Poverty

[<SMILE>]

---

Thats what i thought about multi tasking.... but i just dont see any logic with Smile's post to have it abolished and illegalized...

Instead of employing five they will only have one for the payroll.
rendering no job for the other four.

[emow]

Instead of employing five they will only have one for the payroll.
rendering no job for the other four.

Gotcha... well, to be able to enforce your suggestion, you must infringe civil liberties. And for argument's sake, how would anyone know that five employees are needed instead of one? If the business made an error of judgement of employing just one employee for which tasks pile up on top of one another, then the business will suffer due to the overburdened employee, a loss of profit is a cardinal sin. The business will ultimately balance the work needed to be efficiently done versus the cost of additional employees performing the work.

[<SMILE>]

Gotcha... well, to be able to enforce your suggestion, you must infringe civil liberties. And for argument's sake, how would anyone know that five employees are needed instead of one? If the business made an error of judgement of employing just one employee for which tasks pile up on top of one another, then the business will suffer due to the overburdened employee, a loss of profit is a cardinal sin. The business will ultimately balance the work needed to be efficiently done versus the cost of additional employees performing the work.

and you are now implying that libertarians did cause rampant unemployment.
then why giving five different jobs to an individual when it is supposedly should be delegated to five persons,
is'nt that an abusive act, for the sake of profit lessening the labor cost.
Your libertarian views would create big disparity between the rich and the poor restricting the rights
of the poor and giving more freedom towards the rich.
How dumb these libertarians are.

[emow]

and you are now implying that libertarians did cause rampant unemployment.
then why giving five different jobs to an individual when it is supposedly should be delegated to five persons,
is'nt that an abusive act, for the sake of profit lessening the labor cost.
Your libertarian views would create big disparity between the rich and the poor restricting the rights
of the poor and giving more freedom towards the rich.
How dumb these libertarians are.

Wooow, hold your horses smile, just back up a little bit, and try to understand the post. It wasn't an attack against you, and you resorted to discrimination... use your reason, not your ego. Since you are not so keen on comprehension and insists in trying to discuss such topics, let me simplify it for you so that you would be able to expound your thoughts: ( mura kag irong buang pstakag pamahit, chill lang bai, maobvious nya asa ra ka kutub.)

1. how can government illegalize multi tasking on all industries? Like a sample scenario on its implementation.
2. How does that affect the pay of each employee?
3. What are the parameters for employers to follow to avoid commiting multi tasking against their employees?
4. Is multi tasking a great contributor to unemployment? Or is it just an effect of other causes?
5. Consider yourself as an employer, what are the factors you consider before hiring an employee?

If you take time to discuss, then answer these questions. If not, vontinue with your ad hominems.

[H.Wolowitz]

haha kalingaw ba diri.

but i know one thing for sure, if only our government supported our inventors and leveled the playing field for all business-minded people, then this poverty or economic status that you are talking about would have been greatly improved!

[<SMILE>]

Wooow, hold your horses smile, just back up a little bit, and try to understand the post. It wasn't an attack against you, and you resorted to discrimination... use your reason, not your ego. Since you are not so keen on comprehension and insists in trying to discuss such topics, let me simplify it for you so that you would be able to expound your thoughts: ( mura kag irong buang pstakag pamahit, chill lang bai, maobvious nya asa ra ka kutub.)

1. how can government illegalize multi tasking on all industries? Like a sample scenario on its implementation.
2. How does that affect the pay of each employee?
3. What are the parameters for employers to follow to avoid commiting multi tasking against their employees?
4. Is multi tasking a great contributor to unemployment? Or is it just an effect of other causes?
5. Consider yourself as an employer, what are the factors you consider before hiring an employee?

If you take time to discuss, then answer these questions. If not, vontinue with your ad hominems.

Who's attacking who?
Ka-cool ra nako, ikaw ra man gani pataka ug pamahit,
nag-hilom2x ra kos daplin, imo man tengaleng ego ang natandog.

Okay enough for that nonsense and somehow silly and idiotic thing you are pushing through

Give the new graduates and the unemployed a chance to work,
do not delegate overload a single employee with so many jobs just to cut corners,
it's not even healthy performance wise.

I wish to know a libtards workers view about this issue,
could you contribute?

[masakiton]

good quality of education is they key to sucess

[KE-25]

Notice:

Relax lang when discussing topics. A big part nganong mo init ang sturya kay people don't watch what they say. Ok ra ang debates pero lets not use words like " irong buang " or " How dumb a type of person can be " etc.

On topic , I think education helps in a very big way. I have seen certain individuals break away from the norm of poverty through personal responsibility. There was this story over ABS or GMA , forgot the network but I liked this individual who sold stuff in the streets , then became a taxi driver and finally Lawyer. He used what he saved to go to Law school, most days he is working Pro Bono for the less fortunate among other things.

While Poverty is still a big problem in this country , my hope is people will realize that no one will miraculously pick you up and place you in a better place but it is oneself that will find a way "legally" to better themselves.
It is through hard work , patience and understanding that one may break away from the Norm. The Norm of well pobre man ta , matug nalang sa ta , or inom ta na , or mahjong sa ko or paita sa goberno , or murag nindot ning lugar e himo ug payag , so on .... hinaot unta maninguha ta para mo maayo atong kinabuhi.

Which brings us to the question , " Paita , na tao ta aning pobre ta " , ani nalang gyud ta " , well tinood lisod ang situation , pero I remember gi sulti ni Papa , we are given hands , eyes , legs , brain etc .... ato kuno ni gamiton sa pag alsa aning lisod na kinabuhi.

And I think the original post question should be asked correctly , we all know situations of poverty (well for most) , poverty , one can wiki it ... the state of being extremely poor. Penury, destitution, pauperism, pauperdom, beggary, indigence, pennilessness, impoverishment, neediness, need, hardship, impecuniousness.

That's my 2 cents

This post will be monitored

[SioDenz]

Problem of Poverty cannot and will Not be solved because the distribution of wealth in this world is Not balance...

[KE-25]

Problem of Poverty cannot and will Not be solved because the distribution of wealth in this world is Not balance...

I think instead of saying distribution is skewed , would it be safe to say , lets start changing that. I know I know , we are but a few that could change a somewhat impossible task. But in our country who put them there? and can't we find ways to change it.