Erap's Trial: For President Again this 2010?

[SamuraiArcher]

---

Let's wait and see what will be the final decision......................

[magma]

Mga bro. og ma-convicted man galing ni si Erap, di gihapon diay ni siya ma priso or og ma-priso man galing ni magdugay kay naa na man memo si GMA nga tagaan og pardon ang piniriso nga 70 years old and above. Si Erap 69 na hapit unya gilangay-langay pa gyud ang kaso. So possible maabtan pa ni og 70 years old na ni ss Erap usa pa makahatag of decision ang korte.

Here's the news link:
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/storypage.aspx?StoryID=33920

Wa pa honoon mapirmahi ni GMA ang memo pero adto gihapon ni padulong...

[FK]

ang kahadlok sa uban nga si ESTRADA maka gawas sa prisohan kong mapili ang taga opposition possibly mahitabo kang GMA ra mismo. toinks!

[bcasabee]

hahahahahaha

Mga bro. og ma-convicted man galing ni si Erap, di gihapon diay ni siya ma priso or og ma-priso man galing ni magdugay kay naa na man memo si GMA nga tagaan og pardon ang piniriso nga 70 years old and above. Si Erap 69 na hapit unya gilangay-langay pa gyud ang kaso. So possible maabtan pa ni og 70 years old na ni ss Erap usa pa makahatag of decision ang korte.

Here's the news link:
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/storypage.aspx?StoryID=33920

Wa pa honoon mapirmahi ni GMA ang memo pero adto gihapon ni padulong...

[pandisal]

NO.... before his 70th birthday... ma firing squad naman siya....

[marke]

Prosecutor fails to impeach Erap testimony

Villa-Ignacio overruled 12 times for failure to ask right questions


Focusing on the charges of perjury for his first cross-examination of detained President Joseph Estrada, chief Special Prosecutor Dennis Villa-Ignacio gave a dismal performance and failed miserably in impeaching the testimony of the deposed leader and berated by the court for not being prepared for his cross- examination.

He was moreover reprimanded by the Sandiganbayan special division justices for asking irrelevant and immaterial questions, sustaining the defense counsels objections at least 17 times and overruling questions propounded by Villa-Ignacio at least 10 times.

[marke]

Prosecution stymied on first day
of cross-examination of Erap

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



BY PETER J.G. TABINGO

THE first day of cross-examination on President Joseph Estrada yesterday proved to be frustrating to the prosecution as the Sandiganbayan Special Division repeatedly admonished it for posing questions immaterial to his perjury case.

The graft court sustained the objections of the defense panel at least 10 times, citing the failure of the prosecution to give the basis for its questions.

Special Prosecutor Dennis Villa-Ignacio was reprimanded twice for posing questions which were irrelevant to the information filed on the case.

The first was a question on the supposed undeclared assets of Estrada’s minor children. The other was on which "wife" Estrada was referring to in his 1998 statement of assets, liabilities and net worth (SALN).

Associate Justice Diosdado Peralta called the prosecution’s attention to the fact that only a list of Estrada’s alleged companies and three bank accounts was mentioned in the perjury information.

"You have to ask questions only on issues alleged in the information. Anything beyond that is immaterial and irrelevant," Peralta told Villa-Ignacio.

Presiding Justice Teresita Leonardo-De Castro added, "You are going way beyond the information, Mr. Prosecutor."

Villa-Ignacio opened his cross-examination by attacking Estrada’s testimony on his alleged misrepresentations in his 1998 SALN.

Government lawyers claim Estrada concealed money in bank accounts and investments in several companies that were not declared in his SALN.

Villa-Ignacio asked Estrada why only P1.9 million was declared as his "cash on hand and in banks" when there were three bank accounts in his name containing total deposits of P56.79 million.

Estrada replied that only the P500,000 in Asia United Bank was his, while the P12.29 million in Security Bank and P44 million in Keppel Bank were contributions to the campaign fund of his political party Partido ng Masang Pilipino.

"Why would I indicate it in my SALN? The money wasn’t mine. They were deposited in my name only because I was the titular head of the PMP. I was holding it in trust. Those (funds) were political contributions and they belong to the party. All the members know that," Estrada said.

Estrada said he has no idea if the campaign funds were fully disclosed to the Commission on Elections as required by law.

"That is not my job. It’s the job of the party treasurer," he said.

[marke]

These plunder case will unravel who is telling the truth. Who is the victim and who is really the villain.

If Erap is exonerated I think the flak first and foremost would be heaped on Chavit Singson.

[kamikaze426]

i dont know if OT bani pero It is related to the plunder case.
Ngano karon pa man ni angkon si Erap nga cya si Jose Vellarde, is it because karon pa nakahimo ug good story ang kampo ni erap?
if I remember correctly pirti niyang deny nga cya c jose Velarde.. why all of a sudden?

[iloveyou4ever]

i dont know if OT bani pero It is related to the plunder case.
Ngano karon pa man ni angkon si Erap nga cya si Jose Vellarde, is it because karon pa nakahimo ug good story ang kampo ni erap?
if I remember correctly pirti niyang deny nga cya c jose Velarde.. why all of a sudden?

sakto!