Wikipedia on RH Bill: after reading it, what is your stand?

[salbahis]

---

dba ma edit ra ang wiki?

exactly thats why its not RELIABLE

[peewee_toot]

^^mao ng ayaw mo og tuo dayun. mas maayu nga magresearch jd...

[Xilcher]

exactly thats why its not RELIABLE

Wrong!!!

Wikipedia wont exist if its not reliable!

Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


The reliability of Wikipedia, compared to both other encyclopedias and more specialized sources, is assessed in several ways, including statistically, by comparative review, analysis of the historical patterns, and strengths and weaknesses inherent in the editing process unique to Wikipedia.

Because Wikipedia is open to anonymous and collaborative editing, assessments of its reliability usually include examinations of how quickly false or misleading information is removed. An early study conducted by IBM researchers in 2003—two years following Wikipedia's establishment—found that "vandalism is usually repaired extremely quickly — so quickly that most users will never see its effects"[1] and concluded that Wikipedia had "surprisingly effective self-healing capabilities".

Areas of reliability

The reliability of Wikipedia articles is measured by meeting the following criteria:

Accuracy of information provided within articles
Appropriateness of the images provided with the article
Appropriateness of the style and focus of the articles[10]
Susceptibility to, and exclusion and removal of, false information (a criterion specific to the Wikipedia process)
Comprehensiveness, scope and coverage within articles and in the range of articles
Identification of reputable third-party sources as citations
Stability of the articles
Susceptibility to editorial and systemic bias
Quality of writing

[AmorsoloX]

He's making more drama than needed. We're forced to do a lot of things by the government, like pay taxes, drive of the right side of the road, subject ourselves to security check at the airport. I think this guy needs to realize that we aren't free to do whatever we want. He tries to dramatize the argument by using the word FORCE because it has such a negative connotation that is not necessarily deserved, and he is deliberately using the natural reaction to the word to conjure up images of North Korean forced labor camps when discussing the RH bill. In other words, he is engaging in childish intellectual dishonesty.

yup.. that guy practices intellectual dishonesty. he even used a misleading title for the thread of the RH bill..

yup.. drama.. but as ive seen.. hes really got no substance.. if what others are saying is true.. he cant relate to this because he is not a parent himself.. he doesnt know how it is to support a child

[mimigs]

yup.. that guy practices intellectual dishonesty. he even used a misleading title for the thread of the RH bill..

yup.. drama.. but as ive seen.. hes really got no substance.. if what others are saying is true.. he cant relate to this because he is not a parent himself.. he doesnt know how it is to support a child

plus one......

[Xilcher]

^^
ok..

That guy..maybe single but not a father like someone here who
"want to kill his unborn child just to let others live"

pathetic!
criminal minded fathers!

Why would someone kill...when there are plenty of ways to eradicate poverty..!

You're answers only describe what kind of person you are..
You are born killers...subconsciously..!

Lesson:
Escape is not a solution to one's problem...Face it!
Kung nakabuntis mo sa kabiga ninyo..barugi na!!!!
or maybe.. ngita lng mo lusot para makadaghan kabit..
limpyo kaayu..walay anak sa gawas..

tsk tsk tsk...

peace!

[peewee_toot]

Wrong!!!

Wikipedia wont exist if its not reliable!

Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


The reliability of Wikipedia, compared to both other encyclopedias and more specialized sources, is assessed in several ways, including statistically, by comparative review, analysis of the historical patterns, and strengths and weaknesses inherent in the editing process unique to Wikipedia.

Because Wikipedia is open to anonymous and collaborative editing, assessments of its reliability usually include examinations of how quickly false or misleading information is removed. An early study conducted by IBM researchers in 2003—two years following Wikipedia's establishment—found that "vandalism is usually repaired extremely quickly — so quickly that most users will never see its effects"[1] and concluded that Wikipedia had "surprisingly effective self-healing capabilities".

Areas of reliability

The reliability of Wikipedia articles is measured by meeting the following criteria:

Accuracy of information provided within articles
Appropriateness of the images provided with the article
Appropriateness of the style and focus of the articles[10]
Susceptibility to, and exclusion and removal of, false information (a criterion specific to the Wikipedia process)
Comprehensiveness, scope and coverage within articles and in the range of articles
Identification of reputable third-party sources as citations
Stability of the articles
Susceptibility to editorial and systemic bias
Quality of writing

so meaning...


tanang naa sa wiki ky tinuod?@_@

[RMK711]

Di pa siguro na siya studyante sa college. He should try citing wikipedia in a college report and see how that goes

[wilhelm_conrad]

bantay bitaw ug mka pa buntis mo ha nya kamo na ang mag tago2x...

i say this, guys who say that they can control their urge when a girl is standing naked in front of him is a hypocrite...
pro rh ko not because the bill is pro abortion or anti life, it only educates people and give them a choice... I am pro Life, Anti Abortion, and I am pro RH

[RMK711]

I'm pro RH because I'm pro-RICH. As in I want my country to be rich, not poor and stupid under the control of manipulators and liars.