
Originally Posted by
simoncpu
Kung naa pud ka sa tarong nga pang-huna2x or tarong ka nga tao, would you really use this line of reasoning in
Istorya.net? sure oi

ako question nimo is this. the issue on hand where natagak ang bata sa SM, did this really happen? or is this just a simple theoritical arguement?
if this is the latter, then i would expect silly replies from people who find gratification in oral arguements.
i, on the other hand, am talking about what's real, not some silly line of reasoning or following this logic or some other similar rubbish.
so in essence, you're telling everyone that kani mga posts sa istorya.net kay bugal2x ra tanan? that tanan arguements theoritical lang & things really didin't happen?
sure oi

Originally Posted by
Sarevok
kung wala nabuak ang glass wa unta nahulog ang bata

kung wala pa nagdagandagan ang bata wala unta nabuak ang glass

kung gibadlong sa inahan ang bata wa unta nagdagandagan ang bata
/root cause analysis

panganak sa, niya badlonga dayon ang bata nga nagkiat. pugngi kuno ang bata magkiat. tanawn nato.