
Originally Posted by
Zerone_null
I went for AMD cos i wanted to learn the ways of OC masters Crashburn and BeoR.

ngek! the force is strong in you young padawan... hehehe

Originally Posted by
LytSlpr
PRICE: is no object if you are in pursuit of quality & performace. nothing nice comes cheap. as they say, price is the only guarantee for quality.
I beg to disagree... there are a lot of cheap stuff out there that outmatch their more expensive counterparts...
PERFORMANCE: is a combination of stability & speed which obviously AMD doesn't have. stability is far more important than speed, for me at least & benchmarks are mum on stability. That is why it has to be Performance Rating over Clock Speed.
Obviously you never had a hands on experience on both systems... AMD is as stable as Intel... the same way Intel can be as unstable as AMD...
HEAT MANAGEMENT: all PC/electronic experts unanimously agree that heat management is everything in this ballgame. Speed is absolutely nothing without Control as the Porsche saying goes.
As I have stated on some other post, the only reason why Intel seems cooler than an AMD processor is its Thermal Throttling and HUGE HSF... disable it and you'll see that it is as hot or hotter than a comparable AMD processor...
Low Price & High Performance? It doesn't add up. That's why there are Corollas & Camrys or Sentras & Infinitis.
in fact it does... a 25k Athlon System can perform at par or even outperform a 35k P4 system...
It is a fact that majority mainframes & servers across the globe undeniably still banks on Intel for performance & stability maybe not on speed but that's negligible because it is the former features that counts most.
mainframes don't use Intel Processors while some Server do... but it is a myth that most mission critical servers run on Intel Processors... maybe you mean workgroup servers...
Why do you think AMD is agressively marketing their processors on the stand-alone or SoHo level & not on the big game? It's because large company consumers spend separately on research & development in every aspect of the hardware they are going to humongously invest on and obviously Intel is still the processor of choice for these big players.
PEACE!!!
because they know that their current systems cannot compete at that market yet... why spend on a market that you cannot get into yet? wait for the Opteron.. let's see what Intel will offer to beat it...

Originally Posted by
LytSlpr

Originally Posted by
alvinladen
Overclocking your proc. doesnt really give the real performance of that cpu (ex. 1.8ghz OC to 2.4ghz) am i right?
you're right!
it does... and surpasses it depending on how you overclock your system...
PEACE!!! :mrgreen: