How can the conscience supply the policy when whatever is encountered provides the judgement already without the very POLICY you are talking about ?
To clarify for you sake; the policy im referring to is "rule enforcement" ei, as a police so policy, sorry for using the inappropriate term.
The Idea: The conscience "enforces" the knowledge we know related to what is bad or good, because we as humans has wants that is deemed bad/evil based on what we know morally.
Whatever you may encounter, your conscience will not directly say it is good or bad for you cannot, as a conscious being, co relate to the idea/thing/event you have witness, if it is bad or not.
If you are completely unaware that killing other people is totally bad, you will not bother seeing some strangle another someone to death.
It could be dependent in a very indirect way but it will never over rule the conscience . KNowledge is man made while conscience is nature that came with us .
No, knowledge is not man-made. Since when did man created knowledge? Knowledge is a consciousness of things/ideas. Man did not created it, it existed along with everything we know, be it a God or a rock.
Since when was throwing Holy Water a VIOLATION ? Its just a matter of respecting it . Again ... you were basing your morals being a Christian . That is how the issue of who sets the STANDARDS of MORALS if there is no GOD to follow ?
I already stated a disclaimer for this, you could have forgotten to read it or missed to comprehend my point. As I was saying regarding this scenario, regarding the throwing of the holy water, I was not meddling on the part that it is a religious moral or not but to the parallel idea which we are talking right now. Knowing what is bad and what is good with regards to your conscience ability to "enforce" those knowledge on your future actions/decisions.
If I smoke MJ , my conscience dictates me that it is bad even without knowing its side effects and whatever negative contributions it will provide to the people around me . Just by knowing it is a DRUG and whatever knowledge it covers is outside of my perimeter . All I need to know is that its a drug . On the Jamaicans issue , it is religious for them . They are being guided probably to a somehwat similar to the 10 COmmandments or whatever it is for them . They are bounded by the POLICIES of their beliefs .
You missed some points and left a hefty amount of idea for consideration.
Did you conduct the study about the Jamaicans ? ANy surveys ? Tallies ? Talk to Jamaicans like in the thousands ? Dont speak for them ... you yourself probably havent even seen weed in your whole life and just correct me if I am wrong .
We are talking about the idea, I also stated a disclaimer on this, that the accuracy will/may not matter as long as the idea is preserved.
When we talk about CONSCIENCE and KNOWLEDGE , dont limit yourself to a specific issue . Cover the whole 9 yards , elaborate and generalized .
I am not limiting myself to what I have given you, there is so much more I can give to prove my point. An idea I have been contemplating for quite a long time now. And out of common sense and knowledge, I concluded what I stated to you and I can defend and prove it.
We need knowledge to govern what is right or wrong, and conscience to police it.