The Pedo's Cartographic Sketch who raped a 6 yr. old girl

[cliff_drew]

---

Witness: No tampering of Pajero's numbers

[peewee_toot]

I hope they get raped in Jail as well.

diba wala mn ma rape ang bata?

[Vince Russo]

nah, you avoided my questions. that's not a good sign.

you don't have the evidence in your hands. that's a fact. so stop bragging your supposed "experience in this field",well, this is a forum, you can be whoever you want,you can even be James bond if you want,sorry for my skepticism.

somebody is already doing it,no need for redundancy.

Nobody's bragging here. It's obvious that you have entirely missed the point of my posts. I've never said anything about having access to the evidence. I've repeatedly stated a number of things about the bumbled investigation, the over-emphasis being placed on info provided by witnesses, and the need to see the results of the DNA evidence testing. I've been critical of the handling of this case from the start. You don't have to believe anything I have said about my experience in investigations. If you don't want to benefit from that, it's okay by me. James Bond haha.. that's a good one.

By the way, how can you feel qualified to debate the topic of criminal investigation. From your experience watching CSI on tv? Do you have real experience outside of your livingroom? Please share it with us - Vince

[hunyanggo1977]

naunsa na man ni diri, ga debate man mga lawyers ug investigators... hehehe

[tokidoki]

I'm not trying to change your position. You are going to believe what you want to believe, regardless of what I say to try to enlighten you. I had 20 years of real experience in this field, and I know what I am talking about.

i find it really amusing in this forum that people eventually raise the fictional credibility card. 'im a doctor' 'im a cop' 'im a psychologist'


does that actually work in a forum? seriously? this is a forum. nobody cares. and you can't dominate this conversation just cause u have 'experience'.

thats the same reason why i dont use that excuse because to prove it i would need to expose my privacy.

are you willing to do that to prove your credibility?

[tokidoki]

naunsa na man ni diri, ga debate man mga lawyers ug investigators... hehehe

mao. dapat nakiramay man unta ta sa victim ug saway sa kabulabog sa polis

[Vince Russo]

i find it really amusing in this forum that people eventually raise the fictional credibility card. 'im a doctor' 'im a cop' 'im a psychologist'


does that actually work in a forum? seriously? this is a forum. nobody cares. and you can't dominate this conversation just cause u have 'experience'.

thats the same reason why i dont use that excuse because to prove it i would need to expose my privacy.

are you willing to do that to prove your credibility?

You spend more energy challenging me than you do analyzing this investigation. There's nothing fictional about me, tokidoki.. If you would prefer to have a private exchange, simply PM me. My credibility isn't at stake here, because as you said, nobody cares in this forum. Maybe people participating in the forum SHOULD care about credibility and experience. Let's have lunch some time and you can tell me everything you know about criminal investigation. That should take about 2 minutes... Back to the topic: Why is it taking so long to do a simple blood comparison in this case? I haven't read today's paper yet, so maybe there has been a breakthrough that I am unaware of...

[cliff_drew]

CIDG wants forensic tests on seized items

By Gerome M. Dalipe

Monday, April 18, 2011

THE police want to conduct forensic examination on six items taken from the house of Bella Ruby Santos last March 4.

Inocencio dela Cerna and Glenn Condor, counsels for the Criminal Investigation and Detection Group (CIDG) 7, filed a motion asking Judge Meinrado Paredes to allow them to conduct forensic examination on the seized items on April 25.

Police said the forensic exam is necessary to “ensure the integrity” of the evidence.

The items the police want examined are a bed sheet with suspected bloodstains, a USB flash drive and card reader, a video camera with accessories and tapes, a blanket with suspected bloodstains, a portion of a bed and mattresses with suspected bloodstains.

But due to procedures involved in forensic examinations, the police asked the court to take temporary custody of the items that have suspected bloodstains in them.

Accompanied by her lawyer Rameses Villagonzalo, Santos went to the Regional Trial Court Branch 13 yesterday morning supposedly to retrieve nine of 10 items Judge Paredes earlier ordered returned to her.

Lapsed

Lawyer Jessica Capacio, RTC 13 clerk of court, however, said the nine seized items could not be released yet to Santos until the 15-day period lapses on April 25.

The CIDG 7 seized the items believing they could resolve the kidnapping and murder of Ellah Joy Pique.

Judge Meinrado Paredes ordered that the following items be returned to Santos: the blue Pajero, hair strands, LAN cord, Nintendo game cartridge, a rug, *** toys, covers of pornographic compact disc, assorted CDs, waiver, IDs, passport and two stones.

But the CIDG 7filed a motion for partial reconsideration, asking Paredes to revisit his order returning the Pajero to Santos.

Santos, in an interview with reporters yesterday, said authorities in London froze the bank accounts of her British boyfriend, Ian Charles Griffiths, in relation to the kidnapping with homicide charge the provincial police filed against them.

Santos said they plan to burn the items taken by the CIDG from her house. She joked to reporters she intends to keep two *** toys.

Lawyer Villagonzalo said they will preserve the items and make them part of their evidence in their counter-affidavit that the criminal charge filed by the police was fabricated.

http://www.sunstar.com.ph/cebu/local...d-items-151220

[Andy99]

CIDG wants forensic tests on seized items

By Gerome M. Dalipe

Monday, April 18, 2011

THE police want to conduct forensic examination on six items taken from the house of Bella Ruby Santos last March 4.

Inocencio dela Cerna and Glenn Condor, counsels for the Criminal Investigation and Detection Group (CIDG) 7, filed a motion asking Judge Meinrado Paredes to allow them to conduct forensic examination on the seized items on April 25.

Police said the forensic exam is necessary to “ensure the integrity” of the evidence.

The items the police want examined are a bed sheet with suspected bloodstains, a USB flash drive and card reader, a video camera with accessories and tapes, a blanket with suspected bloodstains, a portion of a bed and mattresses with suspected bloodstains.

They have not examined the evidence until now??
What are they waiting for?

I thought the reason they seized the items is for doing forensic tests on them.

[tokidoki]

You spend more energy challenging me than you do analyzing this investigation. There's nothing fictional about me, tokidoki.e of...

symptom #2 of a losing conversation: passing the guilt. lol

challenging you? have you even noticed i have been ignoring your argument? the only person who's been challenging here is you bai. and don't pretend that a good number of us here can't see through your subtle attempts to dominate the thread.

let me just skip to symprom #3 of a losing conversation: name calling and character assassination. do your worst.

lastly if your credibility isn't stake here why bother brining up your so-called 'years of experience'? kabalo man diay ka wala mi paki nganu imo pa man na gisulti? simple, you were trying to tell us to shut the hell up coz u know more about this than we do. sadly im not buying it.