is due to him...