Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 54
  1. #21
    C.I.A. Premium Member jordinho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    1,560

    Default Re: Core2duo 3.0 and Core2Quad 2.4


    30-40% is just a conservative estimate, i wouldnt be surprised if it was 50-70% faster when encoding/decoding stuff

  2. #22

    Default Re: Core2duo 3.0 and Core2Quad 2.4

    Quote Originally Posted by jordinho
    30-40% is just a conservative estimate, i wouldnt be surprised if it was 50-70% faster when encoding/decoding stuff
    even if its 85% faster, i would not consider it multicore efficient.

    98% increase is what i would call effcient, but i think thats close to impossible on how the current intel quadcores are made

    still im happy i bought the Q6600 even tho i barely use more than 1 core..

  3. #23
    C.I.A. Premium Member jordinho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    1,560

    Default Re: Core2duo 3.0 and Core2Quad 2.4

    OT mods

    errrrr sure sure lol

  4. #24

    Default Re: Core2duo 3.0 and Core2Quad 2.4

    Quote Originally Posted by jordinho
    OT mods

    errrrr sure sure lol

  5. #25

    Default Re: Core2duo 3.0 and Core2Quad 2.4

    Quote Originally Posted by EarlZ
    and your reply was

    So your telling him to grab the more expensive processor for office work ?

    since he posted about asking why the 3.0Ghz C2D ( E6850 ) is more expensive as compared to the 2.4Ghz C2Q ( Q6600 )
    even if quads are expensive for office work alone but given both processors as a choice the quad wins in both price and performance.
    oh..i thought C2D is more cheaper than C2Q..

  6. #26

    Default Re: Core2duo 3.0 and Core2Quad 2.4

    Quote Originally Posted by digitalsuperman
    depends on the purpose... but if its only for Word, Excel or any other office applications, Core2Duo will suffice.
    Uhmmm... Is'nt that a bit of OVERKILL?

    I thought I Celeron D or P4 in LGA775 would more than suffice for such tasks.

    Quote Originally Posted by EarlZ
    Im not sure if i can recall the exact numbers but the hottest P4 is rated at 195watts TPD where as the hottest C2Q is 105W ?
    That's about right.

    But, IIRC it wa the Prescott and EE versions of the P4, which ran very hot. The earlier Northwoods were much more cooler than the two later types. I actually had a 2.8 Prescott and on idle it was like 55 C.

  7. #27

    Default Re: Core2duo 3.0 and Core2Quad 2.4

    Quote Originally Posted by digitalsuperman
    oh..i thought C2D is more cheaper than C2Q..

    NP

  8. #28

    Default Re: Core2duo 3.0 and Core2Quad 2.4

    how about the c2d life span...... when ni cya probably ma obsolete? basin after next 2 years ma obsolete na ang c2d and Quad

    T_T im tihik man gud....

  9. #29

    Default Re: Core2duo 3.0 and Core2Quad 2.4

    usa ra ako kasulti ani;
    best example for this one is: "two brains are better than one"

  10. #30

    Default Re: Core2duo 3.0 and Core2Quad 2.4

    Quote Originally Posted by dartzed
    usa ra ako kasulti ani;
    best example for this one is: "two brain is better than one"
    Not necessarily.
    But im sure two brains are more than one.

  11.    Advertisement

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

 
  1. Looking For: core2duo proc/PSU and HSF
    By miklot in forum Computers & Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-28-2012, 07:17 PM
  2. For Sale: Computer Parts (core2duo,mobo,casing and etc..)
    By lamoks in forum Computers & Accessories
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 05-08-2009, 09:21 PM
  3. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 11-16-2007, 06:20 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
about us
We are the first Cebu Online Media.

iSTORYA.NET is Cebu's Biggest, Southern Philippines' Most Active, and the Philippines' Strongest Online Community!
follow us
#top