if i may add, the opposition during Erap's time was not as hungry for power as the current opposition we have.Originally Posted by booc1025
still, ERAP administration sucks!!!![]()
if i may add, the opposition during Erap's time was not as hungry for power as the current opposition we have.Originally Posted by booc1025
still, ERAP administration sucks!!!![]()
it's not PGMA who sucks...but the politicians who are still vying for her throne as the president...until now they are still hoping to steal the position from her...people should not compare estrada to gma...they are not in the same level...gma is way too intelligent and got more sense than erap...
apparently, what drive the senate and even people from congress including president's allies is that the prohibition of executive officials from appearing before any legislative investigation without her permission must have fairly enough vertebrae from the current provision of our constitution.. implying a direct slap on the congress, which is so impolitic for a president..Originally Posted by estor_boot
constitutional reliance of such order was more likely basing on provisions which, i dunno if her advisers are aware at, have been slightly modified..
old provision.. purely dependent upon the president’s consent:
“The heads of departments upon their own initiative or upon the request of either House may appear before and be heard by such House on any matter pertaining to their departments unless the public interest shall require otherwise and the President shall so state in writing.”Â*
current provision:
"The heads of departments may upon their own initiative, with the consent of the President, or upon the request of either House, as the rules of each House shall provide, appear before and be heard by such House on any matter pertaining to their departments.”
the stressing of “or” reflects two scenarios when the department heads may appear before legislative inquiries.. when they do so upon their own initiative with the permission of the president as a prerequisite... while another scenario is when their appearance is requested by the house of congress,Â* notwithstanding any express consent from the president.. i think a modification in the charter was intended to reduce the executive powers that marcos abused before..
commonsense suggests that by instinct we are compelled to cover our assess in any way we can.. and giving somebody who’s involved in the issue a direct or indirect influence on the development or outcome of it.. then expect biased to play a role on it..Originally Posted by darkwing
seems like as for the president she is very willing to do so.. even if she would have the nerve alienate congress and the public’s right as well - by meddling with the functions and powers of a co-equal branch of the government and smothering freedom of expression and the right to information of the people in general.. ()
indeed! especially nobody’s willing to compromise..lets just wait what is the decision of the supreme court!!!!
but it's just a investigation... and the witnesses, accused or whoever is called in the senate still has the right to bring an atty. I believe, the lawyer of Sandra Cam was even cited for contempt in the senate. Yeah attacking the person personally is wrong but should it be stopped bec. only one person compared the person as a pimp. Should this be a mere basis to disallow person to participate in hearings...@FK: yeah, transparency is always good, but look at how the senators cross examine the supposed to be accused and witnesses, is it right to attack people personally by saying that they are pimps and are not fitted for the position they're holding. their lawyers couldn't even object. it's all wrong, this hearings should be done in court. have you ever been in any court hearings FK? in a real court, the accused eventhough its clear to everybody that he's guilty, is given right to defend himself legally and must be given utmost respect until proven guilty. the senate hearings are like guerilla hearings, they attack a person with statements irrelevant to the topic. if you were in their shoes you'd feel uncomfortable and deprived of your basic right as a person.
Si Zuce man sab gani bai gitawag lang to bisan onsa... naa bai ni reklamo nga bastos kaau ang naa sa senate?
Pareho diri sa istorya, naay uban manawag na og bisan onsa sa usa ka taw, Last time I remember somebody called me a fag... Does this make istorya bad?
You now cannot talk without the approval of the President. = Dictatorship.
It is a crime to talk anything against the President. = Martial Law.
What is the Job Description of the Philippine President? Approves bill from Senate/Congress and Photo ops.
E0 464 is not good for the Philippines. It is an insult to the intelligence of a Democratic Society. EO 464 tramples your right to speak freely.
that gag order is only bound to GMA's subordinates..instigating that as a precursor to dictatorship/martial law is too implausible..
What is the purpose of Malacanang PRO "Bunye"?
EO 464 has officially extended "Bunye" function to include all Departmental Branches under his control.
EO 464 is a fact Dictatorship.
as i said the scope of the executive order is only bounded to GMA's cabinet, the PUBLIC is not in any way affected by it...
people are getting beaten on the streets!!!!
bawal ang rally w/o permit!!!
ul b put in detention cells if u talk bad about the president!!!!
what the f#$% is going on?!?!?!
last night i saw abusive cops beating anyone who's against the president... if you dont see this as martial law, i dont know what will!
erap is a whole lot better, at least he got his "trust fund" from jueteng...
not unlike gma where she stole money from the people to run her presidency!!!
I EXPECT SOMEONE WOULD BE KNOCKING AT MY DOOR TONIGHT TO TAKE ME TO CUSTODY!!!
What happened to the Superintendent and Deputy of the PMA? Â*Court Martialled. = Martial Law and Dictatorship.
Cabinet? No. It applies to all.
I moshi moshi declare moshi order 666 to gag anyone who does not agree with me. What I say shall be the only truth and must be followed in any way or form. Whoever disagree with me shall be arrested and jailed till I say otherwise.
Similar Threads |
|