Intel Core i7-3770 and 8gbx2 G.Skill Ripjaws X 1866Mhz or higher RAM?

[keropi]

---

false?? linus and Nicolas tested it...they are youtube techie guys in case you don't know...
it was even 800mhz vs 2400 mhz...no difference in gaming using gtx 660ti..they tested far cry 3,tomb raider,bf3 8x/4xmsaa 1080p..no difference in fps...

the ddr3 ram is used for loading game data so no need for 2400mhz ram except for apu
ddr5 vram is used for storing/rendering graphics data(pixels/textures) so even 800MHz ram is enough since you won't use it for graphics anyways..
do some research son..

Linus and Nicolas who? Theyre not an Anand Shimpi nor a Chris Angelini nor a Hilbert Hagedoorn. Correspondingly, anybody who listens to them are no different from noobs...

[bitag]

1333mhz & 2400mhz

1333 < 2400 true
1333 = 2400 false

therefore, there's a SLIGHT difference between the two....

[potpolima]

1333mhz & 2400mhz

1333 < 2400 true
1333 = 2400 false

therefore, there's a SLIGHT difference between the two....

1333=2400 true in gaming...proven and tested on gtx 660ti because the ddr5 vram is used in storing graphics data not the 1333 ram...2400 will affect loading time but not fps..do some research too son

- - - Updated - - -

Linus and Nicolas who? Theyre not an Anand Shimpi nor a Chris Angelini nor a Hilbert Hagedoorn. Correspondingly, anybody who listens to them are no different from noobs...

Chris Angelini whos that?? a magican?
Hilbert Hagedoorn?? sounds like fpj movie

[tabs14]

hahahahha nindot sad naay mag supak2x nga ang gbasihan BALITANG BISDAK ra........

[e_mer8]

Popcorn plz. Keep the info coming...

[keropi]

1333=2400 true in gaming...proven and tested on gtx 660ti because the ddr5 vram is used in storing graphics data not the 1333 ram...2400 will affect loading time but not fps..do some research too son

- - - Updated - - -



Chris Angelini whos that?? a magican?
Hilbert Hagedoorn?? sounds like fpj movie

Hahaha.. Classic row 4 answer..

[wylliexhan]

I think the reason why developers developed higher RAM Frequencies because technologies really run so fast, they are good for overclockers. I agree with bitag 1333 < 2400, there is really much difference in performance. If 1333 = 2400, why do such developers developed higher than 1333 if they do have the same performance? I think this idea will enlighten us why there are higher frequency RAMS. They do have a purpose for that.

[potpolima]

I think the reason why developers developed higher RAM Frequencies because technologies really run so fast, they are good for overclockers. I agree with bitag 1333 < 2400, there is really much difference in performance. If 1333 = 2400, why do such developers developed higher than 1333 if they do have the same performance? I think this idea will enlighten us why there are higher frequency RAMS. They do have a purpose for that.

I clearly said 1333 performs similar to 2400 in GAMING...2400 is for intensive applications and is overkill for GAMING..
I don't know about 4k resolutions but at 1080p,1333 is more than enough...

[lloyd_joy]

in gaming, yes, there is a slight difference but negligible... from 1600 MHz and above mem speed... but there is a significant improvement from 1333 MHz when we'll jump to 1600 MHz with regards to gaming fps...

let me share the synthetic result of my benchmark... had OC'ed the 4 x 4 GB (16 GB) Kingston HyperX Beast from its stock speed of 1600 MHz... to 1866 Mhz then to 2133 MHz... there is a significant improvement on the mem modules performance on read, write, copy & latency... for sure, games will not have a significant benefit from these mem performance improvement but, im pretty sure, memory intensive applications will do benefit from it...

original speed @ 1600 MHz...




OC'ed to 1866 Mhz...




OC'ed to 2133 Mhz...

[wylliexhan]

Thanks lloyd_joy this explains me a lot. I can now see the difference in FPS running your Memory in higher Frequency.
@potpolima. Good Luck to you!