Is Evolutionist Science worth believing?

[SPIKE_CSA]

---

LOL sa wikipedia na nimo gihuka, and ang title sa article kay "Theory of Relativity" hahaha bistado

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_relativity

Now tell me--is there a statement in that article that says dili na intawon theory ang relativity karon!?? If so, bow ko sa imo

hihihi Shakes head hihi nalingaw jo kaayo bay, sige make my day and keep posting I just love how people build up what they deem to be a "sense of credibility" in these boards--fascinating indeed.

-RODION

hahahaha so what? Theories in science are different from facts. difference gani dili gyud na pareha. now matawag ba gud na nimo ug facts ang theory of evolution? hahahahaha kalooy sad tawn nimo rodsky..

now prove to me that humans beings came from ape. hahaha the burden of proof is in you dude

[tripwire]

no i mean sa evolution from apes to humans... what is scientific is LIKE BEGETS LIKE.. frog begets frog, fish begets fish, apes begets apes and humans begets humans..

ug dili sad ko mosugot nga gikan ko sa onggoy oi hehe and of course ikaw sad siguro mam.. ka cute nimo nya gikan lng ka sa onggoy? hehe i dont think so

sir, I think there is a misconception on your part. If you honestly read some books about evolution... we have a common ancestor. As I presented on single cell organisms... but I leave you at that issue at least there is something to read about, corect?

[rodsky]

hahahaha so what? Theories in science are different from facts. difference gani dili gyud na pareha. now matawag ba gud na nimo ug facts ang theory of evolution? hahahahaha kalooy sad tawn nimo rodsky..

now prove to me that humans beings came from ape. hahaha the burden of proof is in you dude

I don't have to prove to you anything. I believe in what I believe and you believe what you want to believe. And thanks for being makaloloy-on It doesn't change the fact that you are simply not equipped to understand the facts which leads to your misunderstanding, misinterpretation and unacceptance of the ideas.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evoluti...heory_and_fact

The table on the theory of gravity and theory of evolution is very nice in a side-by-side comparison of this Again if you don't understand this, it's your problem not mine--everything is crystal clear in my brain, but don't expect me to explain it to you, capish?

sir, I think there is a misconception on your part. If you honestly read some books about evolution... we have a common ancestor. As I presented on single cell organisms... but I leave you at that issue at least there is something to read about, corect?

Pasagdi na nya cya trip, naglisod man gud na cya ipicture nga someone as pretty as you comes from an ape--that's his only concern lol

-RODION

[tripwire]

why call theory if tinood man galing? hahaha you have a big problem dude.,.

Here's a good way to explain why you thought that "theory" is nothing but a theory.

"Presumably we think that the word "theory" means about the same thing as a "pipe dream." But the term theory, at least as it applies to experimental science, has a much nobler meaning than that. A scientific theory is a careful attempt to explain certain observable facts of nature by means of experiments. Science itself is the whole process of making careful observations of certain facts of nature and then constructing and testing theories that seek to explain those facts. We call these tests of a theory experiments. Experimental science, better known as empirical science, is the kind of science that is responsible for the marvelous technological achievements that make our life easier. One has only to consider what it would be like to endure surgery without anesthesia to appreciate the contributions of empirical science to our life.

What then shall we say of evolution? First, evolutionists tell us that major evolutionary changes happen far too slowly, or too rarely, to be observable in the lifetime of human observers. Most living organisms and their offspring are said to remain largely unchanged for tens of thousands, or even millions, of years. According to the evolutionist Theodosius Dobzhansky, even when evolutionary changes do occur, they are by nature "unique, unrepeatable, and irreversible." Dobzhansky tells us that the "applicability of the experimental method to the study of such unique historical processes is severely restricted." The well-known evolutionist Paul Ehrlich says the theory of evolution "cannot be refuted by any possible observations" and thus is "outside of empirical science."

Still, the occurrence of evolution is widely believed to be a scientific "fact" and those who dare to doubt it are not endured gladly. The Encyclopedia Britannica confidently assures us that "we are not in the least doubt as to the fact of evolution." In his textbook _Evolution_, J. Savage says "we do not need a listing of the evidences to demonstrate the fact of evolution any more than we need to demonstrate the existence of mountain ranges."

By Dr. David N. Menton, Ph.D.

[SPIKE_CSA]

I don't have to prove to you anything. I believe in what I believe and you believe what you want to believe. And thanks for being makaloloy-on It doesn't change the fact that you are simply not equipped to understand the facts which leads to your misunderstanding, misinterpretation and unacceptance of the ideas.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evoluti...heory_and_fact

The table on the theory of gravity and theory of evolution is very nice in a side-by-side comparison of this Again if you don't understand this, it's your problem not mine--everything is crystal clear in my brain, but don't expect me to explain it to you, capish?

Pasagdi na nya cya trip, naglisod man gud na cya ipicture nga someone as pretty as you comes from an ape--that's his only concern lol

-RODION

hahaha it your choice man.. you believe on something that cannot be proven hahaha year 2008 nalng pero ang theory of evolution is not scientific lng gihapon. you have to remember that LIKE BEGETS LIKE. Mao na ang scientific hahahaha

[rodsky]

hahaha it your choice man.. you believe on something that cannot be proven hahaha year 2008 nalng pero ang theory of evolution is not scientific lng gihapon. you have to remember that LIKE BEGETS LIKE. Mao na ang scientific hahahaha

Bay, kung wala ka nakakita sa usa ka movie, will you tell your friend nga bati ang movie just because someone else said nga bati ang movie?

And to go further... what if you decided to watch the said movie, pero wala ka kasabot sa movie...will you then claim and say to your friend "Bay, batiii kaayo ang movie kay wala ko kasabot when I saw it. So akong advice, ayaw pag-tan-aw sa movie kay bati man para nako." Hmmm?

-RODION

[SPIKE_CSA]

Bay, kung wala ka nakakita sa usa ka movie, will you tell your friend nga bati ang movie just because someone else said nga bati ang movie?

And to go further... what if you decided to watch the said movie, pero wala ka kasabot sa movie...will you then claim and say to your friend "Bay, batiii kaayo ang movie kay wala ko kasabot when I saw it. So akong advice, ayaw pag-tan-aw sa movie kay bati man para nako." Hmmm?

-RODION

hahaha kuyawa gud nimo ug analogy.. aw kay nangutana man ka tubagon taka.. of course dili ko moingon nga nindot or bati ang usa ka movie ug wala ko nakakita..

unya dili sad ko moingon nga bati or nindot ang movie kon wala ko kasabot intawn oi.. basin ikaw siguro rodsky hahaha

tan-awa lng gud na ang bata nga motan-aw ug movie maski wala kasabot nganong maka ingon man sila nga nindot ang movie? hahaha pastilan nimo rodsky hahaha

[rodsky]

hahaha kuyawa gud nimo ug analogy.. aw kay nangutana man ka tubagon taka.. of course dili ko moingon nga nindot or bati ang usa ka movie ug wala ko nakakita..

unya dili sad ko moingon nga bati or nindot ang movie kon wala ko kasabot intawn oi.. basin ikaw siguro rodsky hahaha

tan-awa lng gud na ang bata nga motan-aw ug movie maski wala kasabot nganong maka ingon man sila nga nindot ang movie? hahaha pastilan nimo rodsky hahaha

Aws then nganong mag-claim man ka nga dili scientific ang theory of evolution? Do you even understand what science or the scientific method is? Klaro kaayo nga the reason why you cannot accept it is you don't understand it. Period. Parehas ra ka sa wala kakita sa movie and then mag judge dayon.

Sige, paggamit ug mga words like pastilan bay. It shows your tendency towards profanity rather than clear-headed and concise discussion.

-RODION

[SPIKE_CSA]

Aws then nganong mag-claim man ka nga dili scientific ang theory of evolution? Do you even understand what science or the scientific method is? Klaro kaayo nga the reason why you cannot accept it is you don't understand it. Period. Parehas ra ka sa wala kakita sa movie and then mag judge dayon.

-RODION

hahaha wa gyud ka kasabot diay part. the main reason nga wala ko motoo sa theory of evolution kay dili man gyud na tinood. naa ba gud na ebidensya nga tinood na? e prove kuno diri tan-awon kuno nato..

[rodsky]

hahaha wa gyud ka kasabot diay part. the main reason nga wala ko motoo sa theory of evolution kay dili man gyud na tinood. naa ba gud na ebidensya nga tinood na? e prove kuno diri tan-awon kuno nato..

Let's get a good example--wala man ko evidence beh nga tinood ka nga tawo...di ba?

Ako I can at least present evidence that I exist...ngalan nako kay Rodion M. Herrera, ma google nimo ko sa internet, naay photos around the 'net that show I exist, therefore in your analysis, kay naay ebidensya, I do exist. Some may not believe the evidence, but it can be used as evidence to prove that a person named Rodion M. Herrera exists in this world.

Now, using that as basis, nag check man ko ug SPIKE_CSA sa internet...tsk tsk tsk...pag-check lagi nako, murag wala man ko kakita ug ebidensya that you exist! Wow! Therefore kuyawan ko kaayo, I'm therefore talking to someone that doesn't exist! So ngano man ni? hihihihi Pero see? I do believe that you do exist, even though wala ko'y sakto nga proof that you exist! I base my beliefs on your posts here--I believe that you exist because of your posts--your posts may not be evidence, but I can still use them to argue that you do indeed exist...similarly, I cannot give you examples or evidence that the theory of Evolution's explanations is false, but I understand the principles on why it works, and why I believe in it. Now that is an example of being logical and leads to being scientific.

See? Absence of evidence, does not mean evidence of absence.

-RODION